Think about two environments you have experienced.

The first environment is one that did not confront the brutal facts, where the people (and the truth) were not heard.
The second environment is one that did confront the brutal facts, where people had a tremendous opportunity to be heard.
What accounts for the difference between the two environments? If you do not have this life experience you are not off the hook—you will need to interview a leader who has these experiences and report on that. What does the contrast teach us about how to construct an environment where the truth is heard? Using strong Biblical support, explain how you relate this to your Christian Worldview. Does your Christian Worldview help you develop this environment? How does this relate to the ethical components of Meese & Ortmeier: Leadership, Ethics, and Policing: Challenges for the 21st Century? 500 WORDS

—

Consider two different environments you’ve been in.

The first atmosphere is one in which the brutal facts are not confronted, and where the people (and the truth) are not heard.

The second setting was one that confronted the harsh realities and provided people with a significant opportunity to be heard.

What is the cause of the disparity between the two environments? If you don’t have this life experience, you’ll still need to interview and report on a leader who does. What can we learn from the contrast about how to create an environment where the truth may be heard? Explain how this relates to your Christian worldview using biblical evidence. Is your Christian worldview Helping you in creating this environment? How

Published by

Essays

View all posts