Please use APA 7th edition
Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Pediatric Primary Care
This assignment is a formal paper. This includes APA 7th edition format, title page, headings, literature review, proper citation and reference list per APA, logical sequence, conclusions, and clarity. The paper should be 2–3 pages in length formatted in single space (not double space) excluding the title page and reference page. The paper must demonstrate your understanding of the topics. Content must include independent ideas and conclusions. At a minimum, the following topics must be well articulated in the paper. Remember that discussion of each topic requires citations that are current (less than 5 years old) and relevant. Please refer to the grading rubric for how your paper will be graded.
Assignment Requirements
• Explain how multidisciplinary collaboration can affect clinical decision-making.
• Discuss how collaboration can lead to improved patient outcomes.
• Discuss how a lack of collaboration can lead to poor patient outcomes.
• Identify three barriers to professional collaboration among healthcare professionals and patients?
• What are the five best ways to promote professional collaboration in pediatric primary care?
• How can the nurse practitioner encourage and support collaboration among the patient, family, caregivers, and healthcare professionals?
Collaboration and Improved Patient Outcomes
Introduction
Collaboration is important for the success of any team or organization, but especially in the healthcare field. Reeves et al. (2017) say that a group can work together if everyone trusts each other, shares, shares information, ideas, and skills, works toward a common goal, and has a single goal. In health care, it’s important to work together to reach a common goal of quickly giving the patient high-quality, appropriate, and safe care. This increases organizational efficiency and keeps the patient from getting hurt unnecessarily.
Collaboration between people from different fields and making clinical decisions.
Interprofessional cooperation in healthcare lowers costs by improving patient outcomes, making the patient experience better, and cutting down on prescription errors (Taberna et al., 2020). Hospitals can also save money by getting rid of unnecessary tasks and inefficiencies. Clinical decision-making (CDM) often takes place in multidisciplinary settings, where healthcare providers must work together to decide on progress Assessments, management strategies, treatment goals, and diagnoses. Hughes (2021) says that working as part of a multidisciplinary team lets you treat the patient in a whole and complete way.
Collaboration and Better Outcomes for Patients
In addition to care team meetings, some hospitals now recommend team-based rounds that include primary care doctors, bedside nurses, specialists, and other relevant team members. Also, it’s helpful for hospitals to have communication technology that makes it easy and safe for care teams to work together and talk on-site or at the point of care using video, voice, or text. Interprofessional cooperation in health care can help find the best doses for medicines, cut down on unwanted side effects, and lower death rates (Reeves et al., 2017). With so many doctors writing prescriptions and nurses giving out medications, it’s easy to see how mistakes could happen. Interprofessional work fills in the gaps once more. Not only does healthcare communication technology automate alerts, but it also keeps lines of communication open between members of the care team. Most of the time, a care team communication platform will get the right information to the right people at the right time.
Patients don’t do well because doctors don’t work together.
If people don’t talk to each other well, it could hurt the patient. Patients also face serious health risks from it (Stewart, 2018). Lack of teamwork, for example, can make it hard for care providers to talk to each other, which can lead to poor care. If people don’t work together, patients could get hurt, die, get the wrong medicine, have to wait longer for treatment, get the wrong diagnosis, or be unhappy. If doctors and nurses don’t talk to each other, bad things could happen.
Stopping Professionals from Working Together
The main things that make it hard for healthcare professionals to work together are bad communication, worries about identity, unclear roles, and a lack of training and time. Rawlison (2021) says that poor cooperation in the healthcare industry is the main cause of high healthcare costs, wasted resources, bad outcomes for patients, and lower treatment quality. When people don’t talk to each other well, it can hurt both the patients and the staff. Some examples are when case managers, doctors, physical therapists, nurses, etc. don’t talk to each other or don’t recognize each other as professionals. Problems with reimbursement, like not being able to add up the time spent on care, are also a barrier.
Nurse Practitioner and Getting People to Work Together
By teaching patients and other members of the healthcare team and leading by example in everything they do, a nurse practitioner can encourage and foster cooperation between healthcare professionals, caregivers, the patient’s family, and the patient. Muller et al. (2018) say that multidisciplinary rounds are a fast way to improve communication between departments. Nurses should tell their staff to take advantage of these chances to ask questions, get more information, and talk with other health care workers about how to help patients reach their goals.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when nurse practitioners do bedside rounds, they may work with other team members and the patient to share a care plan, set goals, and get their help in giving the patient the best care possible. By taking part in and encouraging interprofessional and interprofessional dialogue, nurse practitioners can promote and help cooperation. Also, bedside rounds make patients feel happier and safer, which helps them do better.
References
Hughes, C. (2021). Multidisciplinary teamwork ensures better healthcare outcomes. Last modified, 21. https://www.td.org/insights/multidisciplinary-teamwork-ensures-better-healthcare-outcomes
Müller, C. A., Fleischmann, N., Cavazzini, C., Heim, S., Seide, S., Geister, C., … & Hummers, E. (2018). Interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes (interprof): development and piloting of measures to improve interprofessional collaboration and communication: a qualitative multicentre study. BMC family practice, 19(1), 1-11. https://bmcprimcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-017-0678-1
Rawlinson, C., Carron, T., Cohidon, C., Arditi, C., Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., … & Gilles, I. (2021). An overview of reviews on interprofessional collaboration in primary care: barriers and facilitators. International journal of integrated care, 21(2). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8231480/#:~:text=Main%20barriers%20referred%20to%20lack,other%20professionals’%20skills%20and%20contribution.
Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6). https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3/pdf/full
Stewart, M. A. (2018). Stuck in the middle: The impact of collaborative interprofessional communication on patient expectations. Shoulder & Elbow, 10(1), 66-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5734531/#:~:text=found%20that%20ineffective%20communication%20leads,healthcare%20professions%20is%20urgently%20needed.
Taberna, M., Gil Moncayo, F., Jané-Salas, E., Antonio, M., Arribas, L., Vilajosana, E., … & Mesía, R. (2020). The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Frontiers in oncology, 10, 85. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.00085/full
