Order custom papers, masters thesis and dissertation in 3 guided steps; human written!
Posted: January 28th, 2022
Human Dimensions of Computing
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT
Module Title: Human Dimensions of Computing Module Code: 4COM1035
Assignment Title: Design Report Individual Assignment
Tutor: Dr Catherine Menon Internal Moderator: Dr Sue Attwood
Marks Awarded %:
Marks Awarded after Lateness Penalty applied %:
We handpick every writer with care, ensuring they bring the perfect mix of academic qualifications and writing skills for top-notch results in essays, research papers, and dissertation help. Each one has a university degree, more than a third with Masters certification; they’ve tackled tough tests and training to excel in thesis writing and research paper assignments at any time. They’ll team up with you diligently, keeping things easy and stress-free as they relate to being immediate students. That’s what makes us the best assignment help website for "help me write my essay, research paper, or dissertation" for college coursework. Trust our team—professional research essay writers and editors—to deliver your dissertation or thesis writing within your grading criteria and deadline.
Penalties for Late Submissions Late submission of any item of coursework for each day or part thereof (or for hard copy submission only, working day or part thereof) for up to five days after the published deadline, coursework relating to modules at Levels 0, 4, 5, 6 submitted late (including deferred coursework, but with the exception of referred coursework), will have the numeric grade reduced by 10 grade points until or unless the numeric grade reaches or is 40. Where the numeric grade awarded for the assessment is less than 40, no lateness penalty will be applied. Late submission of referred coursework will automatically be awarded a grade of zero (0).Coursework (including deferred coursework) submitted later than five days (five working days in the case of hard copy submission) after the published deadline will be awarded a grade of zero (0).Where genuine serious adverse circumstances apply, you may apply for an extension to the hand-in date, provided the extension is requested a reasonable period in advance of the deadline.
Please refer to your student handbook for details about the grading schemes used by the School when assessing your work. Guidance on assessment will also be given in the Module Guide.
Guidance on avoiding academic assessment offences such as plagiarism and collusion is given at this URL: http://www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/ptl/common/LIS.nsf/lis/citing_menu
ASSIGNMENT BRIEF Students, you should delete this section before submitting your work.
This Assignment assesses the following module Learning Outcomes (Take these from the module DMD): 9a. Knowledge and Understanding: Successful students will typically have a knowledge and understanding of: the history and major accomplishments of computer science and IT; the importance and relevance of design principles in computer science, both for academic and business purposes; future trends, innovation, and horizon scanning in computing; the social, scientific and human aspects of computing and software engineering, how such aspects are relevant for business organisations, and therefore for their own academic progression and career development. 9b. Skills and Attributes: Successful students will typically be able to: describe and use principles of design for software development, UX (user experience) and other professional activities related to the exploitation of IT by individuals, organisations and businesses; gain, consolidate, pursue and manage some of the crucial skills expected of the IT professional: written communication, basic research methods, and basic calculations involving reasoning, probability and statistics for both academic and business purposes;describe and apply the above skills at an appropriate level within specific business-oriented case studies; to include effective individual and team communication, both in writing and verbally; demonstrate the effectiveness of inter-personal skills when engaging with stakeholders such as users or other team members.
Assignment Brief: You are required to submit a Word document containing a report and a software design diagram for a robot waiter. Your design must be a single diagram. Your report must not exceed 1200 words (+/- 10%).
Submission Requirements: You are required to submit a Word document containing your report via Studynet. Please note that you are encouraged to use Turnitin as part of your personal development.
This assignment is worth 40 % of the overall assessment for this module. Marks awarded for: Please see the detailed marking scheme below. A note to the Students: For undergraduate modules, a score above 40% represent a pass performance at honours level. For postgraduate modules, a score of 50% or above represents a pass mark.Modules may have several components of assessment and may require a pass in all elements. For further details, please consult the relevant Module Guide or ask the Module Leader.
Typical (hours) required by the student(s) to complete the assignment: 130 hours
Date Work handed out: 19 Oct 2020 Date Work to be handed in: 14 Nov 2020 Target Date for the return of the marked assignment: 18 Dec 2020
Type of Feedback to be given for this assignment: Feedback will be in the form of a score and tutor comments on your work. Feedback will be made available via Studynet and email.
Your task
AssignmentTutorOnline
As part of this assignment you are required to create a software design for a robot waiter.
No matter what citation style you need for your research paper or dissertation, our skilled writers have you covered! We provide thesis writing and dissertation help in formats like APA, AMA, MLA, Turabian, Harvard, IEEE, and more. We’re dedicated to customizing your order to the exact guidelines of your chosen style, ensuring it fits your unique academic needs—whether it’s a dissertation, research paper, or essay for a specific course. We’ve got the flexibility to make it work for you!
The design should identify the major software components, drawing on the principles of modular design introduced in the lectures. You should indicate the relationships and the information flow between software modules. The design should be included as a diagram within your Word document. You may wish to create the design in Powerpoint, Visio or another drawing program and paste the resultant picture into Word.
The focus of your report should be on the following questions:
You can absolutely reach out to your academic writer using our simple, user-friendly chat feature. It’s there so you can add details, clarify instructions, or tweak adjustments for editing your research paper or dissertation according to your grading rubric—even after you’ve submitted "help me with thesis writing or dissertation help" and they’ve started working on your project.
– What functions will your system provide?
– What accessibility features have you included and why?
You will be expected to draw on the principles of accessible design as discussed in the lectures. You might also use your knowledge and understanding of the topic as supplemented by:
• the module reading materials;
• secondary research
Please use the Harvard Referencing System (see http://www.studynet2.herts.ac.uk/ptl/common/LIS.nsf/lis/busharvard) to reference your sources.
There is no fixed structure for your report, but it would be important to ensure that the three components below are present:
1. Introduction and functionality.
Discuss what the functions provided by your system are. For example,
o Seating customers
o Taking customer orders
o Bringing food to the customer
o Payment and billing
These are not the only possible relevant functions, and you will need to justify your choices.
2. Accessibility of your design
Justify why your design is accessible. You will need to make specific references to your functional and design choices, and consider the different accommodations which must be made.
It is unlikely that your design will be accessible to all sections of society. You are required to justify why you have made the accessibility choices that you have.
3. References
You will need to include at least three references (the lecture material may count as one of these). You should use Harvard-style referencing, and your references do not count towards your word count.
Marking criteria (100 marks)
Criteria Fail 0-30 Marginal Fail 30-39 Marginal Pass 40 – 49 Clear Pass 50-59 Good 60-69 Very good 70-79 Excellent 80-89 Outstanding 90-100
Content Report: No discernible structure. Very difficult to follow. Many grammar/ spelling errors. No presentation of ideas. Report is too brief and/or incomplete. No evidence of evaluation. No references. Design: Poor design. A substantial number of user needs are neglected and the accessibility challenges are inadequately addressed. Limited and unrealistic conceptualization of technological capability. Lack of a demonstrated understanding demonstrated of modular design. Report: content factually incorrect in several major aspects. Content inadequately expressed content. Ideas not clearly presented and logic of these omitted. Report omits necessary detail and explanation. No evidence of critical evaluation. No or inadequate references Design: Inadequate design. No accessibility challenges have been identified. Unrealistic or limited conceptualization of technological capability. Lack of a demonstrated understanding demonstrated of modular design. Report: content factually correct but inadequately expressed content. Ideas understandable, but not clearly presented. Report is adequate, but lacks sufficient detail. Very limited evidence of critical evaluation. Marginally adequate references Design: Marginally adequate design. Limited accessibility challenges have been identified. Unrealistic or limited conceptualization of technological capability. Limited understanding demonstrated of modular design. Report: Report lacks some clarity and has grammar, spelling, structure errors. Ideas not always clearly presented. Satisfactory report, but report tends to be descriptive and/or lacking details/explanations. Limited evidence of critical evaluation. Adequate references. Design: Satisfactory design. Some accessibility challenges have been identified. Unrealistic or limited conceptualization of technological capability. Limited understanding demonstrated of
ASSIGNMENT OF COURSEWORK IN HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF COMPUTING
Human Dimensions of Computing is a 4COM1035 module with the title Human Dimensions of Computing.
Design Report Individual Assignment is the title of the assignment.
Dr. Catherine Menon is the tutor.
Dr. Sue Attwood, internal moderator
Percentage of marks awarded:
Percentage of marks awarded when lateness penalty is applied:
Late Submissions Penalties Late submission of any item of coursework for each day or part thereof (or for hard copy submission only, working day or part thereof) for up to five days after the published deadline, coursework relating to modules at Levels 0, 4, 5, 6 submitted late (including deferred coursework, but excluding referred coursework) will have the numeric grade reduced by ten points until or unless the numeric grade reaches or is 40. Where the assessment was given a numerical grade
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
We’ve put together our writing team with care, choosing talented writers who shine in their fields. Each one goes through a tough selection process, where we look for folks with deep expertise in specific subjects and a solid history of academic writing. They bring their own mix of know-how and flair to the table, making sure our content hits the mark—packed with info, easy to read, and perfect for college students like you.
We don’t do AI-written essays or copycat work—everything’s original. Competitive pricing is a big deal for us; we keep costs fair while delivering top-notch quality. Our writers are some of the best out there, and we charge rates that stack up well against other services. This means you get stellar content without draining your wallet. Our pricing is straightforward and honest, built to give you real value for your money. That’s why students turn to us for high-quality writing services that won’t break the bank.
Academic integrity is at the heart of what we do. Every paper starts from scratch, with original research and writing tailored just for you. We write 100% authentic—no plagiarism research essays. Our strict quality control process includes scanning every draft with top tools like SafeAssign and Turnitin, so you get a similarity score and proof of originality. We’re obsessive about proper citation and referencing too, crediting every source to keep things legit. It’s all about giving you peace of mind with content that meets the highest standards.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Writer, here is what happens: