Week 6 Assignment – Job Satisfaction vs. Organizational Commitment
This assignment will build on the first assignment, with a deeper focus on motivation and performance management.
Thinking again about your previous and current work experiences, consider what is more important to you: job satisfaction or organizational commitment. In this paper you will explain your choice, your rationale for that choice, and how it has impacted your work performance, as well as identify motivational theories and their impact on employees.
Write a 2–3 page paper (excluding the title page and reference page in the count) in which you respond to the following:
What is more important to you: job satisfaction or organizational commitment, and why?
How has that impacted your work performance?
What motivational theory is used for performance management purposes by your organization, and what is the impact on employee morale?
You will need to reference at least three quality sources in your paper.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For Helpance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Examine employee work performance and motivational theory in the context of a real-world organization
______________
Job satisfaction and organizational commitment are both important for employee engagement and retention. Job satisfaction refers to how much an individual likes their job, while organizational commitment is the degree to which an employee identifies with and is involved in their organization. In my opinion, job satisfaction is more important to me than organizational commitment.
The reason for my preference is that I believe job satisfaction directly impacts an employee’s motivation and performance, whereas organizational commitment may not necessarily do so. When employees are satisfied with their job, they are more likely to be engaged, productive, and committed to their work. On the other hand, an employee may have a high level of organizational commitment but may not necessarily be happy with their job, which could lead to lower motivation and productivity.
My personal experience has taught me that when I am satisfied with my job, I am more motivated to perform well and contribute to the organization’s success. When I am unhappy with my job, I may still have a high level of commitment to the organization, but I may not be as productive or engaged in my work.
One motivational theory that is used for performance management purposes in many organizations is the goal-setting theory. This theory suggests that specific and challenging goals, along with feedback and support, can motivate employees to improve their performance. The impact of this theory on employee morale can be positive if the goals are achievable and aligned with the employee’s interests and abilities. However, if the goals are unrealistic or not relevant to the employee’s role, it may lead to demotivation and dissatisfaction.
While both job satisfaction and organizational commitment are important for employee engagement and retention, my preference is for job satisfaction. Job satisfaction has a direct impact on motivation and performance, which ultimately contributes to the organization’s success. The goal-setting theory is one motivational theory used for performance management, and its impact on employee morale depends on how well the goals align with the employee’s interests and abilities.
