AR300 Art History
Instructions: Be sure you make an digital copy of your reply earlier than submitting it to Ashworth School for grading. Except in any other case acknowledged, reply in full sentences, and make sure to use appropriate English spelling and grammar. Sources have to be cited in APA format. Your response needs to be 4 (Four) pages in size; discuss with the “Task Format” web page for particular format necessities.
Half A Briefly outline artwork historical past as a tutorial discipline based mostly in your understanding of the readings within the textbook Introduction. Subsequent, talk about two of the pure and human threats to artworks that concern modern artwork historians. Present particular examples of threats, the artworks concerned, and the way these threats have an effect on the interpretation of the works by artwork historians. Your dialogue needs to be based mostly on the knowledge within the textbook Introduction and all through the textbook and lecture readings of the primary 4 (Four) classes.
Half B Clarify the development of megalithic structure and dome constructing, tracing its historical past from pre-historic artwork to the Renaissance. Start your dialogue describing the architectural improvements of the tomb in Newgrange, Eire and join these improvements with subsequent examples of the tholos tombs in Greece, to the Pantheon in Rome and conclude with the Florence Cathedral. Your dialogue ought to embody a definition of phrases you employ as outlined within the textbook readings and reveal an understanding of the connections these buildings have in frequent.
Works of structure to incorporate in your Half B dialogue:
1. Tomb, Newgrange, Eire. c. 3000-2500 BCE. Situated on web page 29 within the textbook.
2. Inside of tholos tomb, Mycenae, Greece. c. 1300-1200 BCE. Situated on web page 100 within the textbook.
Three. Pantheon, Rome. 110-128 CE. Situated on web page 148 and 149 within the textbook.
Four. Filippo Brunelleschi, Dome of Florence Cathedral. 1420-1436 CE. Situated on web page 307 of the textbook.
Grading Rubric
Please discuss with the rubric on the subsequent web page for the grading standards for this project.
CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable
25 Factors20 Factors15 Factors10 Factors
Pupil offers a transparent,
logical definition of artwork
historical past and identifies
two or extra pure and
human threats to
artworks, offers
paintings examples and
the implications of those
threats to artwork historians.
Pupil offers a
largely clear, logical
definition of artwork historical past
and identifies two
pure and human
threats to artworks,
offers paintings
examples and the
implications of those
threats to artwork historians,
although could not absolutely
develop all ideas.
Pupil offers a
weak or unclear
definition of artwork historical past
and/or identifies solely
one pure and human
menace to artworks,
overlooks paintings
examples and/or the
implications of those
threats to artwork historians,
thus doesn’t embody
full growth
of all ideas.
Pupil offers a
poor dialogue or no
inclusion of any of
these components of the
project: defintion
of artwork historical past;
dialogue of the
human threats to
artworks; offers no
examples of artworks;
or the implications of
the threats to artwork
historians.
25 Factors20 Factors15 Factors10 Factors
Pupil offers a transparent
and logical dialogue of
the 2 tomb
architectural artworks
together with a definition of
phrases as discovered within the
textbook and
demonstrates an
glorious understanding
of the architectural
improvements mentioned by
the scholar.
Pupil offers a
largely clear and logical
dialogue of the 2
tomb architectural
artworks together with a
definition of phrases as
discovered within the textbook.
Pupil demonstrates
some understanding of
the architectural
improvements described
and outlined, however does
not absolutely develop all
ideas of the
improvements.
Pupil offers a
weak or unclear
understanding of the
architectural
improvements resulting in
the creation of the
dome as mentioned in
the textbook referring to
the 2 tomb artworks.
Pupil demonstrates
some understanding,
however total doesn’t
present proof of a
good understanding of
the ideas of the
improvements.
Pupil offers a
poor dialogue of the
architectural
improvements of the 2
artworks. This will likely
embody not defining
the phrases or
demonstrating a poor
understanding of the
phrases and architectural
improvements resulting in
the creation of the
dome.
25 Factors20 Factors15 Factors10 Factors
Pupil offers a transparent
and logical dialogue of
the 2 dome artworks
together with a definition of
phrases as discovered within the
textbook and
demonstrates an
glorious understanding
of the architectural
improvements mentioned by
the scholar.
Pupil offers a
largely clear and logical
dialogue of the 2
dome artworks together with
a definition of phrases as
discovered within the textbook.
Pupil demonstrates
some understanding of
the architectural
improvements described
and outlined, however does
not absolutely develop all
ideas of the
improvements.
Pupil offers a
weak or unclear
understanding of the
architectural
improvements of the
dome as mentioned in
the textbook referring to
the 2 dome artworks.
Pupil demonstrates
some understanding,
however total doesn’t
present proof of a
good understanding of
the ideas of the
improvements.
Pupil offers a
poor dialogue of the
architectural
improvements of the 2
dome artworks. This
could embody not
defining the phrases or
demonstrating a poor
understanding of the
phrases and architectural
improvements of the
dome.
10 factors eight factors 5 factors 2 factors
Pupil doesn’t make
any errors in grammar or
spelling, particularly these
that distract the reader
from the content material.
Pupil makes 1-2 errors
in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader
from the content material.
Pupil makes Three-Four
errors in grammar or
spelling that distract the
reader from the
content material.
Pupil makes extra
than Four errors in
grammar or spelling
that distract the reader
from the content material.
15 factors 12 factors eight factors 5 factors
The paper is written in
correct APA and
organizational format.
Pupil makes use of the
textbook and/or lecture
notes as sources. All
quotes and info are cited
appropriately. Wonderful
group, together with a
number of considerate
transitions.
The paper is written in
correct format with solely
1-2 errors. Pupil makes use of
the textbook and/or
lecture notes as
sources. All quotes
and info are cited
appropriately. Sufficient
group features a
number of acceptable
transitions.
The paper is written in
correct format with solely
Three-5 errors. Exterior
sources are used for
quotes and info and are
credible and cited
appropriately. Essay is poorly
organized, however could
embody a number of efficient
transitions.
The paper will not be
written in correct
format. Many sources
used for quotes and
info are lower than
credible (suspect)
and/or usually are not cited
appropriately. Essay is
disorganized and does
not embody efficient
transitions.
Format – APA
Format,
Citations,
Group,
Transitions (15
Factors)
Half A (25
Factors): Analyzes
artwork historical past as an
tutorial
self-discipline and
pure and
human threats to
artworks
Half B (25
Factors): Outline
and summarize
the architectural
improvements that
result in the
creation of the
dome within the
Newgrange
tombs and tholos
tombs.
Half B (25
Factors): Outline
and summarize
the architectural
improvements
particular to the
dome as seen in
the Pantheon in
Rome and the
Florence
Cathedral.
Mechanics (10
Factors)
