ENG 106 Topic 2 DQ 2
ENG 106 Topic 2 DQ 2
In the Aristotelian or Classical Framework for argument, a writer might target an audience of readers that is undecided or neutral about the main claim (thesis statement) of the essay. A section is placed directly before the conclusion for acknowledging opposing viewpoints. Then the writer chooses to concede or refute that view.
Why does the writer not want to spend much time on an opposing viewpoint? Why mention that viewpoint at all? How might a concession help or hinder the main claim of the essay (the thesis)? What are some opposing viewpoints you might include in your definition essay?
————-
ENG 106 Topic 2 DQ 2 ENG 106 Topic 2 DQ 2 ENG 106 Topic 2 DQ 2
A writer could target an audience of readers who are indecisive or neutral regarding the essay’s major claim (thesis statement) under the Aristotelian or Classical Framework for argument. Before the end, there is a portion dedicated to addressing opposing opinions. The writer then decides whether to accept or reject that point of view.
Why is it that the author does not wish to devote much time to a different point of view? Why bring up that point of view at all? How may a concession help or hurt the essay’s major point (the thesis)? What are some different points of view you may incorporate in your definition essay?
