Best evidence rule implemented into the US
courtroom system
Best evidence rule implemented into the US courtroom system
Throughout trial preparation, you’re directed by the Helpant U.S.
Lawyer (AUSA) to deliver the tapes of intercepted conversations
involving a primary suspect in your case to her workplace. You present
the evidence custodian with the vital paperwork and are
ready for the tapes to be produced. After 20 minutes, the
custodian comes again and asks if you’re positive you might have supplied
the right case and exhibit numbers. You confirm the numbers and
are informed the authentic tapes can’t be discovered.
You instantly inform your supervisor, who’s understandably
involved. You’ve the paperwork documenting the proven fact that
the tapes had been transferred to the custody of the evidence
custodian. The opposite brokers in the workplace are requested whether or not they
have any data of this matter. Nobody has any thought as to
what occurred to the authentic tapes.
You and your supervisor name the AUSA and clarify to her what
has occurred. She is livid and tells you to not be stunned if
the decide throws out the whole case. You remind her that she has
duplicate copies in her possession and that you’ve your working
copies as properly. She says her copies had been barely audible, and
apparently there was some drawback with the recording
gear. You resolve to perform a little research on the greatest evidence
rule.

Published by

Write

View all posts