NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
Permalink: https://nursingpapermills.com/nrs428vn-benchma…brief-assignment/
Analysis public well being points on the “Local weather Change” or “Matters and Points” pages of the American Public Well being Affiliation (APHA) web site. Examine a public well being subject associated to an environmental subject throughout the U.S. well being care supply system and look at its impact on a selected inhabitants. NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
Write a 750-1,00Zero-word coverage transient that summarizes the difficulty, explains the impact on the inhabitants, and proposes an answer to the difficulty.
Observe this define when writing the coverage transient:
Describe the coverage well being subject. Embody the next info: (a) what inhabitants is affected, (b) at what degree does it happen (native, state, or nationwide), and (c) proof in regards to the points supported by assets.
Create an issue assertion.
Present recommendations for addressing the well being subject brought on by the present coverage. Describe what steps are required to provoke coverage change. Embody crucial stakeholders (authorities officers, administrator) and price range or funding issues, if relevant.
Talk about the impression on the well being care supply system.
Embody three peer-reviewed sources and two different sources to help the coverage transient.
Put together this project in keeping with the rules discovered within the APA Model Information, situated within the Pupil Success Middle.
This project makes use of a rubric. Please assessment the rubric previous to starting the project to develop into aware of the expectations for profitable completion.
You might be required to submit this project to LopesWrite. A hyperlink to the LopesWrite technical help articles is situated in Course Supplies if you happen to want help.
Benchmark Data
Registered Nurse to Bachelor of Science in Nursing
The benchmark assesses the next competencies:
1.four Take part in well being care coverage growth to affect nursing apply and well being care.
Rubric
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Complete Factors
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O503 Benchmark – Policy Brief 120.Zero
Standards Proportion Unsatisfactory (Zero.00%) Much less Than Passable (80.00%) Passable (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Glorious (100.00%) Feedback Factors Earned
Content material 80.Zero%
Description of Policy Well being Concern 20.Zero% Description of the coverage subject is omitted. An incomplete description of the coverage subject is offered. The origin of this coverage is unclear. There is no such thing as a proof that this coverage creates a well being subject, or that it is a matter for the inhabitants chosen. The extent at which the difficulty happens has not been recognized. There are main inaccuracies. An outline of the coverage subject is summarized. The origin of the coverage is described, however it’s unclear why the coverage creates a well being subject for the inhabitants chosen. The extent at which the difficulty happens is recognized. There are some inaccuracies. Extra info and rationale are wanted. A basic description of the coverage subject is offered. The origin of the coverage is described and a correlation between the coverage and the well being subject for the inhabitants chosen is established. The extent at which this happens is mentioned. Some rationale or element is required for readability. An in depth description of the coverage subject is offered. The origin of the coverage is described and a robust correlation between the coverage and the well being subject for the inhabitants chosen is established. The extent at which this happens is mentioned. Robust rationale and proof are supplied for help. Perception into the coverage well being subject is demonstrated.
Drawback Assertion 20.Zero% An issue assertion isn’t included. An issue assertion is current however lacks element or is incomplete. Topic information is unclear or inconsistent. An issue assertion is current. Some topic information is obvious.r An issue assertion is included, and topic information is competent. An issue assertion is totally developed with supporting particulars. NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
Recommendations for Addressing the Policy Well being Concern (C1.four) 20.Zero% Recommendations for addressing the coverage well being subject will not be included. Recommendations for addressing the coverage well being subject are incomplete. Recommendations don’t embrace all project standards. The recommendations don’t help coverage change for the coverage well being subject. Recommendations for addressing the difficulty are current. Some topic information is obvious. Most project standards are met. The recommendations usually define steps for coverage change. Extra info or proof is required. Recommendations for addressing the difficulty are current, and topic information is competent. All project standards are met. The recommendations define steps for coverage change. Minor element is required for readability. Recommendations for addressing the difficulty are totally developed with supporting particulars. All project standards are met and well-supported. The recommendations are well-supported and supply clear steps for initiating coverage change.
Influence on Well being Care Supply System 20.Zero% A dialogue on the impression on the well being care supply system isn’t included. A dialogue on the impression on the well being care supply system is current however lacks element or is incomplete. Topic information is unclear or inconsistent. A dialogue on the impression on the well being care supply system is current. Some topic information is obvious. A dialogue on the impression on the well being care supply system is current, and topic information is competent. A dialogue on the impression on the well being care supply system is totally developed with supporting particulars.
Group, Effectiveness, and Format 20.Zero%
Thesis Growth and Goal 5.Zero% Paper lacks any discernible general function or organizing declare. Thesis is insufficiently developed or imprecise. Goal isn’t clear. Thesis is obvious and applicable to function. Thesis is evident and forecasts the event of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and applicable to the aim. Thesis is complete and incorporates the essence of the paper. Thesis assertion makes the aim of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Development 5.Zero% Assertion of function isn’t justified by the conclusion. The conclusion doesn’t help the declare made. Argument is incoherent and makes use of noncredible sources. Adequate justification of claims is missing. Argument lacks constant unity. There are apparent flaws within the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly however might have a couple of inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, however not totally, helps the aim. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument reveals logical development. Strategies of argumentation are evident. There’s a clean development of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive declare in a particular and compelling method. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.Zero% Floor errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of that means. Inappropriate phrase alternative or sentence building is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language alternative (register) or phrase alternative are current. Sentence construction is right however not different. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they aren’t overly distracting to the reader. Appropriate and different sentence construction and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is essentially freed from mechanical errors, though a couple of could also be current. The author makes use of a wide range of efficient sentence constructions and figures of speech. Author is clearly in charge of commonplace, written, educational English.
Paper Format (use of applicable fashion for the key and project) 2.Zero% Template isn’t used appropriately, or documentation format isn’t adopted appropriately. Applicable template is used, however some parts are lacking or mistaken. An absence of management with formatting is obvious. Applicable template is used. Formatting is right, though some minor errors could also be current. Applicable template is totally used. There are just about no errors in formatting fashion. All format parts are right.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and so forth., as applicable to project and magnificence) three.Zero% Sources will not be documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as applicable to project and magnificence, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as applicable to project and magnificence, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as applicable to project and magnificence, and format is usually right. Sources are fully and appropriately documented, as applicable to project and magnificence, and format is freed from error.
Complete Weightage 100% NRS428VN Benchmark – Policy Brief Assignment
