W3 Dialogue: Intentions
Choose either Option 1 or 2 for your Initial Posting.
Option 1. Do you establish extra with Kant’s deontology or Bentham’s Utilitarianism from Chapter 5? Is intention extra vital than penalties? Give an instance of a troublesome choice you made that you just really feel was the morally proper choice. Was your choice based mostly on intention, on penalties, or on a mixture of each?
Option 2. Check with Field 6.three on web page 254 in your textbook. Contemplate the concept that rationality creates good selections. Establish a choice you made that would have used extra cause (logic) to reach at a very good or ethical choice or establish a choice that you just made rationally that would have used extra emotion.
Instructions: Your preliminary publish must be a minimal of 250 phrases and will adequately reply the next requested. You need to then reply to 2 classmates by elaborating on one thing stated, giving clarification, or asking a Question Assignment. Every response publish must be between 25-50 phrases. Your preliminary publish is value 15 factors, and every response publish is value 5 factors. See the Syllabus for the grading standards.
second Question Assignment
. You could use your textbook or every other course content material with out citations. Nonetheless, if you happen to use information. from outdoors the course (on-line or print), please full an MLA quotation for every supply used. Your chapter abstract must be a minimal of 2 pages (MLA format).
In a journal format, reply or elaborate on the next:
1. Overview of Utilitarianism: In your personal phrases, clarify what you perceive about utilitarianisn. If somebody requested you what you studied on this chapter, what may you inform that individual? What remains to be complicated to you?
2. Overview of Kant’s Deontology: In your personal phrases, clarify what you perceive about Kant’s moral theories. If somebody requested you what you studied on this chapter, what may you inform that individual? What remains to be complicated to you?
three. Philosophers: Examine and distinction Immanuel Kant’s and Jeremy Bentham’s theories. What’s the essential distinction between them? Are there any similarities?
four. Reflection: Which idea do you want more–one that focuses on penalties or one which focuses on intent? Which do you suppose makes for a extra ethical society?
5. Clarification: Is there any idea that simply doesn’t make sense to you or that wants clarification
——
Dialogue in W3: Intentions
For your first posting, choose either Option 1 or Option 2.
Option 1: Do you favor Kant’s deontology or Bentham’s utilitarianism from Chapter 5? Is it extra essential to have a very good intention than to have a very good consequence? Give an instance of a troublesome choice you took that you just consider was morally appropriate. Was your choice influenced by your intention, the outcomes, or a mixture of the 2?
Option 2: Flip to web page 254 of your textbook and take a look at Field 6.three. Contemplate the notion that rationality results in good selections. Establish a choice you made which may have used extra cause (logic) to reach at a very good or ethical choice, or a rational choice that would have used extra emotion.
Directions: Your first publish must be
