ASK 1: Sexism (7 factors complete)
Please full Glick & Fiske’s (1996) “Ambivalent Sexism Stock” (ASI) at: http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/
This should take no more than 10 minutes so you won’t have to invest too much time. After you full the ASI, you might be given TWO scores, one to your degree of hostile sexism and one to your degree of benevolent sexism. Additionally, you will give you the option to examine your scores to others who took the survey on-line in addition to some responses damaged down by nation.
For this activity, you might be contemplating the scores themselves and likewise the ideas.
1. Analyze and focus on your hostile and benevolent sexism SCORES (2.5pts).
(Be aware: If you are uncomfortable offering your precise scores within the public discussion board, please do not. Nonetheless, you should ship me the scores by way of IM or e-mail so I do know you did full the task and get credit score). For the publish, you want to focus on and analyze your scores by comparability – examine your scores to the common of not less than two different classes; to males/females; different nations — you choose who or what you discover fascinating to examine to however more importantly, present the reason why you selected these classes and what you anticipated to discover in your comparability (with causes based mostly in psychological ideas). Different features to contemplate: What did you consider the gadgets within the survey? Clarify what you take into consideration the scores .. correct? What else crossed your thoughts?
2. Analyze and focus on the CONCEPTS of hostile and benevolent sexism (four.5pts).
Some questions I got here up with for you to contemplate (however keep in mind, definitely add more of your personal ideas right here): Do you assume “ambivalent” sexism is sensible? How do you assume the 2 varieties are associated? What’s the relevance and implications of those? How would possibly we cut back each? I am positive there are various different concepts that come to your thoughts so please discover them on this commentary.
As a part of this activity, discover one article from a Psychology Journal (ideally one which has the phrases “Social” together with “Psychology” within the title of the journal) that explored the ASI (and please, don’t use the unique Glick and Fiske work or different work they did following up on the dimensions for this requirement — after all you can embrace their work for different components of the dialogue if you need). Present a quick paragraph summarizing the article (once more, that entails writing in regards to the speculation, briefly what they did and what they discovered — all in your personal phrases) and ensure to embrace the correct APA quotation for the supply (this abstract of the article might be value 1.5 out of the four.5 factors).
Hope you get pleasure from. Remember the fact that not all of you will agree with one another and that’s simply FINE; simply ensure that together with opinion, you contemplate the social psychological rules at play and unnecessary to say, are respectful in your responses to one another!
TASK 2: Racism (5 factors)
For this activity, please watch the next excerpt offered by Frontline on Youtube taken from Jane Elliott’s traditional experiment titled “A Class Divided”. For this task, you solely want to watch about 27 minutes of it (53 minutes complete; all of it is rather fascinating so I encourage you to watch as much of it as you can). Please remember that this was executed in a distinct historic time so clearly, incorporates references and procedures that almost definitely wouldn’t be allowed as we speak. FYI, there are various different reenactments of this (for instance, The Oprah Winfrey Present did one).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mcCLm_LwpE
Your activity for this dialogue is to present a social psychological commentary of varied issues that occurred within the quick examine. You should contemplate including just a little of your private opinion and utility to your personal experiences and people of others to make this commentary distinctive to you. Nonetheless, the massive a part of this commentary is to apply and analyze varied social psychological ideas/theories/analysis findings from the chapter as utilized to varied particulars of this examine.
As at all times, even when a few of this materials is disturbing or very private, I hope you get pleasure from this technique of studying. It would Help a few of you who have been disturbed by the methodoloy and the kids as members to know that Ms. Elliot adopted up along with her unique college students after they have been adults and so they indicated that they have been grateful and discovered so much from the expertise (as you can see within the latter a part of the video).
——–
QUESTION 1: Sexism (7 factors complete)
Please fill out Glick and Fiske’s (1996) “Ambivalent Sexism Stock” (ASI) at http://www.understandingprejudice.org/asi/.
This should take no more than 10 minutes, so you won’t have to put in too much effort. After finishing the ASI, you might be assigned TWO scores: one to your degree of hostile sexism and one to your degree of benevolent sexism. Additionally, you will give you the option to examine your outcomes to these of different individuals who accomplished the ballot on-line, in addition to some responses break up down by nation.
You can be contemplating each the scores and the ideas for this train.
1. Study and clarify your indignant and benign sexism SCORES (2.5pts).
(Please don’t present your precise scores within the public discussion board if you really feel uncomfortable doing so.)
