SC 270 Herzing University Sustainable Community Paper & PPT
SC 270 Herzing University Sustainable Community Paper & PPT
Unit 7 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan Final
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 140
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS
Instructions
Assessment TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PLAN FINAL
In this last phase of the Environmental Literacy Plan, include the following:
How can you educate those around you on how to protect the environment and its resources?
Discuss ways to live more sustainably. Include a minimum of five (5) ways.
Create a sustainable community. What does a sustainable community look like?
Compile the information that you have collected over the last 7 units into one cohesive document.
After finalizing the plan, record a 7-10 minute presentation about the plan that highlights the key components of the plan. Include visuals in the presentation (PowerPoint, Prezi, Slideshow, etc.). The audience of this plan would be your community and the presentation should be on the environmental impacts that are happening in your community and how as a community the impacts could be lessened.
Suggestions on how to record the presentation are in the Read Me First Section of the course. Upload the presentation to YouTube.
Validate your statements and opinions with supporting evidence (citations and references) in APA form.
Submit:
A 7-10 minute presentation video uploaded to YouTube. Provide a link to the video. If the video is a small video size you can upload it to the submission as well.
Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase VII (PDF or Word document)
Estimated time to complete: 5 hours
Assignment Files
Environmental Literacy Plan Template – Phase VIIPreview the document [Word document]
Rubric
SC270 Unit 7 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan Final
SC270 Unit 7 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan Final
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSC270-CO3
42.0 ptsLevel 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.
38.0 ptsLevel 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.
34.0 ptsLevel 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.
29.0 ptsLevel 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.
25.0 ptsLevel 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions
42.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
42.0 ptsLevel 5
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
38.0 ptsLevel 4
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
34.0 ptsLevel 3
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
29.0 ptsLevel 2
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
25.0 ptsLevel 1
Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.
42.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
28.0 ptsLevel 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.
25.0 ptsLevel 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.
22.0 ptsLevel 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.
20.0 ptsLevel 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.
17.0 ptsLevel 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.
28.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
21.0 ptsLevel 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
19.0 ptsLevel 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
17.0 ptsLevel 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication
15.0 ptsLevel 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
13.0 ptsLevel 1
The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 ptsLevel 0
The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
21.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
7.0 ptsLevel 5
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.
6.0 ptsLevel 4
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.
5.0 ptsLevel 3
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.
4.0 ptsLevel 2
In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.
3.0 ptsLevel 1
The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements
0.0 ptsLevel 0
There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
7.0 pts
Total Points: 140.0
