at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e1764
Contents lists obtainable
Social Science & Drugs
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/find/socscimed
Feeding her youngsters, but risking her well being: The intersection of gender, family meals insecurity and weight problems
Molly A. Martin*, Adam M. Lippert Pennsylvania State College, 211 Oswald Tower, College Park, PA 16802, United States
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article historical past: Accessible on-line 20 December 2011
Key phrases: Obese Weight problems Gender Meals insecurity Parenting Earnings USA
* Corresponding writer. Tel.: þ1 814 863 5508. E-mail deal with: mmartin@pop.psu.edu (M.A. Mart
0277-9536/$ e see entrance matter � 2012 Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.013
a b s t r a c t
This paper investigates one rationalization for the constant remark of a robust, detrimental correlation in the USA between earnings and weight problems amongst girls, but not males. We argue key issue is the gendered expectation that moms are chargeable for feeding their youngsters. When earnings is proscribed and households face meals shortages, we predict that an enactment of these gendered norms locations moms at larger threat for weight problems relative to child-free girls and all males. We undertake an oblique strategy to check these advanced dynamics utilizing knowledge on women and men of childrearing age and who’re family heads or companions within the 1999e2003 waves of the Panel Examine of Earnings Dynamics (PSID). We discover help for our prediction: Meals insecure moms are extra doubtless than child-free women and men and meals insecure fathers to be obese or overweight and to realize extra weight over 4 years. The dangers are larger for single moms relative to moms in married or cohabiting relationships. Supplemental fashions show that this sample can’t be attributed topost-pregnancy organic modifications thatpredispose moms toweight achieve or an evolutionary bias towards organic youngsters. Additional, outcomes are unchanged with the inclusion of bodily exercise, smoking, consuming, receipt of meals stamps, or Ladies, Infants and Kids (WIC) dietary program participation. Weight problems, thus, provides a bodily expression of the vulnerabilities that come up from the intersection of gendered childcare expectations and poverty.
� 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Students argue that it takes cash to take care of a wholesome weight in America’s obesogenic surroundings (Poston & Foreyt, 1999) as a result of wholesome meals is comparatively costly and calorie-dense, nutrient-poor meals is affordable (Drewnowski & Specter, 2004). Though weight is a operate of each caloric consumption and expendi- ture, materialist arguments give attention to the prices of meals and predict larger caloric consumption and consequent physique fats amongst low versus excessive earnings folks (Glass & McAtee, 2006). Within the U.S., there’s a sturdy, detrimental correlation between earnings and the probability of being obese or overweight, but solely amongst girls; this isn’t noticed amongst males (for opinions, see McLaren, 2007; Sobal & Stunkard, 1989). This intercourse distinction is puzzling, notably to students who look past particular person explanations to contemplate the function of shared environments for well being as a result of the bulk of women and men dwell collectively (Casper & Bianchi, 2002) and share socioeconomic assets and weight-related behaviors (French, Story, & Jeffery, 2001; Mitchell et al., 2003). Given these common- alities, one would anticipate larger similarity between the sexes.
We hypothesize that the important thing distinction will not be between all girls and all males, but between moms and non-mothers. We
in).
All rights reserved.
argue that the confluence of two components e the expertise of meals insecurity and the gendered nature of childcare e intersect and contribute to the noticed intercourse variations within the affiliation of earnings and physique weight. Meals insecurity is very correlated with poverty (Sarlio-Lähteenkorva & Lahelma, 2001) and happens when a family faces budgetary constraints that restrict the amount or high quality of meals they will buy (Wunderlich & Norwood, 2006). But meals insecurity is a “managed course of” (Radimer, 1990), that means that households strategize and diligently work to keep away from starvation. That duty, nevertheless, falls extra closely on girls given conventional discourses about household life and “girls’s work” that place larger expectations on girls for feeding and nurturing their household, particularly when youngsters are current (DeVault, 1991). On condition that meals insecurity is correlated with poor dietary conduct and weight problems (for a overview, see Institute of Drugs, 2011), we assert that meals insecurity mediates the affiliation between earnings and weight, but that the administration of meals insecurity intersects with gender to create differential dangers for weight problems between moms and non-mothers.
To research these dynamics, we research women and men of childrearing ages (i.e., 18e55) who’re heads or companions of U.S. households within the 1999, 2001 and 2003 waves of the Panel Examine of Earnings Dynamics (PSID). We take a look at whether or not the affiliation between
mailto:mmartin@pop.psu.edu
www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02779536
http://www.elsevier.com/find/socscimed
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.013
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e1764 1755
family meals insecurity and the probability of being obese or overweight differs throughout teams outlined by intercourse and parenthood in cross-sectional fashions of weight standing and longitudinal fashions of weight change. We additionally look at how associate co-residence additional moderates these processes as a result of gendered norms about parental custody (Coltrane & Adams, 2003) and the larger prev- alence of meals insecurity amongst single mother and father (Rose, Gundersen, & Oliveira, 1998).
Meals insecurity and weight
Family meals safety exists alongside a continuum but could be categorized right into a four-point ordered scale: meals safe, meals insufficiency, low meals safety, and really low meals safety (Bickel, Nord, Worth, Hamilton, & Cook dinner, 2000; Wunderlich & Norwood, 2006). Most People are meals safe, but some face meals insuf- ficiency, that means, they fear about having sufficient cash to purchase meals for the month, but truly make no or few modifications to their weight loss plan (Wunderlich & Norwood, 2006). Meals insecurity happens when these fears turn into a actuality. Low meals safety, or not having the means to purchase the sorts of meals desired, reduces the standard and selection of folks’s diets (Wunderlich & Norwood, 2006). Very low meals safety happens when folks should not have the means to purchase the amount of meals wanted and leads folks to skip meals and scale back their meals consumption (Wunderlich & Norwood, 2006). These with both “low meals safety” or “very low meals safety” are thought-about “meals insecure” (Wunderlich & Norwood, 2006). In 2009, 14.7% of U.S. households had been meals insecure (Nord, Coleman-Jensen, Andrews, & Carlson, 2010), whereas in 2003, the 12 months akin to our research, the prevalence was 11.2% (Nord, Andrews, & Carlson, 2004).
As a result of poverty predicts meals insecurity (Sarlio-Lähteenkorva & Lahelma, 2001), there are a number of parallels present in analysis on the roleof meals safety for physique weight. Keyamong them are constant intercourse variations, such that low meals safety is linked to being over- weight (Adams, Grummer-Strawn, & Chavez, 2003; Dinour, Bergen, & Yeh, 2007; Lyons, Park, & Nelson, 2008; Townsend, Peerson, Love, Achterberg, & Murphy, 2001) and gaining 5 kilos or extra in a single 12 months (Wilde & Peterman, 2006), but solely amongst girls. Very low meals safety is related to being underweight, but once more just for girls (Wilde & Peterman, 2006).
A number of research counsel that meals insecurity is linked to over- weight and weight problems on account of administration methods folks undertake within the face of financial constraints. Meals insecure people usually tend to eat high-calorie but nutritionally-poor meals to keep away from emotions of starvation (Dixon, Winkleby, & Radimer, 2001; Drewnowski & Specter, 2004; Kirkpatrick & Tarasuk, 2008), eat irregular meals or skip breakfast (Kempson, Keenan, Sadani, Ridlen, & Rosato, 2002; Ma et al., 2003), and eat much less milk, fruit and greens, particularly later within the month (Tarasuk, McIntyre, & Li, 2007). In keeping with public well being and diet analysis, these dietary practices are related to being obese (Ledikwe et al., 2006; Ma et al., 2003) and weight achieve (Berkey, Rockett, Gillman, Area, & Colditz, 2003). Within the subsequent part, we element how the administration of meals insecurity is gendered.
Gender, childcare, and meals insecurity administration
Conventional discourses about “household” life and “girls’s work” for the reason that industrial revolution embrace expectations that ladies are chargeable for caring for his or her members of the family and managing family duties (Rothman, 1978; Sokoloff, 1980). When youngsters are current within the dwelling, these obligations multiply (Hays, 1998) and the gendered division of family labor turns into extra unequal (Coltrane, 2000). For instance, there’s larger gender fairness within the complete quantity of hours spent on housekeeping in
child-free cohabiting and married than amongst related with youngsters (Sanchez & Thomson, 1997; South & Spitze, 1994). Subsequently, moms usually tend to be subjected to, internalize, and mirror conventional gender expectations about their roles and obligations than child-free girls.
A key female duty is “feeding the household,” which requires a sequence of duties: meal planning, monitoring the provision of family provisions, buying, cooking, and cleansing (DeVault, 1991). Past the sensible targets, “feeding the household” additionally sustains youngsters’s emotional wants for love, help and safety (DeVault, 1991).
In meals insecure properties, moms work onerous to forestall starvation amongst their youngsters. In a qualitative research with regularly meals insecure younger moms, all insisted that their youngsters solely expe- rienced meals insufficiency as a result of they adopted a number of methods to guard them (Stevens, 2010), together with prioritizing their chil- dren’s wants over their very own (McIntyre et al., 2003; Stevens, 2010). As DeVault notes “[t]hese girls appear to be expressing a heightened sense of the extra widespread notion that’s girls’s personal meals is much less essential than that ready for others” (1991, p.199). As one lady in a cash-strapped family famous: “If it will get right down to it, we purchase to feed the youngsters” (DeVault, 1991, p.191).
To handle meals insecurity, moms undertake a spread of methods. Some methods give attention to grocery buying, like shopping for in bulk, buying at completely different shops to get the very best costs, or utilizing coupons (DeVault, 1991; Wiig & Smith, 2008). Different methods contain moms’ meals consumption. Meals insecure moms skip meals, wait to eat till later within the day, or eat much less to spare their youngsters from starvation and dietary deprivation (Badun, Evers, & Hooper,1995; DeVault, 1991; McIntyre, Connor, & Warren, 2000; McIntyre et al., 2003). Because of this, girls in meals insecure households are in danger of nutrient deficiencies in Vitamin A, folate, iron, and magnesium (Tarasuk & Beaton, 1999). We suspect that these behavioral patterns under- gird the unexplained intercourse variations within the affiliation between meals insecurity and weight (Adams et al., 2003; Dinour et al., 2007; Lyons et al., 2008; Olson, 1999; Townsend et al., 2001; Wilde & Peterman, 2006) and why meals insecurity is often not corre- lated with youngsters’s weight (Gundersen, Garasky, & Lohman, 2009; Martin & Ferris, 2007), but for an exception see Gundersen and Kreider (2009). Sadly we should not have direct measures on folks’s dietary conduct or meals insecurity administration practices to completely discover this sequence, but we do have the requisite knowledge to check our main speculation:
H1. There’s a statistically vital affiliation between meals insecurity and being obese or overweight for moms, but not child-free girls or all males.
We all know of just one paper about meals insecurity and weight problems that emphasizes parenthood. With a pattern of mother and father (65% of whom had been single moms), Martin and Ferris (2007) discovered a optimistic affiliation between meals insecurity and weight problems, but they didn’t discover whether or not there was a differential affiliation between moms and dads. Subsequently, the present Assessment makes a major contribution by providing an preliminary take a look at of this speculation.
The function of marriage and cohabitation
We predict that the dwelling preparations of heterosexual women and men additional situation the variations between moms and non-mothers. Prior analysis demonstrates that caretaking duties amongst separated mother and father are largely carried out by the custodial mum or dad, usually the mom (Furstenberg & Cherlin, 1994; Marsiglio, Amato, Day, & Lamb, 2000). Subsequently, the dangers of obese on account of meals insecurity ought to be exacerbated amongst
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e17641756
single moms and comparatively decrease for moms in co-residential couple households. Likewise, single fathers ought to be at larger threat of weight problems when they’re meals insecure. Sadly, we have now too few single fathers in our knowledge to completely discover this chance as a result of most single mother and father are single moms (Casper & Bianchi, 2002), reflecting a “group division of labor” (DeVault, 1991, p.193) whereby girls routinely have custody after mother and father separate. Our second speculation is:
H2. The affiliation between meals insecurity and being over- weight or overweight is stronger for single moms versus married or cohabiting moms.
You will need to be aware, nevertheless, that the causal relationships between obese, household formation, union dissolution, and family meals safety are advanced. Actually, the causal course of might work in the wrong way: Obese girls could also be much less more likely to kind unions and bear youngsters given female magnificence beliefs emphasizing thinness (Allon, 1982).
Various explanations
We predict that meals insecurity and its administration will increase the dangers of obese and weight problems for moms given the gendered expectations of childrearing. We acknowledge, nevertheless, that there are competing explanations and we do our greatest to deal with them.
First, one could agree with our prediction but disagree with our interpretation. One could think about any noticed dangers for moms as reflecting, not childrearing, but organic dangers of childbearing. If metabolic modifications associated to being pregnant predispose start moms to realize weight, then meals insecure organic moms could be at larger threat of obese and weight problems than “social” moms. Such variations might additionally come up if, on account of evolutionary pressures, moms are extra protecting of their organic youngsters (Daly & Wilson, 1980). To check whether or not the expertise of being pregnant or organic kinship creates distinctive dangers, we conduct two supple- psychological analyses. First, we prohibit our pattern to solely girls dwelling with youngsters (50% of the pattern) and evaluate whether or not the danger of weight problems for meals insecure moms is decrease amongst girls dwelling with youngsters they didn’t give start to (i.e., they’re adoptive, step, or foster moms), controlling for the quantity of youngsters current. As a result of most ladies dwell solely with organic youngsters, statistical energy points could restrict our potential to detect a major distinction. Second, we prohibit our pattern to girls who’ve ever given start by 2003 and look at whether or not the dangers of family meals inse- curity enhance as parity will increase, regardless of whether or not their youngsters at the moment dwell with her and controlling for her age and different demographic traits. As a result of 89% of the ladies in our pattern have given start by 2003, energy is much less of an issue in these analyses. If metabolic modifications related to being pregnant undergird our findings, then one would anticipate these dangers to build up with every start and, thus, translate right into a statistically vital interplay between parity and meals insecurity amongst organic moms.
Second, one may argue that the statistical affiliation between meals insecurity and obese is a operate of different sociodemo- graphic components apart from earnings. Thus, we management for standing char- acteristics, like age, schooling and race/ethnicity in all fashions.
Third, one may anticipate that different mediating components clarify these patterns, particularly on condition that we should not have self-reported measures of power consumption or, even higher, knowledge from doubly- labeled water exams to measure their power consumption (Schoeller, 1990). We take a look at a number of different mechanisms. As a result of meals insecure moms could have fewer alternatives for leisure bodily exercise, we take a look at whether or not variations in self-reported bodily exercise scale back the affiliation between meals insecurity
and weight amongst moms. We additionally take a look at whether or not the consumption of alcohol or smoking cigarettes explains the noticed patterns. As a result of of the stresses related to poverty and meals insecurity (Huddleston-Casas, Charnigo, & Simmons, 2009), which might doubtless really feel extra threatening to oldsters, meals insecure mother and father could possibly be extra more likely to self-soothe themselves with alcohol and nicotine. But these behaviors are related to being obese (Mokdad et al., 2003; Slattery et al., 1992). Lastly, given the longstanding debate about whether or not receiving meals stamps (now formally the Supplemental Diet Help Program) will increase the dangers for obese and weight problems (Borjas, 2004; Gibson, 2003; Institute of Drugs, 2011), we take a look at whether or not our outcomes change with the inclusion of meals stamps receipt. We additionally embrace a measure of participation within the Ladies, Infants and Kids (WIC) dietary program.
In sum, we bridge a number of empirical literatures to develop a brand new theoretical mannequin about how gendered patterns of childcare intersect with family economics to extend the danger of over- weight amongst poor, meals insecure moms. We acknowledge that there are a number of different explanations and, thus, do our greatest to check them with the obtainable knowledge. Our intention is to offer an preliminary examination of whether or not obese and weight problems are bodily expressions of the vulnerabilities that come up from the intersection of gender, parenthood, and poverty.
Knowledge and strategies
Knowledge
We use knowledge from the Panel Examine of Earnings Dynamics (PSID) as a result of it’s the solely research that collects knowledge on people’ weight, earnings, family meals insecurity, and family composition. Sadly, PSID doesn’t have details about particular person’s power consumption and meals insecurity administration.
PSID is a longitudinal household-based research that started col- lecting knowledge in 1968 for a nationally consultant pattern and an oversample of low-income, Southern households (Hill, 1992). The PSID comprises longitudinal knowledge for all people who had been ever in a PSID family, even when they transfer out (Hill, 1992). Interviews since 1997 are carried out biennially. On condition that the PSID has been fielded for nearly 50 years, pattern attrition might pose an issue, but a number of research have discovered that attrition has not affected PSID’s representativeness (Becketti, Gould, Lillard, & Welch, 1988; Fitzgerald, Gottschalk, & Moffitt, 1998). PSID will not be consultant, nevertheless, of immigrant teams arriving within the U.S. after 1968.
We make a number of restrictions to reach at our analytic pattern. First, we should depend on knowledge collected in 1999, 2001, and 2003, the years through which PSID collected knowledge on each weight and meals inse- curity. Second, we prohibit our Assessment to those that had been both the top of a PSID family or their marital or cohabiting associate in 1999, 2001, and 2003 (n ¼ 9935) as a result of PSID solely collects knowledge on physique weight for these people. Whereas this supplies for a constant pattern throughout the assorted fashions, it makes the pattern extra selective with regard to household construction stability. Our substantive findings are unchanged, nevertheless, in analyses the place the info are multiply imputed to incorporate anybody who meets the restrictions listed beneath and was ever within the PSID between 1999 and 2003, regardless of their relationship to the family head. Third, we prohibit the Assessment to heads and companions between the ages of 18 and 55 in 1999 (n ¼ 8151) to give attention to adults most in danger for dwelling with minor youngsters and, thus, the hypothesized patterns. The subsequent two restrictions get rid of outlier circumstances that will chal- lenge the statistical homogeneity of our Assessment. Fourth, we drop those that report being international born (n ¼ 82) or who could be moderately assumed to be international born as a result of they’ve 5 or
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e1764 1757
fewer years of accomplished education (and the minimal age of obligatory education in the USA is 16) (n ¼ 51). These people are distinctive in each unobserved and noticed methods (i.e., their means and correlations for meals insecurity, quantity of chil- dren, marital standing and weight differ considerably) as a result of the PSID will not be consultant of immigrants. The absence of immi- grants reduces the prevalence of meals insecurity within the research (Borjas, 2004). Fifth, we omit girls who’re pregnant on the time of the 2003 interview (n ¼ 85). Particularly, we omit girls reporting a dwell start within the PSID’s Childbirth and Adoption Historical past File inside 9 months following their 2003 interview date. After these restrictions, our pattern is 7931 adults.
Missingdata dueto merchandise non-response is comparatively minor in these knowledge. There are literally no lacking knowledge for folks’s intercourse, age, part- nership standing, the quantity of co-residential youngsters, urbanicity, and family earnings (as a result of the PSID has imputed it). There’s minor merchandise non-response on meals insecurity (n1999 ¼ 9, n2001 ¼ 11, n2003 ¼ 20), self-rated well being (n2003 ¼ 86), race (n ¼ 129), and girls’s fertility histories (n ¼ 36). The objects with probably the most lacking knowledge are physique mass index (n1999 ¼ 379 [4% of the original 9935 sample], n2001 ¼ 257 [3%], n2003 ¼ 305 [3%]) and schooling (n2003 ¼ 596 [6%]). We make the most of a number of imputation deal with merchandise non- response, which replaces lacking values with predictions from info noticed within the pattern (Rubin, 1987). We use the supplemental program “ice” inside STATA 11.zero (Royston, 2005a,b) to create 5 imputed knowledge units. The imputation fashions embrace all of the variables and their interactions which are used within the empirical fashions, in addition to the respondent’s work standing, occupation, and area (all in 2003), the quantity of adults within the family (in 1999, 2001, 2003), whethertheylivewithayoungchild(ages0e5;in 2003) and whether or not PSID imputed their earnings. We estimate the empirical fashions for every imputed knowledge set after which mix the outcomes, accounting for the variance inside and between the imputed samples to calculate the coefficients’ customary errors (Rubin, 1987).
Measures
Physique weight We decide folks’s weight classification in three steps. First,
as a result of PSID solely has self-reported weight and since self- reported weight is usually biased downward amongst girls and upward amongst males (Cawley & Burkhauser, 2006), we use the Cawley (2004; Cawley & Burkhauser, 2006) changes to enhance the accuracy of our dependent variable. Particularly, we multiply respondents’ self-reported weight by race- and sex-specific coeffi- cients from Cawley’s regressions of measured weight on self- reported weight. Second, we calculate their physique mass index (BMI) [weight (kg)/height2 (m2)] from their self-reported top and their Cawley-adjusted self-reported weight. Third, we observe World Well being Group (2000) tips to categorise BMI into the next weight classes: underweight (BMI < 18.5), regular weight (18.5 � BMI < 25), obese (25 � BMI < 30) and overweight (BMI � 30). Within the cross-sectional fashions, we predict whether or not an individual is (1) regular weight or underweight, (2) obese, or (three) overweight in 2003. As a result of lower than 2% of the pattern is underweight, we can’t mannequin underweight as a separate class. For the longitudinal fashions, we predict their weight change (in kilos) between 1999 and 2003, merely calculated as their Cawley-adjusted 2003 weight minus their Cawley-adjusted 1999 weight.
Family meals insecurity We use the U.S. Division of Agriculture’s Meals Safety Scale
(Bickel et al., 2000). Respondents had been requested a sequential sequence of 18 questions in the event that they dwell with youngsters and 10 questions if they don’t. The completely different sequence are made equal (and thus orthogonal
to the presence of youngsters) within the ultimate 10-point scale and cate- gorical measure of meals safety. Following the USDA’s tips, households are categorized as meals insecure (¼1) in the event that they rating a 2.2 or larger on the Meals Safety Scale (Bickel et al., 2000). We measure their family meals insecurity in 2003 and create a longitudinal measure that counts the survey years with reported family meals insecurity between 1999 and 2003 (values: zero, 1, 2, or three).
Intercourse Intercourse is a dichotomous indicator for whether or not the individual is feminine
(1 ¼ sure) or male.
Kids PSID members report the quantity of youngsters between the
ages of zero and 17 years at the moment within the family, regardless of their organic relationship to the family head or their associate. We create a dichotomous measure indicating youngsters are current (¼1) and a depend of youngsters current.
We use the PSID’s Childbirth and Adoption Historical past (1985e2007) knowledge to create two variables. First, amongst these dwelling with youngsters in 2003, we decide whether or not the girl gave start to each youngster current and create a dichotomous variable equal to at least one if she didn’t. As a result of only a few girls dwell with a mixture of organic and non-biological youngsters (N ¼ 14), the outcomes primarily mirror whether or not girls who didn’t give start to any of the kids current (N ¼ 307) are completely different. Second, we calculate the whole quantity of youngsters a girl has ever borne.
Within the longitudinal fashions, we use a variable that equals the differencebetween thenumberofchildrenpresentin2003and 1999.
Associate co-residence To check adults in numerous residential relationships, we
estimate fashions individually for many who are single and those that are who’re dwelling with a romantic associate, whether or not married or cohabiting.
Various mediating variables Supplemental fashions embrace the next variables, reported
in 2003: being a “present smoker” (¼1), the quantity of alcoholic drinks consumed per day (zero ¼ none,1 ¼ lower than one a day, 2 ¼ 1 to 2 per day, three ¼ three to four a day, and four ¼ 5 or extra a day), bouts of “heavy” bodily exercise over the past month (PSID-provided examples embrace aerobics, operating, swimming, strenuous house- work), bouts of “gentle” bodily exercise over the past month (PSID-provided examples embrace strolling, , gardening, bowling), receipt of meals stamps in 2001 (¼1), and receipt of WIC in 2002 (¼1).
Management variables To regulate for confounding variables, we embrace age (in years),
schooling (in years of accomplished education), poor self-rated well being (zero ¼ “good,” “excellent,” or “wonderful,” 1 ¼ “poor” or “honest”), incapacity standing (1 ¼ a minimum of one limitation within the Actions of Every day Dwelling Scale, zero ¼ none), and metropolitan residence (zero ¼ non- metropolitan space, 1 ¼ metropolitan space). Race is measured with three dichotomous variables to check (1) non-Hispanic African People, (2) Hispanics, and (three) non-Hispanic different racial teams to non-Hispanic Whites (the reference class).
Assessment
For the cross-sectional Assessment, we estimate a number of ordinal logistic regression fashions in STATA (v. 11) to foretell 2003 weight classes. The outcomes are substantively much like these from multinomial logistic regression fashions. (Outcomes obtainable upon
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e17641758
request.) For the longitudinal fashions, we make an extra knowledge restriction. We omit individuals who report gaining (n ¼ 73 [averaged across imputations]) or dropping (n ¼ 50 [consistent across imputa- tions]) a minimum of 75 kilos in between 1999 and 2003 as a result of such dramatic modifications doubtless mirror a reporting error in both 12 months or very distinctive weight-related experiences. We then use an OLS regression to foretell their change in weight (in kilos) between 1999 and 2003.
All fashions embrace PSID 2003 sampling weights to account for the PSID’s attrition and oversampling of low-income Southern households and, thereby, make the findings generalizable to the 2003 U.S.-born inhabitants. For ease of presentation, we current outcomes stratified by intercourse, but we estimate supplemental fashions utilizing a pooled pattern of women and men to straight take a look at whether or not the interplay between meals insecurity and the presence of chil- dren is considerably completely different by intercourse.
Outcomes
Desk 1 presents weighted descriptive statistics for our full analytic pattern and for women and men individually. Key amongst these is that over 60% of the pattern is obese or overweight in each 1999 and 2003. On common, girls usually tend to be over- weight or overweight in each years and girls achieve extra weight between 1999 and 2003 (p < .01). In 1999, 6.eight% of the pattern was meals insecure, whereas solely four.eight% of the pattern was meals insecure in 2003. These estimates are decrease than the nationwide averages for these years, reflecting our restriction to U.S.-born people. As such, our exams depend on the comparability of small subpopulations. There are 174 meals insecure males (101 are fathers) and 293 meals insecure girls (196 are moms). In 2003, the typical pattern member was 39 years previous, which partially accounts for the noticed decline within the proportion dwelling with youngsters between
Desk 1 Pattern means and percentages, weighted and adjusted for sampling design.
Full pattern (N ¼ 7931) 1999 2003
Weight, Cawley-adjusted self-report Physique mass index 28.three 29.2 Weight classification Underweight 1.1% 1.zero% Regular weight (reference) 34.7% 30.1% Obese 33.6% 33.6% Overweight 30.6% 35.three%
Weight change (in kilos), 1999e2003 5.three Family meals insecurity 6.eight% four.eight% Family earnings (in $1000s) e 79,892 Feminine (¼1) e 53.1% Kids Co-reside with youngsters (¼1) 55.zero% 49.9% Quantity of youngsters current 1.zero zero.9 Relationship to co-residential youngsters (amongst these dwelling with youngsters) All borne by her e e Some or all not borne by her e e
Quantity of youngsters ever borne e e Age (vary: 18e55 in 1999) e 39.four Schooling in years (vary: 6e17) e 13.5 Married or cohabiting (¼1) e 73.three% Poor or honest self-rated well being (¼1) e 11.1% Disabled (¼1) e 6.2% Race/ethnicity non-Hispanic White (reference) e 80.1% non-Hispanic African American e 9.9% Hispanic e 6.1% non-Hispanic different racial group e three.9%
Metropolitan residence (¼1) e 76.zero% Notice: Two-tailed exams of a major distinction between women and men are famous as
1999 and 2003. Half the pattern lives with youngsters in 2003 and girls are barely extra doubtless than males to dwell with youngsters (p < .05).
Prior analysis has constantly discovered a linear, detrimental rela- tionship between earnings and weight problems amongst girls, but not males. On condition that this intercourse distinction motivates our research, we first take a look at whether or not we discover related patterns in these knowledge. To take action, we look at coefficients from an OLS regression of standardized BMI (i.e., imply ¼ zero, customary deviation ¼ 1) in 2003 on standardized 2003 family earnings individually for women and men in fashions that embrace PSID sampling weights. We take a look at for vital intercourse variations on this affiliation in a supplemental mannequin that features women and men collectively and an interplay between family earnings and intercourse. For males, the standardized coefficient for family earnings is �zero.01 and never statistically vital (p ¼ .29), whereas for girls it’s �zero.20 and statistically vital (p < .zero01). This intercourse distinction is statistically vital (p < .00zero). We subsequent discover the connection between family earnings and the probability of being obese or overweight in 2003 in the same method, but utilizing a logistic regression mannequin and measuring earnings in its unique metric in ten-thousand greenback models. Home- maintain earnings doesn’t predict whether or not a person will probably be obese or overweight (p ¼ .34), but the chances lady will probably be obese or overweight declines by zero.01 with each ten-thousand greenback enhance in earnings (p < .0001). This intercourse distinction can also be statistically signifi- cant (p < .0001). Thus, we replicate prior analysis findings with these knowledge.
Desk 2 presents the outcomes for our cross-sectional ordinal logistic regression fashions predicting people’ weight classifi- cations in 2003. Mannequin 1 presents the additive mannequin and finds that, for each women and men, neither family meals insecurity nor the presence of youngsters predict being obese. Mannequin 2 supplies the take a look at of our speculation that moms are at the next threat
Ladies (N ¼ 4337) Males (N ¼ 3594) 1999 2003 1999 2003
31.1 32.2 25.3z 25.8z
zero.2% zero.1% 2.0percentz 2.0percentz 17.9% 13.9% 53.7percentz 48.4percentz 34.7% 32.5% 32.three% 34.eight% 47.1% 53.5% 11.9percentz 14.7percentz
6.7 three.7z 7.9% 5.6% 5.5percentz three.9percentz
e 76,460 e 83,783z e e e e
56.2% 51.2% 53.6% 48.4percenty 1.1 1.zero 1.zero zero.9
e 57.5% e e e 42.5% e e e 2.03 e e e 39.three e 39.5 e 13.four e 13.6y e 70.7% e 76.3percentz e 12.four% e 9.7percentz e 7.2% e 5.1percentz
e 78.eight% e 81.8percentz e 11.four% e eight.1percentz e 6.1% e 6.1% e three.7% e four.zero% e 76.three% e 75.7%
follows: y: p < .05, z: p < .01.
Desk 2 Coefficients from cross-sectional ordinal logistic regression fashions predicting a heavier weight classification in 2003 (N ¼ 7,931).
Ladies Males
Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2 Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2
Youngster current �zero.zero34 (zero.09) �zero.085 (zero.09) �zero.127 (zero.08) �zero.122 (zero.09) Family meals insecurity zero.085 (zero.21) �zero.487 (zero.31) �zero.zero62 (zero.22) zero.zero27 (zero.34) Youngster current * Family meals insecurity e 1.106 (zero.40) ** e �zero.150 (zero.42) z Age zero.013 (zero.01) ** zero.zero12 (zero.01) ** zero.003 (zero.01) zero.003 (zero.01) Married or cohabiting �zero.298 (zero.01) ** �zero.303 (zero.10) ** zero.363 (zero.12) ** z zero.363 (zero.12) ** z Schooling �zero.132 (zero.02) *** �zero.130 (zero.02) *** �zero.zero62 (zero.02) *** z �zero.zero62 (zero.02) *** y Poor or honest well being zero.064 (zero.17) zero.zero76 (zero.16) zero.586 (zero.16) *** y zero.589 (zero.16) *** y Disabled zero.309 (zero.18) zero.331 (zero.18) �zero.zero57 (zero.23) �zero.zero62 (zero.23) Race/ethnicity (reference: non-Hispanic White) African American 1.295 (zero.12) *** 1.287 (zero.12) *** �zero.440 (zero.12) *** z �zero.441 (zero.12) *** z Hispanic 1.537 (zero.24) *** 1.503 (zero.24) *** �zero.350 (zero.18) z �zero.345 (zero.18) z Different race �zero.zero42 (zero.20) �zero.zero47 (zero.20) �zero.248 (zero.19) �zero.249 (zero.19) Metropolitan space �zero.158 (zero.09) �zero.162 (zero.09) �zero.025 (zero.09) z �zero.025 (zero.09)
Commonplace errors in parentheses * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .zero01. Notice: The ordered weight classifications are (1) Regular or Underweight, (2) Obese, and (three) Overweight. Fashions are weighted and adjusted for sampling design. Two-tailed exams of a major distinction between women and men are famous as follows: y: p < .05, z: p < .01.
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e1764 1759
for obese and weight problems when challenged with meals insecurity relative to child-free girls and all males. The outcomes help our speculation. The coefficient for the interplay between family meals insecurity and youngster co-residence amongst girls is massive in magnitude (e.g., comparable in dimension to the coefficients for being African American or Hispanic) and extremely vital (p < .01). Actually, the probability lady is in a heavier weight classifica- tion is 202% (¼[e1.106 � 1]*100%) larger if she is a meals insecure mom relative to child-free meals safe lady. Furthermore, by altering the reference class, we will see that the probability of being in a heavier weight classification is 177% (¼[e1.02 � 1]*100%) larger for meals insecure moms versus meals insecure child-free girls (p < .05). Amongst males, the interplay between house- maintain meals insecurity and the presence of youngsters will not be statistically vital. This intercourse distinction is statistically vital (p < .01).
We additionally discover whether or not we discover related outcomes utilizing the quantity of youngsters current within the dwelling as an alternative of a easy cate- gorical indicator for any youngsters. Though the outcomes are within the anticipated course, the interplay will not be statistically vital for girls (p ¼ .35) or males (p ¼ .62). We additionally discover whether or not we
Desk three Coefficients from cross-sectional ordered logistic regression fashions predicting a heavier
Ladies
Mannequin 1
Panel A. Separate Fashions by Relationship Standing Married or Cohabiting in 2003 (N ¼ 5,863) Youngster current �zero.071 (zero.10) Family meals insecurity zero.620 (zero.30) Youngster current * HH meals insecuritya e Single in 2003 (N ¼ 2,068) Youngster current zero.zero80 (zero.17) Family meals insecurity �zero.271 (zero.28) Youngster current * HH meals insecuritya e Panel B. Ladies Dwelling with Kids in 2003 (N [ 2,592) Co-resides with youngsters not borne by her zero.263 (zero.16) Family meals insecurity zero.749 (zero.27) Co-resides with youngsters not borne by her * HH meals insecuritya e Quantity of youngsters current zero.066 (zero.11) Panel C. Ladies Who Have Ever Had a Beginning by 2003 (N [ three,844) Quantity of youngsters ever born zero.104 (zero.04) Family meals insecurity zero.332 (zero.22) Quantity of youngsters ever born * HH meals insecuritya e
Commonplace errors in parentheses * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .zero01. Notice: The ordered weight classifications are (1) Regular or Underweight, (2) Obese exams of a major distinction between women and men are famous as follows: y: p < .zero
a “HH” is an abbreviation for “Family”.
discover related outcomes if we substitute the quantity of years of house- maintain meals insecurity between 1999 and 2003 for the specific indicator of family meals insecurity in 2003. Just like our preliminary outcomes, we discover that the danger of being obese or overweight will increase because the years of family meals insecurity will increase amongst moms (b ¼ zero.338, p < .05), but not non-mothers. (Outcomes for these two exams obtainable upon request.) Thus, with these preliminary exams, we discover help for our first speculation: family meals insecurity is related to obese and weight problems amongst moms, but not amongst child-free girls or all males.
Desk three exams this fundamental discovering throughout numerous specs to higher verify the components that undergird this differential threat for moms. Panel A supplies the take a look at for Speculation 2 and examines whether or not the dangers of meals insecurity are larger amongst single moms relative to married or cohabiting moms. We stratify our pattern not solely by intercourse, but additionally by whether or not the individual lives with a associate. Amongst married and cohabiting people, we don’t discover that meals insecure moms usually tend to be obese or overweight than meals insecure, child-free girls or meals safe girls. We do see this amongst single meals insecure moms. Subsequently, as
weight classification in 2003.
Males
Mannequin 2 Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2
�zero.zero73 (zero.10) �zero.zero50 (zero.09) �zero.064 (zero.09) zero.578 (zero.48) �zero.324 (zero.26) y �zero.738 (zero.48) y zero.064 (zero.60) e zero.550 (zero.55)
�zero.zero74 (zero.18) �zero.842 (zero.24) *** z �zero.795 (zero.25) ** z �zero.890 (zero.37) * zero.519 (zero.40) y zero.600 (zero.47) y 1.471 (zero.54) ** e �zero.333 (zero.86)
zero.207 (zero.16) e e ** zero.588 (zero.28) * e e
2.357 (1.07) * e e zero.068 (zero.11) e e
* zero.109 (zero.04) * e e zero.576 (zero.54) e e
�zero.zero95 (zero.18) e e
, and (three) Overweight. Fashions are weighted and adjusted for sampling design. Two-tailed 5, z: p < .01. Fashions embrace all management variables measured in 2003.
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e17641760
predicted, the dangers of meals insecurity are larger amongst single moms. We don’t discover related and statistically vital dangers for meals insecure, single fathers and the distinction between single fathers and single moms will not be statistically vital. But our restricted pattern sizes for meals insecure single fathers (n ¼ 18) and meals insecure single moms (n ¼ 104) restrict the reliability of these intercourse comparisons.
Panels B and C in Desk three discover whether or not the larger threat of weight problems amongst meals insecure moms is said to pregnancy- particular metabolic modifications that predispose organic moms to be heavier. Panel B focuses on girls dwelling with youngsters in 2003; all different people are omitted from these fashions. The fashions take a look at whether or not moms who didn’t give start to the kids they dwell with are much less more likely to be obese relative to these moms who did, whereas controlling for the quantity of youngsters current. In Mannequin 1, we affirm that every one meals insecure moms usually tend to be obese or overweight, but their organic relationship to these youngsters will not be, on common, predictive of being obese or overweight. In Mannequin 2, we take a look at whether or not the dangers of meals insecurity for being obese or overweight are larger for these dwelling with solely organic youngsters. If both pregnancy-specific metabolic modifications or evolutionary-based preferences for organic youngsters had been driving our outcomes, then we’d anticipate the coefficient for the interplay between family meals insecurity and dwelling with non-biological youngsters to be statistically vital and detrimental. Though the interplay is statistically vital, it has the other signal. The dangers of meals insecurity for being in a heavier weight class are literally larger if the mom will not be biologically associated to all of the kids current.
To additional take a look at whether or not pregnancy-related metabolic modifications clarify the associations noticed in Desk 2, Panel C in Desk three examines these patterns amongst girls who’ve ever given start, regardless of whether or not these youngsters at the moment dwell with them or not and controlling for the moms’ social and demographic
Desk four Coefficients from cross-sectional ordered logistic regression fashions predicting a heavier w pathways.
Mannequin three
Ladies Youngster current �zero.zero87 (zero.09) Family meals insecurity �zero.493 (zero.30) Youngster current * HH meals insecuritya 1.119 (zero.40) ** Bodily Exercise Frequency of gentle exercise �zero.003 (zero.00) Frequency of heavy exercise �zero.zero12 (zero.01) **
Substance use Alcohol consumption e Smoking e
Means-Examined Diet Program Participation Meals stamps e WIC e
Males Youngster current �zero.135 (zero.09) Family meals insecurity zero.zero28 (zero.35) Youngster current * HH meals insecuritya �zero.169 (zero.42) z Bodily Exercise Frequency of gentle exercise �zero.zero01 (zero.00) Frequency of heavy exercise �zero.zero09 (zero.00) *
Substance use Alcohol consumption e Smoking e
Means-Examined Diet Program Participation Meals stamps e WIC e
Commonplace errors in parentheses * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .zero01. Notice: The ordered weight classifications are (1) Regular or Underweight, (2) Obese exams of a major distinction between women and men are famous as follows: y: p < .zero
a “HH” is an abbreviation for “Family”.
traits. Mannequin 1 demonstrates that the probability a mom is obese or overweight will increase with parity. Apparently, present family meals insecurity amongst all girls who’ve ever given start will not be predictive of obese. Mannequin 2 reveals, nevertheless, that the expertise of family meals insecurity doesn’t work together with a girl’s parity to generate further dangers for being obese or overweight. Subsequently, based mostly on the leads to Panels B and C of Desk three, we conclude that metabolic modifications related to being pregnant don’t clarify why meals insecure moms are at larger threat of being obese or overweight.
Though the proof is in step with our theoretical rationalization that meals insecure moms undertake methods that try to guard their youngsters, but that create dangers for being obese or overweight, we should not have direct measures of these behaviors to check this. As a substitute, we take a look at different mediating pathways and see if, with the inclusion of different indicators, the magnitude or statistical significance of our key discovering modifications. Desk four presents the outcomes from a sequence of fashions that take a look at whether or not the danger of being over- weight or overweight for meals insecure moms differs with the inclu- sion of bodily exercise (Mannequin three), smoking and alcohol consumption (Mannequin four), and meals stamps and WIC participation (Mannequin 5). Mannequin 6 contains all six hypothesized mediating path- methods. Throughout all fashions, the interplay of meals insecurity and the presence of youngsters is statistically vital and basically the identical magnitude as reported in Desk 2. The interplay for males isn’t statistically vital.
We subsequent estimate our longitudinal fashions. As a result of of the choice course of into childbirth, adoption and forming a blended household with non-biological youngsters, we not solely estimate our longitudinal fashions for the total pattern, but additionally on a sub-sample of people already dwelling with youngsters in 1999. If choice into youngster co-residence had been a key issue, then we must always discover bigger estimates for the interplay between family meals insecurity and modifications within the quantity of youngsters within the full pattern.
eight classification in 2003 with the inclusion of indicators for different mediating
Mannequin four Mannequin 5 Mannequin 6
�zero.130 (zero.09) �zero.106 (zero.09) �zero.152 (zero.09) �zero.454 (zero.31) �zero.502 (zero.30) �zero.476 (zero.31) 1.117 (zero.41) ** 1.zero12 (zero.40) * 1.zero41 (zero.41) *
e e �zero.003 (zero.00) e e �zero.zero12 (zero.01) **
�zero.301 (zero.06) *** e �zero.289 (zero.06) *** �zero.447 (zero.11) *** e �zero.455 (zero.11) ***
e zero.314 (zero.21) zero.317 (zero.21) e zero.469 (zero.24) zero.443 (zero.25)
�zero.15 (zero.09) �zero.117 (zero.09) �zero.16 (zero.09) zero.119 (zero.34) zero.zero29 (zero.34) zero.119 (zero.35)
�zero.159 (zero.41) z �zero.130 (zero.42) z �zero.174 (zero.41) z
e e �zero.zero01 (zero.00) e e �zero.zero10 (zero.00) *
�zero.072 (zero.05) z e �zero.zero70 (zero.05) z �zero.744 (zero.10) *** z e �zero.757 (zero.11) *** z
e �zero.215 (zero.24) z �zero.085 (zero.23) z e zero.061 (zero.23) y zero.zero76 (zero.23) y
, and (three) Overweight. Fashions are weighted and adjusted for sampling design. Two-tailed 5, z: p < .01. Fashions embrace all management variables measured in 2003.
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e1764 1761
You will need to be aware that these fashions are susceptible to points of energy. At first, the interactions in these longitudinal fashions create extra combos of uncommon occasions. As such, we think about p-values of lower than .10 as statistically vital. Additionally, it’s unknown whether or not a four-year window is a enough timeframe to look at shifts in weight as a operate of the mixture of meals insecurity and childcare amongst girls. Lastly, there’s the potential for differential ceiling results. In 1999, 30% of girls within the pattern are already overweight, whereas solely 12% of males are overweight in 1999. Equally meals insecure girls are already heavier in 1999 than meals safe girls.
Desk 5 shows the outcomes for OLS regression fashions of weight change between 1999 and 2003 after omitting those that achieve or lose 75 kilos or furthermore this four-year interval. In Mannequin 1, we see that will increase within the quantity of youngsters should not, on common, predictive of weight achieve for both girls or males within the full pattern. Related patterns are noticed for girls within the sub- pattern restricted to these dwelling with youngsters in 1999. But males dwelling with youngsters in 1999 are predicted to drop a few pounds because the quantity of youngsters will increase. Years of meals insecurity is related to weight reduction, but this affiliation is barely statistically signifi- cant amongst girls within the full pattern and males dwelling with chil- dren in 1999.
Mannequin 2 contains the interplay between modifications within the quantity of youngsters current and the depend of years of meals insecu- rity. We discover a vital optimistic affiliation for each ladies and men within the full pattern and a major optimistic affiliation for girls within the sub-sample of folks dwelling with youngsters in 1999. You will need to be aware that the magnitude of the interplay is bigger for girls already dwelling with youngsters in 1999 than for all girls. Thus, choice into organic or social motherhood will not be the important thing issue. For males, nevertheless, the interplay is bigger within the full pattern and, thus, choice may underlie these outcomes.
Given the sudden statistically vital interplay for males within the full pattern, we graph the anticipated possibilities from this mannequin in Fig. 1. The predicted possibilities are calculated by letting the quantity of youngsters, years of family meals insecurity, and their interplay to freely fluctuate, but we set all different variables to their means or modal classes. For ease of presentation, Panel A exhibits the patterns when people dwell with fewer youngsters in 2003, Panel B exhibits the patterns when the quantity of youngsters is unchanged, and Panel C exhibits the patterns when people dwell with extra youngsters in 2003. In every panel, the y-axis is the quantity of kilos gained or misplaced between 1999 and 2003 and the x-axis is the years of meals insecurity. The darkish bars are for males and the lighter bars are for girls.
Panels A and B reveal related patterns for each women and men. Whether or not the quantity of co-residential youngsters declines (Panel A) or stays the identical (Panel B), women and men achieve probably the most weight (i.e., 5 kilos for males and seven kilos for girls) if they’re
Desk 5 Coefficients from OLS regression fashions predicting weight change (in kilos; 2003e199 years of meals insecurity (1999, 2001, 2003).
Full Pattern (N ¼ 7,808)a
Ladies Males
Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2 Mannequin 1 Mode
Change in depend of youngsters zero.184 (zero.47) �zero.274 (zero.49) �zero.397 (zero.38) �zero.61 Years of meals insecurity �1.690 (zero.85) * �1.298 (zero.87) �1.zero62 (zero.80) �zero.92 Change in youngster depend *
Years of meals insec. e 1.911 (zero.95) * e 1.15
Commonplace errors in parentheses þ p <.10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .zero01. Notice: Fashions are weighted and adjusted for sampling design. Two-tailed exams of a signifi z: p < .01. Fashions embrace all management variables measured in 2003.
a People who misplaced or gained 75 or extra kilos between 1999 and 2003 are omit
by no means meals insecure. The quantity of weight they achieve, nevertheless, declines because the years of meals insecurity will increase. Actually, in Panel A, women and men who dwell with fewer youngsters in 2003 and expe- rience three years of meals insecurity truly drop a few pounds (i.e., four kilos for males and three kilos for girls). Panel C, which exhibits the patterns for people who dwell with extra youngsters in 2003, is revealing. For males dwelling with extra youngsters in 2003, their weight achieve over this era (roughly four kilos) is insensitive to will increase within the quantity of years of meals insecurity. Amongst girls who dwell with extra youngsters in 2003, nevertheless, the quantity of weight they achieve will increase as their years of meals insecurity will increase. Those that are by no means meals insecure achieve 6 kilos and those that are meals insecure for three years achieve 10 kilos. Though that is solely a four-pound distinction, we see that as childcare obligations enhance along with larger publicity to family meals insecurity, girls achieve extra weight. For males, this vital interplay interprets into them being much less more likely to drop a few pounds as they achieve youngsters and enhance their years of family meals insecurity. Subsequently, the longitudinal outcomes buttress our cross-sectional findings.
Dialogue
This manuscript explores whether or not the intercourse variations in obese and weight problems associated to meals insecurity, and earnings extra broadly, could be higher characterised as variations between moms and non-mothers. In help of Speculation 1, we discover that meals insecure moms usually tend to be obese and overweight than their meals insecure, but child-free feminine counter- elements. In distinction, meals insecure fathers should not at larger threat of being obese or overweight. These dangers of motherhood don’t seem like the consequence of metabolic modifications related to being pregnant per se, nor do they diminish with the inclusion of self- reported bodily exercise, smoking, consuming, meals stamps receipt, and WIC participation. Moreover, the longitudinal findings counsel that ladies are in danger of gaining weight as they achieve childcare obligations and extra years of family meals insecurity.
The mixed dangers of childcare and family meals insecurity are notably problematic for single moms, as we predicted in Speculation 2. Single moms should not solely extra in danger of experi- encing meals insecurity than their married or cohabiting counter- elements, but the results of family meals insecurity for his or her weight are larger. On the individual-level, this doubtless displays the challenges of being each the only real supplier and caretaker inside a family. But there is a vital cultural dimension as effectively. Most single mum or dad households are headed by girls as a result of of conventional, gendered views of childcare. Collectively, these particular person and cultural components place single moms at larger threat of poverty, meals insecurity, and weight problems.
9) based mostly on the change within the quantity of youngsters current (2003e1999) and depend of
Dwelling with Kids in 1999 (N ¼ four,904)a
Ladies Males
l 2 Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2 Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2
9 (zero.41) �zero.145 (zero.57) �zero.873 (zero.61) �zero.887 (zero.52) þ �1.zero12 (zero.55) þ 2 (zero.80) �1.645 (1.04) �zero.789 (1.05) �1.649 (zero.92) þ �1.495 (zero.95) ! three (zero.57) * e 2.549 (zero.95) ** e zero.520 (zero.63) !
cant distinction between women and men are famous as follows: !: p <.10, y: p < .05,
ted from these Assessment.
B People who Reside with the Similar Quantity of Kids in 2003 and 1999
A People who Reside with Fewer Kids in 2003
-1 zero
-5 zero
5 10
15 W
ei gh
t g ai
ne d
or lo
st , 2
00 three
– 1 99
9, in
p ou
nd s
zero years 1 12 months 2 years three years Years of Family Meals Insecurity, 1999, 2001, 2003
Males Ladies
-1 zero
-5 zero
5 10
15 W
ei gh
t g ai
ne d
or lo
st , 2
00 three
– 1 99
9, in
p ou
nd s
zero years 1 12 months 2 years three years Years of Family Meals Insecurity, 1999, 2001, 2003
Males Ladies
People who Reside with Extra Kids in 2003
-1 zero
-5 zero
5 10
15 W
ei gh
t g ai
ne d
or lo
st , 2
00 three
– 1 99
9, in
p ou
nd s
zero years 1 12 months 2 years three years Years of Family Meals Insecurity, 1999, 2001, 2003
Males Ladies
C
Fig. 1. Predicted change in weight 1999 and 2003 relying on modifications within the quantity of co-residential youngsters and years of meals insecurity. Panel A. People who dwell with fewer youngsters in 2003. Panel B. People who dwell with the identical quantity of youngsters in 2003 and 1999. Panel C. People who dwell with extra youngsters in 2003.
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e17641762
This research will not be with out limitations. As a result of of the PSID’s design, our findings are consultant of US-born people and can’t converse to the dangers for immigrant moms, an essential and rising section of the US inhabitants. As a result of immigrants have larger charges of meals insecurity (Borjas, 2004), our pattern has a decrease charges of meals insecurity than is present in official stories. This, in flip, limits our energy for some analyses on condition that we work together family meals insecurity (5% of the pattern), intercourse (50% is feminine), and co-residence with youngsters (50% of the pattern) in all fashions. In gentle of these energy limitations it’s considerably stunning that we will detect statistically vital variations for single moms, girls dwelling with some non-biological youngsters, and for all moms in our longitudinal analyses. Our pattern can also be restricted to people who head their very own family (both alone or with a associate) over these 4 years. Our findings might not be relevant to those that dwell in subfamilies or with their mother and father, although we discover substantively related outcomes after we chill out this requirement. We want the outcomes introduced right here that use this pattern restriction as a result of the choice to maneuver in with another person is probably going endogenous to the processes we’re involved in (i.e., the administration of poverty and meals insecurity) and thus deserves larger consideration and direct investigation. A key limitation is that we solely have oblique proof that moms undertake methods to guard their youngsters, but place themselves at larger threat of weight problems. Lastly, we can’t declare to have uncovered a causal relationship, even within the longitudinal fashions, as a result of we have now observational knowledge. For a stronger take a look at, we additionally ran mounted results fashions to look at modifications over time. The interplay between family meals insecurity and the presence of youngsters was not statistically vital for males or girls in these fashions (see Appendix Desk 1). Thus, unobserved components could also be contributing to the patterns we observe. Nevertheless, mounted results fashions place even larger calls for on energy and this may increasingly partially clarify the absence of a major impact. We encourage students to conduct further analysis and gather knowledge with bigger samples and direct measures of particular person’s dietary conduct to higher adjudicate the connection between family meals insecurity, motherhood, and weight.
These caveats apart, our analysis makes a major contribu- tion by demonstrating that that the documented intercourse distinction within the relationship between meals insecurity and weight is healthier characterised as a distinction between moms and non-mothers. The outcomes are in step with our arguments, derived from prior analysis on meals insecurity, that moms undertake quite a few, but unhealthy methods to guard their youngsters when the household faces threats to their meals provide. These findings, thus, present a brand new lens by which to contemplate our generally held biases towards obese girls. Weight problems is very stigmatized (Dejong, 1980; Puhl & Brownell, 2003) and folks regularly characterize those that are obese as lazy and silly (Crandall & Schiffhauer, 1998). To the extent that poor, meals insecure moms are at larger threat of weight problems, the prior literature means that it’s actually not attributable to sloth or absent-mindedness. As a substitute, we suspect that their lively administration and safety of their youngsters creates dangers for weight problems and weight achieve. Past drawing our consideration to the commonly hidden work of poor moms, these outcomes show that our socially constructed roles and obligations can generate dangers for particular person well being and well-being.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this analysis was supplied by NICHD grant R01- HD050144 (PI: G.D. Sandefur). We thank Michelle Frisco and Jason Houle, the Robert Wooden Johnson Basis Well being & Society Students Program Working Group on Gender and Well being at Columbia College, and nameless reviewers for his or her worthwhile feedback.
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e1764 1763
Appendix
Desk 1 Coefficients from OLS mounted results regression fashions predicting weight, 1999e2003
Ladies Males
Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2 Mannequin 1 Mannequin 2
Quantity of youngsters current
�zero.150 (zero.32) �zero.177 (zero.33) zero.173 (zero.24) zero.167 (zero.24)
Family meals insecurity
�zero.619 (zero.81) �zero.966 (1.29) �1.284 (zero.76) �1.365 (1.04)
Quantity of youngsters * Family meals insecurity
e zero.213 (zero.58) e zero.zero54 (zero.47)
Commonplace errors in parentheses. Notice: This mannequin has three explanatory variables, 7,808 people (N), and three time factors (T). The complete quantity of observations equals N * T ¼ 23,424, whereas the levels of freedom misplaced equals NþK�1 ¼ 7,810.
References
Adams, E. J., Grummer-Strawn, L., & Chavez, G. (2003). Meals insecurity is related to elevated threat of weight problems in California girls. Journal of Diet, 133, 1070e1074.
Allon, N. (1982). The stigma of obese in on a regular basis life. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Psychological facets of weight problems: A handbook (pp. 130e174). New York: Van Nostrand.
Badun, C., Evers, S., & Hooper, M. (1995). Meals safety and dietary issues of mother and father in an economically deprived group. Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Affiliation, 56(2), 75e80.
Becketti, S., Gould, W., Lillard, L., & Welch, F. (1988). The PSID after fourteen years: an analysis. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(four), 472e492.
Berkey, C. S., Rockett, H. R., Gillman, M. W., Area, A. E., & Colditz, G. A. (2003). Longitu- dinal research of skipping breakfast and weight change in adolescents. Worldwide Journal of Weight problems and Associated Metabolic Issues, 27(10), 1258e1266.
Bickel, G., Nord, M., Worth, C., Hamilton, W., & Cook dinner, J. (2000). Information to measuring family meals safety. Revised 2000. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Division of Agriculture, Agriculture, Meals and Diet Service.
Borjas, G. (2004). Meals insecurity and public help. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7e8), 1421e1443.
Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and alter within the American household. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cawley, J. (2004). The influence of weight problems on wages. Journal of Human Sources, 39(2), 451e474.
Cawley, J., & Burkhauser, R. V. (2006). Past BMI: The worth of extra correct measures of fatness and weight problems in social science analysis. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper 12291.
Coltrane, S. (2000). Analysis on family labor: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine household work. Journal of Marriage and Household, 62(four), 1208e1233.
Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2003). The social building of the divorce ‘drawback’: morality, youngster victims, and the politics of gender. Household Relations, 52(four), 363e372.
Crandall, C., & Schiffhauer, Ok. (1998). Anti-fat prejudice: beliefs, values, and Amer- ican tradition. Weight problems Analysis, 6, 458e460.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1980). Discriminative parental solicitude: a organic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Household, 42(2), 277e288.
Dejong, W. (1980). The stigma of weight problems: the results of naïve assumptions regarding the causes of bodily deviance. Journal of Well being and Social Conduct, 21, 75e87.
DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the household. Chicago: College of Chicago Press. Dinour, L. M., Bergen, D., & Yeh, M.-C. (2007). The meals insecurity-obesity paradox:
a overview of the literature and the function meals stamps could play. Journal of the American Dietetic Affiliation, 107(11), 1952e1961.
Dixon, L. B., Winkleby, M. A., & Radimer, Ok. L. (2001). Dietary intakes and serum vitamins differ between adults from food-insufficient and food-sufficient households: Third Nationwide Well being and Diet Examination Survey, 1988e1994. Journal of Diet, 131(four), 1232e1246.
Drewnowski, A., & Specter, S. E. (2004). Poverty and weight problems: the function of power density and power prices. American Journal of Scientific Diet, 79(1), 6e16.
Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998). An Assessment of pattern attrition in panel knowledge: the Michigan panel research of earnings dynamics. Journal of Human Sources, 33(2), 251e299.
French, S. A., Story, M., & Jeffery, R. W. (2001). Environmental influences on consuming and bodily exercise. Annual Overview of Public Well being, 22, 309e335.
Furstenberg, F. F., & Cherlin, A. J. (1994). Divided households: What occurs to youngsters when mother and father half. Cambridge, MA: Harvard College Press.
Gibson, D. (2003). Meals Stamp Program participation is positively associated to weight problems in low earnings girls. Journal of Diet, 133, 2225e2231.
Glass, T. A., & McAtee, M. J. (2006). Behavioral science on the crossroads in public well being: extending horizons, envisioning the long run. Social Science & Drugs, 62(7), 1650e1671.
Gundersen, C., Garasky, S., & Lohman, B. J. (2009). Meals insecurity will not be related to childhood weight problems as assessed utilizing a number of measures of weight problems. Journal of Diet, 139(6), 1173e1178.
Gundersen, C., & Kreider, B. (2009). Bounding the consequences of meals insecurity on youngsters’s well being outcomes. Journal of Well being Economics, 28(5), 971e983.
Hays, S. (1998). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale College Press.
Hill, M. S. (1992). The panel research of earnings dynamics: A person’s information. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Huddleston-Casas, C., Charnigo, R., & Simmons, L. A. (2009). Meals insecurity and maternal despair in rural, low-income households: a longitudinal investigation. Public Well being Diet, 12, 1133e1140.
Institute of Drugs. (2011). Starvation and weight problems: Understanding a meals insecurity paradigm: Workshop abstract. Washington, D.C.: The Nationwide Academies Press.
Kempson, Ok. M., Keenan, D. P., Sadani, P. S., Ridlen, S., & Rosato, N. S. (2002). Meals administration practices utilized by folks with restricted assets to take care of meals sufficiency as reported by diet educators. Journal of the American Dietetic Affiliation, 102(12), 1795e1799.
Kirkpatrick, S. I., & Tarasuk, V. (2008). Meals insecurity is related to nutrient inadequacies amongst Canadian adults and adolescents. Journal of Diet, 138(three), 604e612.
Ledikwe, J. H., Blanck, H. M., Khan, L. Ok., Serdula, M. Ok., Seymour, J. D., Tohill, B. C., et al. (2006). Dietary power density is related to power consumption and weight standing in US adults. American Journal of Scientific Diet, 83(6), 1362e1368.
Lyons, A.-A., Park, J., & Nelson, C. H. (2008). Meals insecurity and weight problems: a comparability of self-reported and measured top and weight. American Journal of Public Well being, 98(four), 751e757.
Ma, Y., Bertone, E. R., Stanek, E. J., III, Reed, G. W., Hebert, J. R., Cohen, N. L., et al. (2003). Affiliation between consuming patterns and weight problems in a free-living US grownup inhabitants. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158(1), 85e92.
Marsiglio, W., Amato, P., Day, R. D., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Scholarship on fatherhood within the 1990s and past. Journal of Marriage and Household, 62(four), 1173e1191.
Martin, Ok. S., & Ferris, A. M. (2007). Meals insecurity and gender are threat components for weight problems. Journal of Diet Schooling and Conduct, 39(1), 31e36.
McIntyre, L., Connor, S. Ok., & Warren, J. (2000). Youngster starvation in Canada: outcomes of the 1994 nationwide longitudinal survey of youngsters and youth. Canadian Medical Affiliation Journal, 163(eight), 961e965.
McIntyre, L., Glanville, N. T., Raine, Ok. D., Dayle, J. B., Anderson, B., & Battaglia, N. (2003). Do low-income lone moms compromise their diet to feed their youngsters? Canadian Medical Affiliation Journal, 168(6), 686e691.
McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic standing and weight problems. Epidemiological Critiques, (Superior Entry).
Mitchell, B. D., Rainwater, D. L., Hsueh, W.-C., Kennedy, A. J., Stern, M. P., & MacCluer, J. W. (2003). Familial aggregation of nutrient consumption and bodily exercise: outcomes from the San Antonio household coronary heart research. Annals of Epidemi- ology, 13(2), 128e135.
Mokdad, A. H., Ford, E. S., Bowman, B. A., Dietz, W. H., Vinicor, F., Bales, V. S., et al. (2003). Prevalence of weight problems, diabetes, and obesity-related well being threat components, 2001. JAMA, 289, 76e79.
Nord, M., Andrews, M., & Carlson, S. (2004). Family meals safety in the USA, 2003. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Division of Agriculture, Financial Analysis Service.
Nord, M., Coleman-Jensen, A., Andrews, M., & Carlson, S. (2010). Family meals safety in the USA, 2009. Washington, D.C.: US Division of Agri- tradition, Financial Analysis Service.
Olson, C. M. (1999). Diet and well being outcomes related to meals insecurity and starvation. Journal of Diet, 129, 521e524.
Poston, W. S., 2nd, & Foreyt, J. P. (1999). Weight problems is an environmental problem. Atherosclerosis, 146(2), 201e209.
Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, Ok. D. (2003). Psychosocial origins of weight problems stigma: towards altering a robust and pervasive bias. Weight problems Critiques, four, 213e227.
Radimer, Ok. L. (1990). Understanding starvation and growing indicators to evaluate it. Ithaca, NY: Cornell College.
Rose, D., Gundersen, C., & Oliveira, V. (1998). Socio-economic determinants of meals insecurity in the USA: Proof from the SIPP and CSFII datasets. Tech- nical Bulletin #1869. Washington, DC: U.S. Division of Agriculture, Financial Analysis Service.
Rothman, S. M. (1978). Girl’s correct place: A historical past of altering concepts and practices, 1870 to the current. New York: Primary.
Royston, P. (2005a). A number of imputation of lacking values: replace. Stata Journal, 5(2), 1e14.
Royston, P. (2005b). A number of imputation of lacking values: replace of ice. Stata Journal, 5(four), 527e536.
Rubin, D. (1987). A number of imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Changing into moms and dads: parenthood,
gender, and the division of labor. Gender and Society, 11(6), 747e772. Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, S., & Lahelma, E. (2001). Meals insecurity is related to
previous and current financial drawback and physique mass index. Journal of Diet, 141, 2880e2884.
Schoeller, D. A. (1990). How correct is self-reported dietary power consumption? Diet Critiques, 48(10), 373e379.
M.A. Martin, A.M. Lippert / Social Science & Drugs 74 (2012) 1754e17641764
Slattery, M. L., McDonald, A., Bild, D. E., Caan, B. J., Hilner, J. E., Jacobs, D. R., jr., et al. (1992). Associations of physique fats and its distribution with dietary consumption, bodily exercise, alcohol, and smoking in blacks and whites. American Journal of Scientific Diet, 55, 943e949.
Sobal, J., & Stunkard, A. J. (1989). Socioeconomic standing and weight problems: a overview of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 260e275.
Sokoloff, N. J. (1980). Between cash and love: The dialectics of dwelling and market work. New York: Praeger.
South, S. J., & Spitze, G. (1994). House responsibilities in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Overview, 59(three), 327e347.
Stevens, C. A. (2010). Exploring meals insecurity amongst younger moms (15e24 years). Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 15(2), 163e171.
Tarasuk, V., & Beaton, G. H. (1999). Ladies’s dietary intakes within the context of family meals insecurity. Journal of Diet, 129, 672e679.
Tarasuk, V., McIntyre, L., & Li, J. (2007). Low-income girls’s dietary intakes are delicate to the depletion of family assets in a single month. Journal of Diet, 137, 1980e1987.
Townsend, M. S., Peerson, J., Love, B., Achterberg, C., & Murphy, S. P. (2001). Meals insecurity is positively associated to obese in girls. Journal of Diet, 131(6), 1738e1745.
Wiig, Ok., & Smith, C. (2008). The artwork of grocery buying on a meals stamp price range: components influencing the meals selections of low-income girls as they attempt to make ends meet. Public Well being Diet, 12, 1726e1734.
Wilde, P. E., & Peterman, J. N. (2006). Particular person weight change is related to family meals safety standing. Journal of Diet, 136, 1395e1400.
Wunderlich, G. S., & Norwood, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Meals insecurity and starvation in the USA: An Assessment of the measure. Washington, DC: Nationwide Acade- mies Press.
Feeding her youngsters, but risking her well being: The intersection of gender, family meals insecurity and weight problems
Meals insecurity and weight
Gender, childcare, and meals insecurity administration
The function of marriage and cohabitation
Various explanations
Knowledge and strategies
Knowledge
Measures
Physique weight
Family meals insecurity
Intercourse
Kids
Associate co-residence
Various mediating variables
Management variables
Assessment
Outcomes
Dialogue
Acknowledgments
Appendix
References
