ASSESSMENT three BRIEF
Topic Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking
Assessment Written Report
Particular person/Group Particular person
Size As much as 2000 phrases
Studying Outcomes c) Analyse, choose and apply techniques modelling instruments in integrating, optimising and enhancing enterprise processes inside up to date organisations
d) Synthesise technological and non-technological options to enterprise issues that promote integration and that optimise whole-of-enterprise operations
Submission By 11:55 pm (AEDT/AEST Time) Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week 11) For intensive class:
By 11:55 pm (AEDT/AEST Time) Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week 5)
Weighting 40%
Whole Marks 40 Marks
Assessment Process and Context
There are two approaches in direction of bettering techniques, short-term approaches that usually addresses the signs and barely Help perceive and handle the reason for the issue, and longterm approaches, which permit managers to deal with the actual trigger(s) of the issue. On this Assessment, college students will attempt to resolve a sensible downside by utilizing Systems Thinking instruments referred to as System Archetypes mixed with worth stream mapping.
Directions
MGT603 Assessment three is about uncovering the complexities in operations administration usually, figuring out key themes, meant and unintended penalties and proposing a holistic answer to the issue utilizing a Systems Thinking lens. The next state of affairs research supplies you with a short overview of a hypothetical downside. Remember that the state of affairs offered might not cowl each element that you will want to deal with within the Written Report, wherein case, you will want to conduct extra analysis, together with additional analysis on how emergency departments operate in any hospital.
Situation Overview
Think about your self as a part of a group accountable for managing the operations of an emergency division of a public hospital. The emergency division has obtained suggestions from sufferers suggesting that the affected person wait occasions must be improved. The worth stream map of the present operations is proven within the connected diagram.
The Worth Stream Map is could be Discovered by way of the Assessment Hyperlink.
“You may have been tasked with bettering affected person turnaround time by lowering the present time to half”. To finish the duty you’re required to “determine the varied System Archetypes that have an effect on the operations of the hospital and the emergency division itself” and primarily based on the archetypes, develop a future State Worth Stream Map of the emergency division.
You’ll require to determine and critically analyse the meant and unintended penalties, recommending holistic options that can optimise the operations of the emergency division with out compromising the efficiency of different features of the hospital.
Steered format:
Your MGT603 written report ought to embody all the next sections and sub-sections. Please make certain to quantity all sections and sub-sections.
Project Cowl Sheet (Particular person)
(Discovered by way of the next hyperlink: https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-forms)
Govt Abstract
Desk of Contents
1. Introduction/Background
2. Primary Dialogue
2.1. Assessment of the present state Worth Stream Map of the emergency division primarily based on system archetypes
2.2. Identification and Assessment of the system archetypes which will impede efficiency
2.three. Advisable new State Worth Stream Map with desired discount in affected person turnaround time
2.four. Dialogue on Meant and unintended penalties of the modified system
three. Conclusion
four. Suggestions 5. References
College students require to make important references to the topic materials and substantial wider studying. A minimal of 5 (5) academic-related (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles, books chapters, college sources, convention papers) and a minimal of two (2) different references (e.g. newspaper articles, trade reviews, and and so on.) are required on this Assessment. References to ‘Wikipedia’ or comparable unsubstantiated sources won’t be accepted.
College students ought to use the Assessment transient to information what to incorporate within the Assessment and use the offered case research to Help show understanding of the subject.
Be sure that your MGT603 Assessment three is unique and doesn’t self-plagiarise any earlier content material written for different assessments.
The submission should be in WORD doc format and should comprise a “signed” Assessment cowl sheet.
Referencing
It’s important that college students use acceptable APA type for citing and referencing analysis. Please see extra data on referencing right here within the Tutorial Writing Information discovered by way of the Tutorial Expertise web site.
Tutorial Integrity
All college students are accountable for making certain that each one work submitted is their very own and is appropriately referenced and academically written in response to the Tutorial Writing Information. College students additionally have to have learn and pay attention to Torrens College Australia Tutorial Integrity Coverage and Process and subsequent penalties for tutorial misconduct. These are viewable on-line. College students additionally should make a copy of all submitted materials and any Assessment drafts.
Submission Directions
Please submit the MGT603 Assessment three by way of the Assessment hyperlink in the primary navigation menu in MGT603 Systems considering on the Pupil Portal. The Studying Facilitator will present suggestions by way of Grade Centre within the Pupil Portal. Suggestions could be considered in “My Grades”.
Assessment Rubric: MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment three Written Report
Assessment Attributes Fail
(But to realize minimal customary)
Zero-49% Move
(Purposeful)
50-64% Credit score
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Superior)
75-84% Excessive Distinction
(Distinctive)
85-100%
Understanding of analysis ideas and strategies
relevant to
MBA
Proportion for
this criterion =
20%
The main target for the analysis Question Assignment(s) or foundation for the mission is unclear.
The rational for the analysis methodology is inappropriate for the analysis Question Assignment/mission. The main target for the analysis Question Assignment(s) or foundation for mission is sufficiently clear.
The rationale for the analysis methodology is suitable for the analysis Question Assignment/mission. The main target for the analysis Question Assignment(s) or foundation for mission is evident.
The rationale for the analysis methodology is acknowledged and acceptable for the analysis Question Assignment/mission. The main target for the analysis Question Assignment(s) or foundation for mission could be very clear.
The rationale for the analysis methodology is in contrast with options and the chosen methodology is suitable for the analysis Question Assignment/mission. The main target for the analysis Question Assignment(s) or foundation for mission is exceptionally clear.
The rationale for the analysis methodology is critically in contrast and evaluated towards options and the chosen methodology is suitable for the analysis Question Assignment/mission.
Data and understanding (technical and theoretical information).
Understands theoretical fashions and ideas and instruments and strategies of techniques considering Restricted understanding of required ideas and information.
Key elements of the project are usually not addressed.
No dialogue on techniques ideas and instruments resembling system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Data or understanding of the sphere or self-discipline. The flexibility to grasp and know (technical and theoretical information).
Has a restricted understanding of the required theoretical fashions and conceptualizations, in addition to the instruments and processes of techniques considering and Assessment.
The project’s most essential elements are usually not lined.
There isn’t a therapy of techniques ideas and strategies resembling system dynamics, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams, or different comparable ideas. Data or understanding of the subject material or self-discipline.
It resembles a recollection or a abstract of essential ideas.
The declaration of private opinion is continuously confused with information verified by proof derived from thorough information or comprehension of the subject or self-discipline/s. Private opinion and data that has been substantiated by proof from the analysis/course supplies are supported.
Has the flexibility to clarify and defend a effectively developed understanding of the subject or self-discipline/s
It distinguishes between assertions of private opinion and information that has been substantiated by substantial proof from analysis/course supplies and prolonged studying.
A complicated understanding of the sphere or self-discipline/s wherein you’re employed.
The flexibility to differentiate between assertions of private opinion and information justified by substantial proof from analysis/course supplies and in depth studying is demonstrated by way of systematic and important considering.
its implications for operations administration approaches, and their applicability
Proportion of the whole
this criterion is the same as
30 % Lack of ability to use worth stream mapping to operations administration decision-making as a result of a lack of knowledge and utility.
Supplies for analysis and classroom work on techniques ideas and instruments like as system dynamics, system archetypes, and informal loop diagrams, amongst others; Lack of ability to use worth stream mapping to operations administration decision-making due to a scarcity of clear understanding and utility system dynamics, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams, and different related ideas and instruments from the sphere of techniques concept and engineering. Understands and applies worth stream mapping in a sensible setting.
Capability to clarify and apply key techniques concepts and instruments, resembling system dynamics, system archetypes, and causal loop diagrams, has been demonstrated up to now. Demonstrates an intensive understanding of and proficiency within the utility of worth stream mapping The flexibility to grasp ideas and apply them to new conditions/additional studying of techniques ideas and instruments resembling system dynamics, system archetypes, and causal loop diagrams Demonstrates superior comprehension and reasoning
Resembles a recall or abstract of key concepts.
Usually confuses assertion of private opinion with data substantiated by proof from the Thorough information or understanding of the sphere or self-discipline/s. Helps private opinion and data substantiated by proof from the analysis/course supplies.
Demonstrates a capability to clarify Extremely developed understanding of the sphere or self-discipline/s.
Discriminates between assertion of private opinion and data substantiated by sturdy proof from the analysis/course supplies and prolonged studying.
A complicated understanding of the sphere or self-discipline/s.
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of private opinion and data substantiated by sturdy proof from the analysis/course supplies and prolonged studying.
and their functions to operations administration practices.
Proportion for
this criterion =
30% Lack of knowledge and utility of worth stream mapping to operations administration determination making.
analysis/course supplies on techniques ideas and instruments resembling system dynamic, system archetypes, informal loop diagrams. Lack of clear understanding and utility of worth stream mapping to operations administration determination making. and apply related ideas of techniques ideas and instruments resembling system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates understanding and utility of worth stream mapping.
Nicely demonstrated capability to clarify and apply related ideas of techniques ideas and instruments resembling system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates good understanding and utility of worth stream mapping. Mastery of ideas and utility to new conditions/additional Studying of techniques ideas and instruments resembling system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates wonderful understanding and
utility of worth stream mapping
Efficient Written
Communication
Proportion for this criterion =
15% Obscure for viewers, no logical/clear construction, poor circulation of concepts, argument lacks supporting proof.
Viewers can not comply with the road of reasoning. Info, arguments and proof are offered in a method that’s not at all times clear and logical.
Line of reasoning is usually troublesome to comply with. Info, arguments and proof are effectively offered, largely clear circulation of concepts and arguments.
Line of reasoning is simple to comply with. Info, arguments and proof are very effectively offered; the presentation is logical, clear and effectively supported by proof.
Demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Expertly offered; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and effectively supported by proof, demonstrating a transparent circulation of concepts and arguments.
Engages and sustains viewers’s curiosity within the subject, demonstrates excessive ranges of cultural sensitivity Efficient use of various presentation aids, together with graphics and multimedia.
Assessment and utility with synthesis of recent
information
Restricted synthesis and Assessment.
Restricted
utility/recommenda Demonstrated Assessment and synthesis of recent information with utility.
Nicely-developed Assessment and synthesis with utility of suggestions Completely developed and artistic Assessment and synthesis with utility of pretested fashions and / or independently Extremely subtle and artistic Assessment, synthesis of recent with present information. Sturdy utility by the use of
Proportion for this criterion =
25% tions primarily based upon Assessment. Exhibits the flexibility to interpret related data and literature. linked to Assessment/synthesis. developed fashions and
justified
suggestions linked to Assessment/synthesis. pretested fashions and / or independently developed fashions. Suggestions
are clearly justified primarily based on the Assessment/synthesis. Making use of information to new conditions/different circumstances.
Right quotation of key sources
and proof
Proportion for
this criterion =
10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of sources to help and develop concepts. Demonstrates use of credible and related sources to help and develop concepts, however these are usually not at all times specific or effectively developed. Demonstrates use of top quality, credible and related sources to help and develop concepts. Demonstrates use of fine high quality, credible and related sources to help and develop statements. Exhibits proof of vast scope for sourcing proof. Demonstrates use of highquality, credible and related sources to help and develop statements. Exhibits proof of vast scope for sourcing proof.
The next Topic Studying Outcomes are addressed on this Assessment
SLO a) Critically consider the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and its utility to up to date enterprise points
SLO b) Create a visible depiction of a multi-dimensional advanced scenario that represents differing views
SLO c) Analyse, choose and apply techniques modelling instruments in integrating, optimising and enhancing enterprise processes inside up to date organisations
SLO d) Synthesise technological and non-technological options to enterprise issues that promote integration and that optimise whole-ofenterprise operations

Published by

Write

View all posts