analyzes the main aspects and purposes of the Miranda warning for criminal suspects as described in the website of the U.S. Constitution Online: http://www.usconstitution.net/miranda.html
Review the five prongs contained in the Miranda warning and their significance to an unaware, uninformed defendant. In your analysis, also consider whether the Miranda warning remains an appropriate balance between defendant’s rights and law enforcement being able to do their job.
In light of public speculation, the Supreme Court is contemplating pulling back the Miranda requirements. Consider this situation and prepare an argument for or against the significance of retaining the Miranda warning. You can cite academic and legal cases in support of your conclusion in 3 to 5 pages.
———-
examines the major features and goals of the Miranda warning for criminal defendants as given on the US Constitution Online website: http://www.usconstitution.net/miranda.html
Examine the Miranda warning’s five prongs and their significance to an uneducated, unwitting defendant. Consider if the Miranda warning is still an appropriate balance between a defendant’s rights and law enforcement’s ability to conduct their job in your review.
The Supreme Court is considering reversing the Miranda provisions in light of public speculation. Consider the situation and prepare an argument for or against keeping the Miranda caution in place. In 3 to 5 pages, you might support your conclusion using academic and legal cases.
