Remote care in the future of nursing
Purpose
The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO 1: Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
Total points possible: 160 points
Preparing the assignment:
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
1) Students will be placed into groups by the end of the second week of the session. The groups will work together to select a practice problem of interest as the focus for the three RUA assignments in this course. The practice topic of interest will also be used to complete week 3 and week 5 independent student assignments, as well as a group PowerPoint presentation in week 7.
a. Individuals will complete this assignment independently for weeks 3 and 5.
b. Teams must assure that members do not use the same articles when completing this assignment.
c. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
d. Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length. Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 -page length.
2) The paper will include the following sections:
a. Clinical Question (45 points/28%)
• Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work?
• Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
• PICOT question in support of the group topic.
• State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is like a problem
statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”
b. Levels of Evidence (20 points/13%)
• Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).
• What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?
c. Search Strategy (65 points/41%)
• List search terms and results.
• Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.
• Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?
• Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).
d. Format (30 points/18%)
• Correct grammar and spelling.
• Include a title page.
• Use of headings for each section.
Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion
• Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.
• 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.
For writing Helpance, visit the Writing Center.
Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned.
Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.
Assignment Section and Required Criteria
(Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present
Clinical Question (45 points/28%) 45 points 40 points 37 points 33 points 0 points
Required criteria
1. Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
3. PICOT question in support of the group topic.
4. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is similar
to a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .” Includes 4 requirements. Includes 3 requirements. Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. No requirements for this section presented.
Levels of Evidence (20 points/13%) 20 points 16 points 10 points 0 points
Required criteria
1. Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).
2. What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)? Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. Incomplete or inaccurate information presented. No requirements for this section presented.
Search Strategy (65 points/41%) 65 points 58 points 54 points 48 points 0 points
Required criteria
1. List search terms and results.
2. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.
3. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?
4. Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years). Includes 4 requirements. Includes 3 requirements. Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. No requirements for this section presented.
Organization and APA Style (30 points/18%) 30 points 27 points 25 points 15 points 0 points
Required criteria
1. Correct grammar and spelling.
2. Include a title page.
3. Use of headings for each section.
4. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.
6. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. Includes 6 requirements. Includes 5 requirements. Includes 3-4 requirements. Includes 1-2 requirements. No requirements for this section presented.
Total Points Possible = 160 points
===>
The topic of remote care in the future of nursing is a crucial area of focus as technology advancements continue to shape the healthcare industry. Remote care, also known as telehealth, refers to the delivery of healthcare services remotely through technology such as video conferencing, remote monitoring, and electronic communication.
The significance of remote care in the future of nursing is that it can improve patient outcomes by increasing access to healthcare for those who live in remote or underserved areas, reducing the need for in-person visits, and enabling more efficient and timely communication between healthcare providers. Additionally, it can also improve cost-effectiveness by reducing the need for travel and in-person visits.
A potential PICOT question for this topic could be: In older adults with chronic diseases who live in remote areas, how does the implementation of remote care compared to traditional in-person care affect patient outcomes and healthcare costs over a 6 month period?
The purpose of this paper is to identify and evaluate the most relevant research on remote care in the future of nursing, specifically focusing on its impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
In terms of levels of evidence, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) would be the best type of evidence to answer this question as it allows for the examination of cause-and-effect relationships between the implementation of remote care and patient outcomes.
The search strategy for this topic would involve searching databases such as PubMed and CINAHL using relevant keywords such as “telehealth,” “remote care,” “telemedicine,” “telehealth and older adults,” “telehealth and chronic diseases,” etc. Refinement decisions may include limiting the search to only include studies published within the last 5 years, as well as studies that focus on older adults with chronic diseases living in remote areas.
The two most relevant articles found through this search strategy would be evaluated for their relevance to the topic, the rigor of their methodology, and the quality of their results. These articles would be used as primary sources for further analysis and discussion in the paper.
