Assignment #four – Professional Ethics & the Law Individual Assignment
CSE 4314 Professional Practices
Ethics State of affairs Assessment Report
You’ll examine and analyze the assigned ethics state of affairs from Baase, Chapter 9, and write a report protecting the following subjects.
What’s (are) the moral concern(s) that want(s) to be addressed – dangers, points, issues, penalties?
Are there authorized ramifications & penalties, in that case how are they totally different from the moral ramifications & penalties?
Who’re the stakeholders – advantages, impression?
What are the doable actions that may be taken?
What are the obligations of the resolution maker?
What’s the most acceptable motion to take?
Report size – 2 to three pages not Together with Title Web page, Desk of Content material, References, and Tutorial Integrity Kind
Due date – See Class Schedule (Submit by way of Canvas Assignment Portal)
See Syllabus for Due Date, late submissions is not going to be accepted with no legitimate and documented cause.
Wonderful (5 pts) Good (four pts) Satisfac-tory (three pts) Poor (2 pts) Unacceptable (1 pt)
Description of the moral concern being studied – doable penalties Informative, insightful and correct description of moral concern said. Associated Penalties delineated totally. Recognized most factors associated to essential moral concern, good description with ample penalties recognized Most key factors associated to the description of the moral concern recognized however not all, a number of key penalties famous. Partial description of moral concern given. Penalties recognized had been incomplete or nebulous Severely missing info content material and accuracy. Misidentified moral dilemma and gave no or incorrect penalties
Identification of the stakeholders – impression on them Recognized all key stakeholders with convincing justification. Full identification of impacts for major and secondary stakeholders – effectively said with convincing causes. Recognized a number of key stakeholders with different peripheral stakeholders additionally recognized, good justification given with key impacts recognized and why they had been key. Major stakeholder with most to lose recognized given with good justification, key impression recognized. Recognized peripherally concerned stakeholder as major, justification given was poor, missed vital impacts on stakeholders Failure to Help selection of Stakeholders and impacts given had been nebulous and never effectively based
Identification of stakeholders and their obligations Complete and correct historical past with identification of vital obligations, given phrase restrict constraints. Good and pretty correct/full historical past with identification of obligations of key stakeholders Most key stake holders and their obligations recognized, extra background info might have been given Missed a number of historic factors associated to key stakeholders and their obligations inflicting some uncertainty associated to moral concern Lacking most essential milestones, severely inaccurate with mis-identification of who was affected and why
Description of the motion taken and its appropriateness. Complete and correct itemizing and good justification. Concise & exact language used to convey vital actions. Good and correct itemizing of justification. Used good language to explain actions taken that was simply adopted Missed a number of key justifications associated to actions taken. Language used was considerably ambiguous Come across 1 or 2 required actions that needs to be taken, nevertheless language used to explain them was ambiguous and complicated Lacking virtually all essential impacts, severely inaccurate.
Description of other actions. Complete and correct itemizing and good justification. Recognized the affordable vital actions with good reasoning proven as to why Missed 1 or 2 vital actions that ought to have been taken, however these recognized had been correct. Missed all however 1 vital motion that ought to have been taken, description missing Lacking virtually all essential impacts, severely inaccurate.
References Right use of references, supporting each declare in the textual content, right formatting of references. Right use of references. Most essential claims supported by references. No more than 2 minor errors with references in appendix Acceptable use of refences with some issues of in-text quotation. Most claims supported. No more than three to five minor errors with refences in appendix Some inconsistency in the use of references supporting textual claims. Much less consideration paid to formatting in the use of Reference record in appendix. 5 or 6 errors max in the use of references Virtually no references, virtually all claims not supported, severely problematic format with larger than 6 errors.
Grammar No errors, right utilization of English all through the essay. Right use of English with lower than 5 minor punctuation errors. Largely correct use of English however extra consideration needs to be paid to punctuation and guidelines of grammar reminiscent of noun-verb matching, fewer 1/5 of all sentences contained error. Usually acceptable use of Grammar, some slang/colloquiaterms used, Extra focus needs to be utilized in correcting noun-verb errors, minor errors in much less 1/5 to lower than 1/three sentences. Frequent errors, greater than 1/three sentences comprise grammar errors.
Spelling No spelling or capitalization errors. 2 or much less spelling errors in paper. three to four spelling errors in paper. 5 to 7 spelling errors in paper. Quite a few spelling errors, greater than 5% of the phrases are misspelled.
Group Excellent group, following specified format. Excellent transitioning with acceptable verbiage. Every paragraph/part logical tied to predecessor with transitioning language Good group, with one part main into subsequent part with good use of transition phrases. Every paragraph/part logical tied collectively Passable group of paper. Reasoning simply adopted from one part to the subsequent. Poor group, not effectively thought out, nevertheless, with some effort storyline was traceable from one part to the subsequent. Unacceptible group, poor adherence to the format, disjointed elements with poor connections/transitions between them.
Readability The purpose(s) of every sentence, paragraph, and part is (are) clear and unambiguous, exactly and concisely said. The purpose(s) of every sentence, paragraph, and part had been clear and unambiguous. Might have used few phrases. The purpose(s) of every sentence, paragraph, and part had been comprehensible however in 1 or 2 cases complicated phrase selection interfered with meant that means. The purpose(s) of most sentences, paragraph, and part weren’t simply discernable. Some selection of phrases overly difficult meant that means. Complicated and unclear writing, at the least half the content material lacks in readability.
Assignment #four – Moral State of affairs Rubric
—-
Individual Assignment #four – Professional Ethics & the Law
Professional Practices (CSE 4314)
Report on Ethics State of affairs Assessment
You’ll analysis and analyze the assigned ethics state of affairs from Baase, Chapter 9, and write a report on the subjects listed beneath.
What are the moral concern(s) that should be addressed – dangers, points, issues, and penalties?
Are there authorized ramifications and penalties, and in that case, how do they differ from moral ramifications and penalties?
Who’re the stakeholders – what are their advantages and impacts?
What are the doable programs of motion?
What are the decision-responsibilities? maker’s
What’s the greatest plan of action to take?
Report size – 2 to three pages (excluding the title web page, desk of contents, references, and Tutorial Integrity Kind).
Due date – See Class Schedule (Submit through Canvas)
