Desk of Contents
1 What this module is about………………………………………… Error! Bookmark not outlined.
1.1 Module introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………… 1.2 Module goals …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1.three Module studying outcomes ………………………………………………………………………………..
1.four Communication ……………………………………………………………………………………………….
2 Module schedule ……………………………………………………………………………………………………
2.1 Module studying actions …………………………………………………………………………….. 15
2.2 Progress report…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15
2.three Further periods ………………………………………………………………………………………. 15
three Key sources to Help studying…………………………………………………………………………….
three.1 Further Help ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 16
four Assessment …………………………………………………………….. Error! Bookmark not outlined.
four.1 Assessment abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………….
four.2 Task transient and submission ………………………………………………………………………
four.three Assessment marking standards. ………………………………………………………………………… 14
5 Suggestions and outcomes ………………………………………………………………………………………………
6 Understanding your Assessment duties …………………………………………………………
6.1 Extenuating circumstances and mitigation ………………………………………………………….. 6.2 Late submission ……………………………………………………………………………………………….
6.three Dishonest, plagiarism and different types of unfair observe. ……………………………………….
6.four Educational integrity ………………………………………………………………………………………. 18
7 Abstract of module …………………………………………………………………………………………… 19
Model Description Date Creator Assessment
1.zero Closing Template 16/08/19 PRE PRE
2.zero Up to date Template 19/12/20 PRE
three.zero Model 2022 29.01.22 NRP
2022 BA (Hons) Enterprise & Administration – Module Handbook
1 What this Module is About
Introduction
The Enterprise Ethics, Governance and Social Accountability module explores the values and rules that underpin moral decision-making in enterprise. These values and rules – based mostly upon notions of e.g. ‘equal respect’, ‘justice’, and ‘human rights’ – are thought of from totally different views.
Governance units the tone of a corporation, defining how energy is exerted and choices are reached. The function of management is of explicit significance right here. Leaders are not accountable for their colleagues’ particular person moral conduct, however they’re accountable for enabling their organizations to pay attention to moral which means and to mirror on it in sensible decision-making. Accountability – thought of as consciousness of what an individual is doing, how that matches into objective of the group they work for and the way that impacts the interior and exterior surroundings – has develop into a key moral class in enterprise ethics. This raises necessary questions as to who we’re accountable to and what now we have legal responsibility for.
Module Goals
BEGSR is supposed to develop college students’ talents to establish, critically appraise and make suggestions in regards to the moral and accountability influence of enterprise choices in a variety of contexts.
Module Studying Outcomes
On completion of this module, college students will be capable to:
Studying Consequence 1: Critically assess and apply theories referring to enterprise ethics, accountability, governance, and moral management.
Studying Consequence 2: Critically assess and develop methodology and observe in relation to enterprise ethics, accountability, governance and moral management;
Studying Consequence three: Study and establish concept and observe in these areas of enterprise decision-making, in response to an consciousness of the context of the group
2022 BA (Hons) Enterprise & Administration – Module Handbook 1
Communication
Module Tutor, Course Coordinator and Educational Director
These are the three people you’ll contact do you have to encounter any points all through the module, specifically your Module Tutor, the Course Coordinator and/ or the Educational director, listed in the identical order (together with their contact particulars) as follows:
Title E-mail Cellphone
Mr Ashween Bunwaree ashween.bunwaree@moodle.rbs.ac.mu –
Mrs Nandita Reedoy Pothegadoo nandita.reedoy-pothegadoo@rbs.ac.mu 6962671(ext.217)
Dr Priya Ramluggun-Essoo priya.ramluggun-essoo@rbs.ac.mu 6962671
2022 BA (Hons) Enterprise & Administration – Module Handbook 2
2 Module schedule
The module shall be delivered over eleven-week interval with lessons ranging between a minimal of two hours to a most of three hours as soon as per week. Further periods might also be carried out ought to your module tutor deem it vital.
The breakdown and tentative planning and construction of your course will be discovered within the desk beneath;
WEEKS TOPICS
Week 1 Introduction to Enterprise Ethics That means, values and observe
Week 2 Company Social Accountability
The Shareholder Perspective – The Stakeholder Perspective
Week three Teleological Enterprise Ethics
The utility of the result determines the moral appropriateness of enterprise exercise Deontological Enterprise Ethics
‘Ethical obligation’ transcends particular person acquire and revenue maximization.
Week four Ethics of Rights and Justice
Enterprise and human rights
Descriptive Ethics
The discourse of ethics and traditionally contingent norms, concepts and practices
Week 5
Modern Moral Concept
Advantage Ethics – Feminist Ethics – Stakeholder Concept
Week 6
Accountability and the Moral
Atmosphere
Accountability and Legal responsibility – Accountability and Energy
Week 7 Authorities and Regulation
The regulation of enterprise – Company political expression and authorities relations
Week eight
Management and Governance
Theories of management – Views of moral management – Ethics and governance & Progress report
Week 9
Sustainability
Sustainability and Accountability – Economization and Ecologization
Week 10
Globalization
World Justice- Multinational firms – Intercultural Ethics
Week 11-
Deadline
16.05.2022
Module Assessment & Assessment [An Ethical Analysis of a Business or Organization
(3000 words)]
An Moral Assessment of a Enterprise or Group (3500 phrases)
Re-Assessment June 2022 An Moral Assessment of a Enterprise or Group (3500 phrases) The coed should choose a unique enterprise or group than was the topic of the primary Assessment
Module studying actions
Lectures shall be used to introduce the fundamental ideas, functions and strategies related to enterprise ethics. Ethics is centered in observe, and variations between views develop into notably obvious when contemplating the extent, nature and focus of enterprise and organizational moral observe in several conditions and contexts. College students could have the chance to use these in observe, enterprise ‘stay’ examples of firms.
2.2 Progress report
A progress report is to be carried out on week eight of the module supply (see desk above). Throughout this progress report, the coed will need to have accomplished a minimal of half the Assessment transient (assignments/coursework’s/initiatives/tutorials solely) which must be run by their Turnitin drop containers and despatched to their respective module tutors to evaluate and supply suggestions.
This can Help the coed to realize a greater perspective of the development of their project and Help them to generate a very good educational piece of labor which has a consequently decrease similarity index.
Suggestions shall be delivered to you both by your Moodle web page or be given to you verbally.
2.3Additional periods
Must you as a pupil or ought to your module tutor really feel the necessity to have any further lessons or conduct any revision periods, you have to inform your course coordinator a minimum of three weeks previous to the top of the module to ensure that preparations to be made.
This may be achieved by sending an electronic mail by your class consultant and thus the course coordinator will see to it that the required preparations are made.
three Key Assets to Help Studying
With a purpose to Help your studying course of and give you the enough sources to totally comprehend this module, a listing of further studying supplies have been made obtainable to your utilization.
Core Textual content
Robinson, S. & Dowson, P. (2012) Enterprise Ethics in Follow London: Chartered Institute for Personnel Growth
Supplementary Texts
? Brown, M. T. (2005) Company Integrity: Rethinking Organizational Ethics and Management New York: Cambridge College Press
? Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2010) Enterprise Ethics: Managing Company Citizenship and Sustainability within the Age of Globalization third Version Oxford: Oxford College Press
? Sanford, C. (2011) The Accountable Enterprise: Reimagining Sustainability and Success San Francisco: Jossey Bass
? Jackson, T. (2011) Worldwide Administration Ethics: A Vital Cross-Cultural Perspective New York: Cambridge College Press
? Simpson, J. & Taylor, J. (2012) Company Governance Ethics and Company Social Accountability London: Jossey Bass
Articles
? Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005) ‘The enterprise case for company sustainability: literature Assessment and analysis choices’ in European Administration Journal 23:1 pp.27-36.
? Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011) ‘The brand new political function of enterprise in a globalized world:
a Assessment of a brand new perspective on CSR and its implications for the agency, governance, and democracy’ in Journal of Administration Research 48:four pp.899-931.
? Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003) ‘Company social accountability within the 21st century: a view from the worlds most profitable corporations’ in Journal of Enterprise Ethics 48:2 pp.175-187.
? Solitander, M., & Solitander, N. (2010). The sharing, safety and thievery of mental property: The case of the Components 1 trade. Administration Resolution, 48(1), 37-57.
? Spence, L. J., Coles, A. M., & Harris, L. (2001) ‘The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social accountability in relation to opponents’ in Enterprise and Society Assessment 106:four pp.331-352.
? Stoney, C., & Winstanley, D. (2001) ‘Stakeholding: confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain’ in Journal of Administration Research 38:5 pp.603-626.
? Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008) ‘Do totally different industries report company social accountability in another way? An investigation by the lens of stakeholder concept’ in Journal of Advertising Communications 14:2 pp.113-124. 2017/18 BEGSR Module Handbook eight
? O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, Ok. D. (2005) ‘A Assessment of the empirical moral decision-making literature 1996–2003’ in Journal of Enterprise Ethics 59:four pp.375-413.
? Polonsky, M. J. (1995) ‘A stakeholder concept method to designing environmental advertising technique’ in Journal of enterprise & Industrial Advertising 10:three pp.29-46.
? Robinson, S. (2009) ‘The character of accountability in an expert setting in Journal of Enterprise Ethics 88:1 pp.11-19.
? Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008) ‘The price of values: a literature Assessment on the relation between company social and monetary efficiency’ in Journal of Enterprise Ethics 82:2 pp.407424.
Further Help
All college students requiring further Help or various preparations for medical or different causes should declare and supply proof of their incapacity or medical situation to the Head of Administration and High quality Assurance, Ms. Kajal Purlackee Boodhoo.
E-mail: kajal.purlackee-boodhoo@rbs.ac.mu Cellphone: 696 2671 (Ext 512).
four Assessment
Your Assessment includes of ONE report as follows:
1. A report weighing 100% of your complete marks with a phrase depend of roughly 3500 phrases (+/- 10%).
four.1Assessment abstract
Assessment Technique: 1 Re-assessment Technique: 1
Examination Size/Phrase
Rely 3500 Examination Size/Phrase
Rely 3500
Assessment Date and Time: 16.05.2022 at 23.59 on Turnitin dropbox Re-assessment Date and Time: June 2022
Suggestions Technique: Moodle Suggestions Technique: Moodle
Suggestions Date: 5 days After moderation Suggestions Date: 5 days After moderation
Re-Assessment: The project is the identical, however you MUST selected a unique firm to your first sit
four.2Assignment Transient and submission
Assessment Steering Getting ready for the Assessment w/c 7 March 2022 Planning Your Moral Assessment
The sixth week of the module is a possibility for college students to mirror on the theories, ideas, case research and eventualities explored throughout the first half of the semester.
In the course of the w/c 7 March 2022 it’s best to:
• Resolve on the subject and focus of your moral Assessment
• Undertake preliminary analysis of your chosen enterprise or group
• Draft a plan of the Assessment (500 phrases). The plan ought to include
1. A quick overview of the important thing problems with the case, and;
2. Recommend the moral theories that prominently join with the chosen case.
Assessment
The coed is required to undertake an Assessment of the moral efficiency of a enterprise or group, both typically or in relation to a particular problem. The group chosen for Assessment is the selection of the coed. In concluding their Assessment, the coed ought to provide suggestions on the longer term growth of moral observe throughout the group.
Re-Assessment
The coed is required to undertake an Assessment of the moral efficiency of a enterprise or group, both typically or in relation to a particular problem. The group chosen for Assessment is the selection of the coed.
PLEASE NOTE: The moral Assessment should concentrate on a unique enterprise or group than the one chosen for the primary Assessment submission.
In concluding their Assessment, the coed ought to provide suggestions on the longer term growth of moral observe throughout the group.
The Assessment hyperlinks with the educational outcomes by providing college students the chance to exhibit a broad understanding of points relating to organisational ethics, governance and social accountability throughout the fashionable enterprise surroundings.
The coed will develop an understanding of the educational outcomes by holistically appreciating moral and social points. This shall be examined by a single written Assessment, comprising of three particular person elements, which would require a pupil to develop an enhanced understanding of enterprise ethics and the social accountability of organisations working throughout the modern enterprise surroundings The marker shall be searching for:
• Good educational observe (together with however not restricted to correct referencing)
• Efficient capability to offer a reasoned Assessment and argument
• Understanding of the precise moral points
• Data of the topic space
• Proof of fine analysis
• Means to critically analyse – not simply describe
• Inclusion of related concept/ideas
• Right utility of related concept/ideas
• Vital and analytical dialogue
• Clear and analytical arguments and conclusions
• Sensible and persuasive arguments
• Readability of arguments by good grammar
• Power of arguments
With a purpose to Help educational rigour 10% of the general marks shall be awarded for format, bibliography, references and presentation.
Report
Your report is a written project which is on account of begin inside two weeks of the introduction to the module. It should be written utilizing font sort, Instances New Roman and font measurement 12 with a line spacing of 1.15 and referenced utilizing the Harvard referencing system. You might be additionally requested to incorporate a canopy web page, introduction, summary, acknowledgement and desk of contents, with a reference record and a conclusion inside your project.
Module Title Enterprise Ethics, Governance & Social Duties
Assessment Title An Moral Assessment of a Enterprise or Group (3500 phrases)
Particular person/Group Particular person
Weighting 100%
Newest Hand in Date 16.05.2022
Studying Outcomes Assessed ? Critically assess and apply theories referring to enterprise ethics, accountability,
? governance and moral management;
? Critically assess and develop methodology and observe in relation to enterprise ethics,
? accountability, governance and moral management;
? Study and establish concept and observe in these areas of enterprise decision-making,
? in response to an consciousness of the context of the group.
Scholar Directions for Submission of Coursework
Be aware: NO ASSIGNMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED THROUGH EMAIL
This module requires you to submit your work on-line by our Moodle platform
You MUST submit your work by the VLE. Receipt of your work shall be recorded.
Your -Turnitin assignments- within the VLE has been set as much as allow you to examine your project your self as you submit it. An -Originality/Similarity Report- shall be made obtainable to the coed. This report will spotlight any points along with your work resembling uncited quotations and within the mild of which you’ll make vital corrections for resubmission of similar earlier than the due date.
Please word: Tutors will comply with up any suspected plagiarism and unfair observe discovered after the submission date as per RBS coverage. Late penalties will apply as per RBS rules.
four.3Assessment marking standards.
An in-depth breakdown of the marking standards is supplied beneath to be able to information the coed as to the place he stands with their educational work.
PASS FAIL
Criterion Studying Outcomes 90-100% 80-89% 70-79% 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 15-29% Lower than 15%
Alternative of Enterprise or Organisation
A suitably analytical perspective in choosing an applicable organisation based mostly on the necessities of the project transient.
The chosen organisation ought to enable the coed to fulfill the remaining standards successfully.
10% LO1
Wonderful selection of organisation.
Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive information that is distinctive and knowledgeable by the best degree of scholarship
Wonderful selection of organisation. Intensive information, understanding and excessive diploma of impartial, important dialogue. Wonderful selection of organisation. Thorough information, understanding and insightful dialogue Sensible choice of organisation with a
excessive degree of understanding and an excellent dialogue. Applicable selection of organisation. Affordable degree of understanding and a very good dialogue Appropriate selection.
Primary description. Some proof of understanding and an affordable dialogue. Organisation is largely unsuitable and poorly described.
Exhibits no perception. Organisation is unsuitable and inaccurately described. Lack of awareness of the Assessment.
Organisation chosen is unsuitable or unclear. No understanding of the Assessment.
Vital Analysis of Moral
Efficiency
Establish present points and critically
consider efficiency by way of moral enterprise practices and accountability. Central points embrace: classical and modern moral theories, company
citizenship; governance and management;
sustainability; stakeholder administration; the influence of a altering enterprise surroundings.
60% LO1 LO2
LO3
Wonderful integration of the total vary of
applicable rules, theories, proof and strategies.
Consciousness goes past the fabric displaying distinctive aptitude in important analysis. Intensive distinctive understanding points.
Authoritative and inventive important conceptual analysis moral efficiency. Excellent consciousness. and
of
of Wonderful and thorough
identification of points. Sturdy and assured important conceptual analysis of moral efficiency. Complete consciousness in key areas. Superior and thorough
identification of points, strong analysis of efficiency.
Vital dialogue of enterprise moral efficiency with use of conceptual instruments. Average and
appropriate identification of points with a fairly analytical
analysis of moral efficiency
utilizing applicable conceptual instruments. Sound consideration of enterprise moral efficiency.
A descriptive dialogue
providing little/no
identification of points going through the organisation. Poor conceptual Assessment. Some consideration of enterprise moral efficiency Poor try to judge efficiency in any of the strategies applicable to the module. Poor consideration of enterprise moral efficiency Little try to judge efficiency. Lack of awareness of module strategies. Little consideration of enterprise moral efficiency. No try to
consider efficiency.
Unclear and confused. No
discernible
information or understanding.
Suggestions to Improve Moral Efficiency and Accountability LO4
Distinctive utility of theoretical and technical information to attain inventive conceptual rationalisation and Wonderful identification of points. Distinctive rationalisation and contextualisation. Authoritative use of concept.
Excellent, Wonderful identification of points.
Complete
rationalisation and
contextualisation with important use of concept. Superior
identification of enhancements with important dialogue and good use of concept.
Suggestions
are Primary identification of enhancements with some try to rationalise them in context with concept. Enhancements listed solely with primary makes an attempt at contextualising
concept and observe. Poor identification of future developments. Inappropriate and uncritical concerns. Little try to establish future developments.
No try or insufficient consideration.
Supply a important dialogue of how the chosen group could develop its moral efficiency. Think about exterior environmental components which will influence the group to be able to provide a important Assessment.
Suggestions must be: researched;
sensible;
persuasive and applicable.
20%
contextualisation of points. Attaining the best degree of compelling,
coherent concept and concise
argument attainable throughout the degree of research.
convincing, believable suggestions Wonderful, convincing, believable suggestions convincing, researched strong properly and Considerably convincing
suggestions Little conviction in
suggestions
Educational
Follow Assessment format, citations, references, presentation.
10% Alternative to exhibit
educational abilities
and competences.
Distinctive skilled presentation utilizing an applicable vary of sources and reflecting skilled norms. Utilizing a full vary of high-quality sources to tell however not dominate the argument Exemplary
construction and commonplace of presentation.
Prolonged vary of sources inform a important and
dedicated argument. Wonderful referencing. Clear, built-in and centered presentation.
Complete vary
of literature and proof used. Insightful and
inventive Assessment. Wonderful referencing.
Coherent and wellorganised presentation. Breadth in literature and proof demonstrates prolonged studying. Precisely and full referencing with no main omissions. Suitably-organised and cheap presentation all through.
Applicable studying and sources accessed. Competent referencing and bibliography. A primary degree of presentation. Restricted use of primary sources. Largely correct with spelling and grammar. Restricted referencing Poor effort in presentation. Some spelling and grammatical
errors. Little or no proof of additional studying. Work
inappropriately referenced. Incoherent or
confused
presentation. Obscure. Poor or inappropriate sources. Typically weak educational abilities. No discernible try to construction or to current the Assessment appropriately. No proof of educational abilities.
5 Suggestions and outcomes
Formative suggestions shall be supplied actively and passively all through the module period. All workout routines and actions have been designed to Help a complete suggestions state of affairs by which college students, assuming participation, will obtain suggestions on their growth. Task suggestions shall be supplied by way of the VLE system (utilizing turnitin).
A mid-module Assessment shall be timetabled into your module by week 5. This is a possibility to resolve modular points quickly early on within the module. As well as, you’ll have the chance to suggestions formally on the finish of your module. These feedback shall be reviewed by your course crew and a few could also be thought of at your annual course enhancement assembly. Your Course Consultant will attend this and current your views to this assembly for dialogue on the assembly. Must you be requesting suggestions in your project by electronic mail, please guarantee that you’re copying your course coordinator in all of your emails exchanged between the tutor and your self.
Upon completion of the module and moderation of your work with our affiliate accomplice Leeds Beckett College, your outcomes shall be posted in your Moodle web page. You may be suggested to examine your outcomes by electronic mail. Within the case you probably did not full the module, you can be requested to retake the Assessment* throughout the deadline set by the establishment.
*This can be subjective relying on the case and gravity of the failure.
6 Understanding Your Assessment Duties
Extenuating Circumstances and Mitigation
If you’re experiencing issues that are adversely affecting your skill to check (referred to as extenuating circumstances), then it is possible for you to to use for mitigation.
RBS operates a match to take a seat/match to submit method to extenuating circumstances which signifies that college students who take their Assessment are robotically declaring themselves match to take action.
Late Submission
In case no extenuating circumstances are filed, commonplace penalties will apply for late submission of project work. A penalty ranging between 5% to 100% of marks achieved shall be utilized relying on the variety of days taken for submission.
Dishonest, Plagiarism and Different Types of Unfair Follow
Educational misconduct happens once you your self have not achieved the work that you just submit. It might additionally embrace dishonest, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion and different types of unfair observe. What is and what is not permitted is clearly defined in The Little E book of Dishonest, Plagiarism and Unfair Follow which is obtainable to view on Moodle.
Kindly discover connected the hyperlink to entry this ebook right here,
(http://moodle.rbs.ac.mu/moodle/pluginfile.php/9742/mod_resource/content material/three/Little_Book_o f_Plagiarism.pdf)
To allow college students to accurately paraphrase their work, please use the hyperlink beneath to entry the quote and unquote ebook.
http://moodle.rbs.ac.mu/moodle/pluginfile.php/9741/mod_resource/content material/three/Quote_Unquot e.pdf
Educational integrity
You might be clearly knowledgeable how your work must be accurately written, referenced and submitted. Ought to there be any suspected plagiarism or educational malpractices with submitted work, this shall be investigated by a proper course of, both internally, externally or each, and which can have extreme penalties.
The Educational Integrity Course of is proven beneath:
Class One
Relevant for Poor Educational Follow for a excessive similarity listed work, investigated internally by the Educational Director of Rushmore Enterprise Faculty
Class Two
Relevant for any case of Educational Misdemeanour or repeat incidence of Class One. This is investigated internally by the Educational Director of Rushmore Enterprise Faculty.
Class Three
Relevant for any case of Educational Misconduct. This is investigated externally by Leeds Beckett College Officers.
Class 4
Relevant for any case of Gross Educational Misconduct and this is investigated externally by Leeds Beckett College Officers.
Please see connected hyperlink for additional detailed rationalization relating to Educational Integrity. (http://moodle.rbs.ac.mu/moodle/mod/useful resource/view.php?id=9384)
7 Abstract of module
SUMMARY OF OVERALL MODULE – BUSINESS ETHICS CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
ASSIGNMENT
START DATE PROGRESS TUTORIAL SUBMISSION DATE
31st Jan 2022 Week eight TBC at 23.59 on Turnitin
NSG 4410 Population Health Nursing
NSG 4410 Population Health Nursing Instructions for the Healthy People Paper The purpose of this paper is to apply research-based, public health objectives to a selected community aggregate. The Healthy People 2030 website will be used by the students. This assignment is based on the aggregate in the community that they student chooses. The paper […]