Project Planning and Budgeting
PROJ6002_Assessment_3_Brief_Memo_Module 5 Web page 1 of 5
ASSESSMENT three BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PROJ6002: Project Planning and Budgeting
Assessment Price and Schedule Administration Written Exercise (Memo – Change
Request and Justification)
Particular person/Group Particular person
Size 1000 phrases
Studying Outcomes The Subject Studying Outcomes demonstrated by profitable
completion of the duty under embody:
(a) Consider and apply a variety of mission administration
instruments, strategies and practices to various international
tasks.
(b) Consider budgetary and planning outcomes towards mission
success measures, together with stakeholder expectations.
(c) Analyse and show efficient communication strategies
to articulate planning outcomes to key stakeholders.
Submission Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of First Half of Module 5
Weighting 15%
Whole Marks 100 marks
AssignmentTutorOnline
Assessment Job
On this Assessment you’ll full an individually written exercise, within the type of a 1000-
phrase memo that addresses the Assessment three situation Question Assignment outlined within the Case Examine
given to you by the Studying Facilitator.
Please check with the Directions for particulars on tips on how to full this activity.
Context
Project Schedule and value administration are two interconnected points of mission
administration. Together with scope, they kind the triple constraint and a standard conventional
measure of mission success, as ‘on time, on funds, and to specification’.
Project Schedule Administration consists of all processes concerned in planning, estimating,
sequencing, managing, and controlling the mission schedule. Project Price Administration
consists of planning, estimating, budgeting, funding, managing, and controlling prices to make sure
the mission is accomplished inside funds.
PROJ6002_Assessment_3_Brief_Memo_Module 5 Web page 2 of 5
Directions
1. Obtain the Case Examine and the Memo template from the Assessments part in
Blackboard, offered by your Studying Facilitator.
2. Analyse the offered case research, paying explicit consideration to mission schedule and value
complexities.
three. Write a 1000-word memo to the Project Sponsor (your Studying Facilitator) utilizing the
offered template, in response to the Assessment three Question Assignment. In your memo, define the
following:
a. Your particular person suggestions for managing the mission. Your
suggestions ought to leverage the scope administration plan and scope
assertion you submitted in Assessment 2.
b. How you’d apply mission time schedule and value administration instruments and
strategies to reply to the situation described within the Question Assignment within the assigned
case research.
four. You need to use educational sources to Help your Assessment, together with studying sources
and educational or business literature. All sources must be cited utilizing appropriate APA
Referencing. The reference checklist will not be included within the phrase depend.
Referencing
It’s important that you simply use the newest APA fashion for citing and referencing analysis.
Please see extra data on referencing within the Tutorial Abilities webpage.
Submission Directions
Submit this activity by way of the Assessment three hyperlink to in the principle navigation menu in PROJ6002 –
Project Planning and Budgeting.
Submit your solutions in a tutorial fashion, together with each in-text citations and a full
reference checklist utilizing the proper APA fashion of referencing.
PROJ6002_Assessment_3_Brief_Memo_Module 5 Web page three of 5
Your Assessment might be formally graded by way of the Grade Centre by your Studying Facilitator and
suggestions might be offered by My Grades.
Tutorial Integrity
All college students are answerable for guaranteeing that every one work submitted is their very own and is
appropriately referenced and academically written based on the Tutorial Writing Information.
College students additionally have to have learn and concentrate on Torrens College Australia Tutorial
Integrity Coverage and Process and subsequent penalties for tutorial misconduct. These are
viewable on-line.
College students should additionally make a copy of all submitted materials and any Assessment drafts.
Particular Consideration
To use for particular consideration for a modification to an Assessment or examination on account of
sudden or extenuating circumstances, please seek the advice of the Assessment Coverage for Greater
Training Coursework and ELICOS, and, if relevant to your circumstance, submit a
accomplished Utility for Assessment Particular Consideration Kind to your Studying
Facilitator.
PROJ6002_Assessment_3_Brief_Memo_Module 5 Web page four of 5
Assessment Rubric
Assessment
Attributes Fail
(But to attain
minimal customary)
Zero-49% Go
(Practical)
50-64% Credit score
(Proficient)
65-74% Distinction
(Superior)
75-84% Excessive Distinction
(Extremely superior)
85-100%
Data and
understanding of
mission schedule and
value administration.
Applies mission schedule
and value administration
instruments and strategies.
Share for this
criterion = 35 % Demonstrates a partially
developed understanding
of mission scope, schedule
and value administration.
Doesn’t handle key
elements of the
task together with
utility of related
instruments and strategies to
mission planning. Demonstrates a practical
information of mission scope,
schedule and value
administration.
Demonstrates a restricted
utility of mission scope,
schedule and value instruments and
strategies to mission
planning. Demonstrates proficient
information of mission
scope, schedule and value
administration.
Demonstrates a proficient
utility of mission
scope, schedule and value
instruments and strategies to
mission planning. Demonstrates superior
information of mission scope,
schedule and value
administration.
Demonstrates a complicated
utility of mission
scope, schedule and value
instruments and strategies to
mission planning. Demonstrates distinctive
information of mission
scope, schedule and value
administration.
Demonstrates an
distinctive utility of
mission scope, schedule and
value instruments and strategies
to mission planning.
Successfully analyses the
case research and
recommends
applicable mission
scope, schedule and
value administration instruments
and strategies.
Share for this
criterion = 35 % Very restricted Assessment of
data associated to the
assigned case research.
Doesn’t make
suggestions for
mission scope, schedule
and value administration
instruments and strategies.
Very restricted vary of
specialised language and
terminology with frequent
errors. Restricted Assessment of
data associated to the
assigned case research.
Makes primary
suggestions for mission
scope, schedule and value
administration instruments and
strategies.
Restricted vary of specialized
language and terminology,
with some errors. Satisfactory Assessment of
data associated to the
assigned case research.
Makes well-developed
suggestions for
mission scope, schedule and
value administration instruments and
strategies.
Satisfactory vary of
specialised language and
terminology, with
occasional errors. Skilful Assessment of
data associated to the
assigned case research.
Makes totally
developed
suggestions for
mission scope, schedule and
value administration instruments and
strategies.
Vary of specialized
language and terminology,
with only a few errors. Very skilful Assessment of
data associated to the
assigned case research.
Makes extremely refined
and inventive
suggestions for
mission scope schedule and
value administration instruments and
strategies.
Big selection of specialized
language and terminology,
with no errors.
PROJ6002_Assessment_3_Brief_Memo_Module 5 Web page 5 of 5
Assessment
Attributes Fail
(But to attain
minimal customary)
Zero-49% Go
(Practical)
50-64% Credit score
(Proficient)
65-74% Distinction
(Superior)
75-84% Excessive Distinction
(Extremely superior)
85-100%
Efficient
Communication
(Written)
Share for this
criterion = 20% Very restricted organisation,
textual content, construction and
coherence.
Frequent errors in
spelling, grammar and/or
punctuation. Restricted organisation, textual content,
construction and coherence.
Some errors in spelling,
grammar and/or punctuation. Satisfactory organisation,
textual content, construction and
coherence.
Occasional errors in
spelling, grammar and/or
punctuation. Good organisation, textual content,
construction and coherence.
Only a few errors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. Superb organisation,
textual content, construction and
coherence.
No errors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation.
Appropriate quotation of key
sources and proof
Share for this
criterion = 10% Demonstrates very restricted
use of excellent high quality,
credible and related
sources to Help and
develop concepts.
Didn’t check with sources;
referencing doesn’t
resemble the newest
version of APA. Demonstrates restricted use of
credible and related
sources to Help and
develop concepts.
Hardly ever referred to sources;
makes use of most up-to-date version of
APA referencing with
frequent errors. Demonstrates satisfactory
use of credible sources to
Help and develop concepts.
Exhibits proof of
satisfactory scope inside
Torrens College
sources for sourcing
proof.
Adequately referred to
sources; makes use of most up-to-date
version of APA referencing
with occasional errors. Demonstrates use of excellent
high quality, credible and
related sources to
Help and develop
arguments and statements.
Exhibits proof of vast
scope inside Torrens
College sources for
sourcing proof.
Referred to sources
all through; makes use of most
latest version of APA
referencing used with very
few errors. Demonstrates use of excessive
high quality, credible and
related sources to
Help and develop
arguments and place
statements.
Exhibits proof of vast
scope and shifting past
Torrens College
sources for sourcing
proof.
Referred to sources
all through; makes use of most
latest version of APA
referencing used with no
errors.
————
Project Planning and Budgeting PROJ6002_Assessment_3_Brief_Memo_Module 5 Web page 1 of 5
BRIEFING FOR THE THIRD ASSESSMENT
Subject Code and Title PROJ6002: Project Planning and Budgeting
Assessment Price and Schedule Administration Written Exercise (Memo – Change
Request and Justification)
Particular person/Group Particular person
Size 1000 phrases
Studying Outcomes
The Subject Studying Outcomes demonstrated by profitable
completion of the duty under embody:
(a) Consider and apply a variety of mission administration
instruments, strategies and practices to various international
tasks.
(b) Consider budgetary and planning outcomes towards mission
success measures, together with stakeholder expectations.
(c) Analyse and show efficient communication strategies
to articulate planning outcomes to key stakeholders.
Submission Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of First Half of Module 5
Weighting 15%
Whole Marks 100 marks
AssignmentTutorOnline
Assessment Job
On this Assessment you’ll
