1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they have learned during the semester on project management. Course Learning Outcomes This assessment is linked to the following Course Learning Outcomes: CLO 2 Critically appraise projects using industry standards and methods CLO 4 Substantiate recommendations for enhancing project performance using relevant research Assessment Type: Report, Individual assessment Word limit: 2000 words (reference list included in word count) Due date: Thursday of Week 7, 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 30% 2 Assessment details Details You are required to develop a project evaluation report based on a case study provided on Canvas. Your project evaluation report will answer four specific questions which are provided with the case study. The project evaluation report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned during the semester about project management. You have to write an evaluation report for a project based on a case study on Canvas. In your report evaluating the project, you will answer four questions that come with the case study. The project evaluation report is your chance to show what you've learned about the project over the course of the semester. project management. You should answer each question in a logical way and use references from books and academic journals. You should present your answer to each question logically and use references from academic journals and books to substantiate key points. You should cite at least 3 different references in each answer using the RMIT Harvard/Business format. We would like you to demonstrate independent research into project management concepts. Thus, the references provided in the summary case study and the course text are not included in the minimum 3 references required for each answer. You may cite them, but your answers should focus on project management concepts, practice and evidence-based solutions that respond to the question rather than a detailed description of issues evident in the case. The requirement to use three project management references beyond those provided with the case and the course text is noted as 3 new references in the assessment rubric. The assessment criteria noted in the rubric specifies originality. This means you must avoid over reliance on quotations in your answer. You are encouraged to paraphrase sources wherever possible and to compare and contrast sources to demonstrate critical analysis of the issues. Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study the literature for ways to approach them. To support your answer, you can refer to project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and authenticated sources. This assignment must be presented in a word document containing 4 numbered sections. The section number should correspond to the question being answered. E.g. 1-4. You must also include a RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list at the close of your submission. No title sheet, introduction, conclusion or executive summary is required. You just need to answer the four questions and include a reference list. Submit your report via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. It is your responsibility to ensure your report has a satisfactory Turnitin result when you submit. This means you should submit early to allow time to read, interpret results, and to fix any issues that are evident. Usually, it should record a matching score of less than 20%. We are using a common set of questions so in some circumstances a higher score may be acceptable providing only common elements are highlighted (e.g. Section headings/name of the case). Where whole sentences or significant portions of sentences are highlighted, try to paraphrase to reduce similarity when resubmitting your report. Do not copy and paste the case summary, case study report or case references without citing sources in accordance with the RMIT Harvard/Business format. When you refer to the case, ensure you cite the relevant source. All text copied from a source must appear in quotation marks with a citation. All paraphrased text based on a source must include a relevant citation to demonstrate your research. A whole list of references being highlighted as coming from a single source is also problematic whereas a multi coloured reference list is usually OK. Familiarise yourself with how to use Turnitin to check the originality of your submission via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. Make sure you check your work well in advance of the submission due date. Always ask your tutor if you are concerned about Turnitin results. Only upload one word file containing your report. Do not upload or include a cover sheet in your submission. It is not necessary as uploading to Turnitin indicates your agreement to the terms of assessment submission. 3 Referencing guidelines You must acknowledge all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing. Submission format Upload as one (1) single file to Turnitin via the link below. Make sure the file type is an accepted format. For further information, refer to the Turnitin guide . Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas. You should take extreme care that you have: − Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods, − Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites. If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own. RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct. Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including: − Failure to properly document a source − Copyright material from the internet or databases − Collusion between students For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website. Assessment declaration When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration. Use RMIT Business (Harvard Style) for this assessment. 4 Assessment Criteria Criteria Ratings Pts HD D C P N Question 1 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 2 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. 5 beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 3 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 6 Question 4 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Reference list and length An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Presentation is of a professional standard. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. One or two minor issues are noted but presentation is very good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Some issues are noted but presentation is good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Several issues are noted but presentation is satisfactory. References are incomplete/missing or incorrectly formatted and/or the report does not meet length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 2 to >1.59 Pts 1.59 to >1.39 Pts 1.39 to >1.19 Pts 1.19 to >0.99 Pts 0.99 to >0 Pts 2 Total: 30 pts

Assignment Answers
Best Ideas for Dissertation Topics
1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they have learned during the semester on project management. Course Learning Outcomes This assessment is linked to the following Course Learning Outcomes: CLO 2 Critically appraise projects using industry standards and methods CLO 4 Substantiate recommendations for enhancing project performance using relevant research Assessment Type: Report, Individual assessment Word limit: 2000 words (reference list included in word count) Due date: Thursday of Week 7, 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 30% 2 Assessment details Details You are required to develop a project evaluation report based on a case study provided on Canvas. Your project evaluation report will answer four specific questions which are provided with the case study. The project evaluation report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned during the semester about project management. You have to write an evaluation report for a project based on a case study on Canvas. In your report evaluating the project, you will answer four questions that come with the case study. The project evaluation report is your chance to show what you've learned about the project over the course of the semester. project management. You should answer each question in a logical way and use references from books and academic journals. You should present your answer to each question logically and use references from academic journals and books to substantiate key points. You should cite at least 3 different references in each answer using the RMIT Harvard/Business format. We would like you to demonstrate independent research into project management concepts. Thus, the references provided in the summary case study and the course text are not included in the minimum 3 references required for each answer. You may cite them, but your answers should focus on project management concepts, practice and evidence-based solutions that respond to the question rather than a detailed description of issues evident in the case. The requirement to use three project management references beyond those provided with the case and the course text is noted as 3 new references in the assessment rubric. The assessment criteria noted in the rubric specifies originality. This means you must avoid over reliance on quotations in your answer. You are encouraged to paraphrase sources wherever possible and to compare and contrast sources to demonstrate critical analysis of the issues. Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study the literature for ways to approach them. To support your answer, you can refer to project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and authenticated sources. This assignment must be presented in a word document containing 4 numbered sections. The section number should correspond to the question being answered. E.g. 1-4. You must also include a RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list at the close of your submission. No title sheet, introduction, conclusion or executive summary is required. You just need to answer the four questions and include a reference list. Submit your report via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. It is your responsibility to ensure your report has a satisfactory Turnitin result when you submit. This means you should submit early to allow time to read, interpret results, and to fix any issues that are evident. Usually, it should record a matching score of less than 20%. We are using a common set of questions so in some circumstances a higher score may be acceptable providing only common elements are highlighted (e.g. Section headings/name of the case). Where whole sentences or significant portions of sentences are highlighted, try to paraphrase to reduce similarity when resubmitting your report. Do not copy and paste the case summary, case study report or case references without citing sources in accordance with the RMIT Harvard/Business format. When you refer to the case, ensure you cite the relevant source. All text copied from a source must appear in quotation marks with a citation. All paraphrased text based on a source must include a relevant citation to demonstrate your research. A whole list of references being highlighted as coming from a single source is also problematic whereas a multi coloured reference list is usually OK. Familiarise yourself with how to use Turnitin to check the originality of your submission via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. Make sure you check your work well in advance of the submission due date. Always ask your tutor if you are concerned about Turnitin results. Only upload one word file containing your report. Do not upload or include a cover sheet in your submission. It is not necessary as uploading to Turnitin indicates your agreement to the terms of assessment submission. 3 Referencing guidelines You must acknowledge all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing. Submission format Upload as one (1) single file to Turnitin via the link below. Make sure the file type is an accepted format. For further information, refer to the Turnitin guide . Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas. You should take extreme care that you have: − Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods, − Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites. If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own. RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct. Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including: − Failure to properly document a source − Copyright material from the internet or databases − Collusion between students For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website. Assessment declaration When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration. Use RMIT Business (Harvard Style) for this assessment. 4 Assessment Criteria Criteria Ratings Pts HD D C P N Question 1 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 2 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. 5 beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 3 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 6 Question 4 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Reference list and length An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Presentation is of a professional standard. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. One or two minor issues are noted but presentation is very good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Some issues are noted but presentation is good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Several issues are noted but presentation is satisfactory. References are incomplete/missing or incorrectly formatted and/or the report does not meet length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 2 to >1.59 Pts 1.59 to >1.39 Pts 1.39 to >1.19 Pts 1.19 to >0.99 Pts 0.99 to >0 Pts 2 Total: 30 pts

Best Ideas for Dissertation Topics

1 School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain — Business Project Management (BUSM4611) Assessment 3: Project appraisal report Overview Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they have learned during the semester on project management. Course Learning Outcomes This assessment is linked to the following Course Learning Outcomes: CLO 2 Critically appraise projects using industry standards and methods CLO 4 Substantiate recommendations for enhancing project performance using relevant research Assessment Type: Report, Individual assessment Word limit: 2000 words (reference list included in word count) Due date: Thursday of Week 7, 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 30% 2 Assessment details Details You are required to develop a project evaluation report based on a case study provided on Canvas. Your project evaluation report will answer four specific questions which are provided with the case study. The project evaluation report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned during the semester about project management. You have to write an evaluation report for a project based on a case study on Canvas. In your report evaluating the project, you will answer four questions that come with the case study. The project evaluation report is your chance to show what you’ve learned about the project over the course of the semester. project management. You should answer each question in a logical way and use references from books and academic journals. You should present your answer to each question logically and use references from academic journals and books to substantiate key points. You should cite at least 3 different references in each answer using the RMIT Harvard/Business format. We would like you to demonstrate independent research into project management concepts. Thus, the references provided in the summary case study and the course text are not included in the minimum 3 references required for each answer. You may cite them, but your answers should focus on project management concepts, practice and evidence-based solutions that respond to the question rather than a detailed description of issues evident in the case. The requirement to use three project management references beyond those provided with the case and the course text is noted as 3 new references in the assessment rubric. The assessment criteria noted in the rubric specifies originality. This means you must avoid over reliance on quotations in your answer. You are encouraged to paraphrase sources wherever possible and to compare and contrast sources to demonstrate critical analysis of the issues. Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study the literature for ways to approach them. To support your answer, you can refer to project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and authenticated sources. This assignment must be presented in a word document containing 4 numbered sections. The section number should correspond to the question being answered. E.g. 1-4. You must also include a RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list at the close of your submission. No title sheet, introduction, conclusion or executive summary is required. You just need to answer the four questions and include a reference list. Submit your report via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. It is your responsibility to ensure your report has a satisfactory Turnitin result when you submit. This means you should submit early to allow time to read, interpret results, and to fix any issues that are evident. Usually, it should record a matching score of less than 20%. We are using a common set of questions so in some circumstances a higher score may be acceptable providing only common elements are highlighted (e.g. Section headings/name of the case). Where whole sentences or significant portions of sentences are highlighted, try to paraphrase to reduce similarity when resubmitting your report. Do not copy and paste the case summary, case study report or case references without citing sources in accordance with the RMIT Harvard/Business format. When you refer to the case, ensure you cite the relevant source. All text copied from a source must appear in quotation marks with a citation. All paraphrased text based on a source must include a relevant citation to demonstrate your research. A whole list of references being highlighted as coming from a single source is also problematic whereas a multi coloured reference list is usually OK. Familiarise yourself with how to use Turnitin to check the originality of your submission via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. Make sure you check your work well in advance of the submission due date. Always ask your tutor if you are concerned about Turnitin results. Only upload one word file containing your report. Do not upload or include a cover sheet in your submission. It is not necessary as uploading to Turnitin indicates your agreement to the terms of assessment submission. 3 Referencing guidelines You must acknowledge all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and referencing guides for printing. Submission format Upload as one (1) single file to Turnitin via the link below. Make sure the file type is an accepted format. For further information, refer to the Turnitin guide . Academic integrity and plagiarism Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas. You should take extreme care that you have: − Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted (i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through the appropriate referencing methods, − Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary. This includes material taken from Internet sites. If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own. RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct. Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including: − Failure to properly document a source − Copyright material from the internet or databases − Collusion between students For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website. Assessment declaration When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration. Use RMIT Business (Harvard Style) for this assessment. 4 Assessment Criteria Criteria Ratings Pts HD D C P N Question 1 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 2 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. 5 beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Question 3 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 6 Question 4 Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. The answer is of a professional standard. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. One or two minor issues are noted but the answer is very good Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high- quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Some issues are noted but the answer is good. Original critical analysis of the key project management concept (highlighted in the question) with respect to the case is presented. Three new high-quality references beyond those provided in the case and the course text are cited to support key points. Several issues are noted but the answer is satisfactory. Limited or no critical analysis of the key project management concept is presented. Too few new or no references are presented to support key points. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7 Reference list and length An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Presentation is of a professional standard. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. One or two minor issues are noted but presentation is very good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Some issues are noted but presentation is good. An RMIT Harvard/Business format reference list is presented. All entries are of high quality, complete and correspond to citations included in answers. The submission meets length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. Several issues are noted but presentation is satisfactory. References are incomplete/missing or incorrectly formatted and/or the report does not meet length requirements within the +/-10% tolerance. A zero grade applies if the criteria is not addressed or no submission is received. 7 2 to >1.59 Pts 1.59 to >1.39 Pts 1.39 to >1.19 Pts 1.19 to >0.99 Pts 0.99 to >0 Pts 2 Total: 30 pts

August 2nd, 2023 Medical

1
School of Accounting Information Systems and Supply Chain
—
Business Project Management (BUSM4611)
Assessment 3: Project appraisal report
Overview
Each individual student will work on a supplied project and will answer some specific questions and submit the project
appraisal report. The project appraisal report is an opportunity for post-graduate students to demonstrate what they
have learned during the semester on project management.
Course Learning Outcomes
This assessment is linked to the following Course Learning Outcomes:
CLO 2 Critically appraise projects using industry standards and methods
CLO 4 Substantiate recommendations for enhancing project performance using relevant research
Assessment Type: Report, Individual assessment Word limit: 2000 words
(reference list included in
word count)
Due date: Thursday of Week 7,
23:59 (Melbourne time)
Weighting: 30%
2
Assessment details
Details
You are required to develop a project evaluation report based on a case study provided on Canvas. Your project
evaluation report will answer four specific questions which are provided with the case study. The project
evaluation report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned during the semester about
project management. You have to write an evaluation report for a project based on a case study on Canvas. In your report evaluating the project, you will answer four questions that come with the case study. The project evaluation report is your chance to show what you’ve learned about the project over the course of the semester.

project management.

You should answer each question in a logical way and use references from books and academic journals.
You should present your answer to each question logically and use references from academic journals and books
to substantiate key points. You should cite at least 3 different references in each answer using the RMIT
Harvard/Business format. We would like you to demonstrate independent research into project management
concepts. Thus, the references provided in the summary case study and the course text are not included in the
minimum 3 references required for each answer. You may cite them, but your answers should focus on project
management concepts, practice and evidence-based solutions that respond to the question rather than a detailed
description of issues evident in the case. The requirement to use three project management references beyond
those provided with the case and the course text is noted as 3 new references in the assessment rubric.
The assessment criteria noted in the rubric specifies originality. This means you must avoid over reliance on
quotations in your answer. You are encouraged to paraphrase sources wherever possible and to compare and
contrast sources to demonstrate critical analysis of the issues.
Some of the answers are matters of opinion and you will need to study the literature for ways to approach them.
To support your answer, you can refer to project management books, PMBOK, peer reviewed journal articles and
authenticated sources.
This assignment must be presented in a word document containing 4 numbered sections. The section number
should correspond to the question being answered. E.g. 1-4. You must also include a RMIT Harvard/Business
format reference list at the close of your submission. No title sheet, introduction, conclusion or executive summary
is required. You just need to answer the four questions and include a reference list.
Submit your report via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. It is your responsibility to ensure your report has
a satisfactory Turnitin result when you submit. This means you should submit early to allow time to read, interpret
results, and to fix any issues that are evident. Usually, it should record a matching score of less than 20%. We are
using a common set of questions so in some circumstances a higher score may be acceptable providing only
common elements are highlighted (e.g. Section headings/name of the case).
Where whole sentences or significant portions of sentences are highlighted, try to paraphrase to reduce similarity
when resubmitting your report. Do not copy and paste the case summary, case study report or case references
without citing sources in accordance with the RMIT Harvard/Business format. When you refer to the case, ensure
you cite the relevant source. All text copied from a source must appear in quotation marks with a citation. All
paraphrased text based on a source must include a relevant citation to demonstrate your research.
A whole list of references being highlighted as coming from a single source is also problematic whereas a multi
coloured reference list is usually OK. Familiarise yourself with how to use Turnitin to check the originality of your
submission via the Turnitin submission point on Canvas. Make sure you check your work well in advance of the
submission due date. Always ask your tutor if you are concerned about Turnitin results.
Only upload one word file containing your report. Do not upload or include a cover sheet in your submission. It is
not necessary as uploading to Turnitin indicates your agreement to the terms of assessment submission.
3
Referencing guidelines
You must acknowledge all the sources of information you have used in your
assessments.
Please use RMIT Harvard referencing style for this assignment. Please visit RMIT
library referencing page for more tools such as EndNote, referencing tutorials and
referencing guides for printing.
Submission format
Upload as one (1) single file to Turnitin via the link below. Make sure the file
type is an accepted format. For further information, refer to the Turnitin
guide .
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Academic integrity is about honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others
while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas.
You should take extreme care that you have:
− Acknowledged words, data, diagrams, models, frameworks and/or ideas of others you have quoted
(i.e. directly copied), summarised, paraphrased, discussed or mentioned in your assessment through
the appropriate referencing methods,
− Provided a reference list of the publication details so your reader can locate the source if necessary.
This includes material taken from Internet sites.
If you do not acknowledge the sources of your material, you may be accused of plagiarism because you have
passed off the work and ideas of another person without appropriate referencing, as if they were your own.
RMIT University treats plagiarism as a very serious offence constituting misconduct.
Plagiarism covers a variety of inappropriate behaviours, including:
− Failure to properly document a source
− Copyright material from the internet or databases
− Collusion between students
For further information on our policies and procedures, please refer to the University website.
Assessment declaration
When you submit work electronically, you agree to the assessment declaration.
Use RMIT
Business
(Harvard
Style) for this
assessment.
4
Assessment Criteria
Criteria Ratings Pts
HD D C P N
Question 1
Original critical analysis of the key
project management concept
(highlighted in the question) with
respect to the case is presented.
Three new high-quality references
beyond those provided in the case
and the course text are cited to
support key points.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the
case is presented.
Three new high quality references
beyond those
provided in the
case and the
course text are
cited to support
key points.
Original critical analysis
of the key project
management concept
(highlighted in the
question) with respect
to the case is
presented. Three new
high-quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
support key points. One
or two minor issues are
noted but the answer is
very good.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the case
is presented. Three
new high- quality
references beyond
those provided in
the case and the
course text are
cited to support key
points. Some
issues are noted
but the answer is
good.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project management
concept (highlighted in
the question) with
respect to the case is
presented. Three new
high-quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
support key points.
Several issues are
noted but the answer
is satisfactory.
Limited or no
critical analysis of
the key project
management
concept is
presented. Too
few new or no
references are
presented to
support key points.
A zero grade
applies if the
criteria is not
addressed or no
submission is
received.
7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7
Question 2
Original critical analysis of the key
project management concept
(highlighted in the question) with
respect to the case is presented.
Three new high-quality references
beyond those provided in the case
and the course text are cited to
support key points
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the
case is presented.
Three new high quality references
Original critical analysis
of the key project
management concept
(highlighted in the
question) with respect
to the case is
presented. Three new
high- quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the case
is presented. Three
new high- quality
references beyond
Original critical
analysis of the key
project management
concept (highlighted in
the question) with
respect to the case is
presented. Three new
high-quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
Limited or no
critical analysis of
the key project
management
concept is
presented. Too
few new or no
references are
presented to
support key points.
5
beyond those
provided in the
case and the
course text are
cited to support
key points. The
answer is of a
professional
standard.
support key points. One
or two minor issues are
noted but the answer is
very good.
those provided in
the case and the
course text are
cited to support key
points. Some
issues are noted
but the answer is
good.
support key points.
Several issues are
noted but the answer
is satisfactory.
A zero grade
applies if the
criteria is not
addressed or no
submission is
received.
7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7
Question 3
Original critical analysis of the key
project management concept
(highlighted in the question) with
respect to the case is presented.
Three new high-quality references
beyond those provided in the case
and the course text are cited to
support key points.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the
case is presented.
Three new high quality references
beyond those
provided in the
case and the
course text are
cited to support
key points. The
answer is of a
professional
standard.
Original critical analysis
of the key project
management concept
(highlighted in the
question) with respect
to the case is
presented. Three new
high- quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
support key points. One
or two minor issues are
noted but the answer is
very good.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the case
is presented. Three
new high- quality
references beyond
those provided in
the case and the
course text are
cited to support key
points. Some
issues are noted
but the answer is
good.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project management
concept (highlighted in
the question) with
respect to the case is
presented. Three new
high-quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
support key points.
Several issues are
noted but the answer
is satisfactory.
Limited or no
critical analysis of
the key project
management
concept is
presented. Too
few new or no
references are
presented to
support key points.
A zero grade
applies if the
criteria is not
addressed or no
submission is
received.
7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7
6
Question 4
Original critical analysis of the key
project management concept
(highlighted in the question) with
respect to the case is presented.
Three new high-quality references
beyond those provided in the case
and the course text are cited to
support key points.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the
case is presented.
Three new high quality references
beyond those
provided in the
case and the
course text are
cited to support
key points. The
answer is of a
professional
standard.
Original critical analysis
of the key project
management concept
(highlighted in the
question) with respect
to the case is
presented. Three new
high- quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
support key points. One
or two minor issues are
noted but the answer is
very good
Original critical
analysis of the key
project
management
concept
(highlighted in the
question) with
respect to the case
is presented. Three
new high- quality
references beyond
those provided in
the case and the
course text are
cited to support key
points. Some
issues are noted
but the answer is
good.
Original critical
analysis of the key
project management
concept (highlighted in
the question) with
respect to the case is
presented. Three new
high-quality references
beyond those provided
in the case and the
course text are cited to
support key points.
Several issues are
noted but the answer
is satisfactory.
Limited or no
critical analysis of
the key project
management
concept is
presented. Too
few new or no
references are
presented to
support key points.
A zero grade
applies if the
criteria is not
addressed or no
submission is
received.
7 to >5.59 Pts 5.59 to >4.89 Pts 4.89 to >4.19 Pts 4.19 to >3.49 Pts 3.49 to >0 Pts 7
Reference list and length
An RMIT Harvard/Business format
reference list is presented. All
entries are of high quality, complete
and correspond to citations
included in answers. The
submission meets length
requirements within the +/-10%
tolerance
An RMIT
Harvard/Business
format reference
list is presented.
All entries are of
high quality,
complete and
correspond to
citations included
in answers. The
submission meets
length
requirements
within the +/-10%
tolerance.
Presentation is of
a professional
standard.
An RMIT
Harvard/Business
format reference list is
presented. All entries
are of high quality,
complete and
correspond to citations
included in answers.
The submission meets
length requirements
within the +/-10%
tolerance. One or two
minor issues are noted
but presentation is very
good.
An RMIT
Harvard/Business
format reference
list is presented. All
entries are of high
quality, complete
and correspond to
citations included in
answers. The
submission meets
length
requirements within
the +/-10%
tolerance. Some
issues are noted
but presentation is
good.
An RMIT
Harvard/Business
format reference list is
presented. All entries
are of high quality,
complete and
correspond to citations
included in answers.
The submission meets
length requirements
within the +/-10%
tolerance. Several
issues are noted but
presentation is
satisfactory.
References are
incomplete/missing
or incorrectly
formatted and/or
the report does not
meet length
requirements
within the +/-10%
tolerance.
A zero grade
applies if the
criteria is not
addressed or no
submission is
received.
7
2 to >1.59 Pts 1.59 to >1.39 Pts 1.39 to >1.19 Pts 1.19 to >0.99 Pts 0.99 to >0 Pts 2
Total: 30 pts

cheap essay service online, dissertation ideas, essay service website, essay topics

Published by

Medical

View all posts

Nursing Theories Assignment

What are Nursing Theories? Nursing theories are organized bodies of knowledge that define what nursing is, what nurses do, and why they do it. They provide a framework for understanding the nature, scope, and purpose of nursing as a profession and a discipline. Nursing theories also guide nursing practice, research, education, and administration by offering […]

Company Report — 1,200 words (+/-10%); individual assessmen

Assessment 2 Assessment Type: Company Report — 1,200 words (+/-10%); individual assessment Purpose: The purpose of this report is to demonstrate research and academic literacy skills. Building on Assessment 1, you need to produce writing that is clear, concise and meaningful, whilst now incorporating evidence from sources. The structure, format, cohesion and coherence of report […]

COIT20248 Information Systems Analysis and Design Assignment 1 – Systems Analysis

COIT20248 Information Systems Analysis and Design Assignment 1 – Systems Analysis Due date: Week 6 Friday (24th August 2018) 11:55 PM AEST ASSESSMENT Weighting: 30% Length: 1500 words (+/- 10%) 1 Objectives This assessment relates to course learning outcomes 1 and 5 stated in the e-course profile. Assessment 1 is an individual assessment. In assessment […]

In need of this paper or similar homework assignment answers? Order from us today and get the best custom writing services! Top grades - AI/plagiarsim free papers guaranteed

Place an order | Check price