NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper
Targets:
Clarify the function of the general public well being nurse in catastrophe administration.
Appraise methods designed for emergency and catastrophe preparedness.
Apply ranges of prevention to pure and artifical disasters.
Describe the religious concerns surrounding disasters.
Examine Supplies
Neighborhood and Public Well being: The Way forward for Well being Care
Learn Chapter 5 in Neighborhood and Public Well being: The Way forward for Well being Care.
URL:
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/community-and-public-health_the-future-of-health-care_1e.php
GCU Nursing Graduate Meets Wants of Joplin
Learn “GCU Nursing Graduate Meets Wants of Joplin,” by Carroll, from Herd on Campus (2011).
Diary of Medical Mission Journey
View “Diary of Medical Mission Journey.”
URL:
https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs427v/diary-of-medical-mission-trip/v2.1/
Neighborhood Emergency Response Crew
Learn “Neighborhood Emergency Response Crew,” situated on the Prepared (Division of Homeland Safety) web site.
URL:
https://www.prepared.gov/community-emergency-response-team#
Be Purple Cross Prepared
Learn “Be Purple Cross Prepared,” situated on the American Purple Cross web site.
URL:
https://www.redcross.org/content material/dam/redcross/Nationwide/BE%20RED%20CROSS%20READY.pdf
IS-100.C: Instruction to the Incident Command System, ICS-100
Full the “IS-100.C: Instruction to the Incident Command System, ICS-100” course on the Federal Emergency Management Company (FEMA – 2018) web site.
URL:
https://coaching.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=IS-100.b
Disaster Reduction and Restoration and Companies
Discover the Disaster Reduction and Get better Companies web page of the American Purple Cross web site.
URL:
http://www.redcross.org/get-help/disaster-relief-and-recovery-services
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Discover the Emergency Preparedness and Response web page of the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC) web site.
URL:
https://emergency.cdc.gov/
Duties
Neighborhood Educating Expertise Approval Type
Earlier than presenting your “Neighborhood Educating Plan: Neighborhood Presentation” to the group, search approval from an company administrator or consultant. Upon receiving approval from the company, submit the finished “Neighborhood Educating Expertise Approval Type.”
Attachments
NRS-428VN-RS5-CommunityTeachingExperienceForm.doc
Benchmark – Neighborhood Educating Plan: Neighborhood Presentation
The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon College meets the necessities for medical competencies as outlined by the Fee on Collegiate Nursing Schooling (CCNE) and the American Affiliation of Faculties of Nursing (AACN), utilizing nontraditional experiences for training nurses. These experiences come within the type of direct and oblique care experiences by which licensed nursing college students interact in studying inside the context of their hospital group, particular care self-discipline, and native communities.
Based mostly on the suggestions supplied by the supplier, determine the most effective strategy for educating. Put together a presentation primarily based on the Educating Work Plan and current the knowledge to your group.
Choices for Supply
Choose one of many following choices for supply and put together the relevant presentation:
PowerPoint presentation – not more than 30 minutes
Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages
Audio presentation
Poster presentation
Collection of Neighborhood Setting
These are thought of applicable group settings. Select one of many following:
Public well being clinic
Neighborhood well being middle
Lengthy-term care facility
Transitional care facility
Residence well being middle
College/Faculty well being middle
Church group
Grownup/Little one care middle
Neighborhood Educating Expertise Approval Type
Earlier than presenting info to the group, search approval from an company administrator or consultant utilizing the “Neighborhood Educating Expertise Approval Type.” Submit this way as directed within the Neighborhood Educating Expertise Approval task drop field.
Normal Necessities
Whereas APA type isn’t required for the physique of this task, strong educational writing is anticipated, and documentation of sources ought to be introduced utilizing APA formatting pointers, which may be discovered within the APA Type Information, situated within the Scholar Success Middle.
This task makes use of a rubric. Please overview the rubric previous to starting the task to change into accustomed to the expectations for profitable completion. NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper
You aren’t required to submit this task to LopesWrite.
Benchmark Info
Registered Nurse to Bachelor of Science in Nursing
The benchmark assesses the next competencies:
three.three Present individualized training to numerous affected person populations in a wide range of well being care settings.
Attachments
NRS-428VN-RS5-CommunityTeachingExperienceForm.doc
Rubric
Course Code Class Code Project Title Complete Factors
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O503 Benchmark – Neighborhood Educating Plan: Neighborhood Presentation 120.zero
Standards Share Unsatisfactory (zero.00%) Lower than Passable (65.00%) Passable (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Wonderful (100.00%) Feedback Factors Earned
Content material 80.zero%
Presentation Based mostly on Educating Work Plan and Supplier Suggestions 20.zero% Presentation isn’t primarily based on a Educating Work Plan. Presentation partially primarily based on a Educating Work Plan. Documented supplier suggestions isn’t built-in. Main elements are incomplete. Extra info is required. Presentation is usually primarily based on Educating Work Plan and any documented supplier suggestions. Some elements are unclear. There are minor inconsistencies with Educating Work Plan. Presentation relies on Educating Work Plan and any documented supplier suggestions. All elements are usually in keeping with Educating Work Plan. Presentation is clearly primarily based on Educating Work Plan and any documented supplier suggestions. All elements are in keeping with Educating Work Plan.
Presentation Based mostly on Educating Work Plan and Supplier Suggestions Presentation Gives Individualized Schooling to Various Affected person Inhabitants in Applicable Neighborhood Setting (C3.three) 20.zero% Presentation doesn’t embody individualized training to a various affected person inhabitants in an applicable group setting. Presentation is incomplete. Important info for the recognized inhabitants is omitted or unclear. Some numerous attributes for that inhabitants are introduced; not all attributes are related to the inhabitants. The presentation doesn’t appear applicable for the well being care setting. There are main inaccuracies. Extra info is required. Presentation gives common info for the recognized inhabitants. Some numerous attributes for that inhabitants are introduced. Presentation is suitable to the group setting chosen. At the very least one well being care setting the place this particular person training plan may very well be used has been proposed. There are some inaccuracies. Minor element or rationale is required for help. Presentation gives info for the recognized inhabitants and contains many numerous attributes for that inhabitants. Presentation is pertinent to the group setting chosen. Some further well being care settings the place this particular person training plan may very well be used are proposed. Some element is required for readability. Presentation gives particular info that focuses on the recognized inhabitants and contains all numerous attributes for that inhabitants. Presentation is very related to the group setting chosen. Further well being care settings the place this particular person training plan may very well be used are recognized and extremely related. The presentation demonstrates perception into offering particular person training to numerous affected person populations.
Presentation of Content material 40.zero% The content material lacks a transparent standpoint and logical sequence of data. Consists of little persuasive info. Sequencing of concepts is unclear. The content material is imprecise in conveying a standpoint and doesn’t create a powerful sense of objective. Consists of some persuasive info. NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper The presentation slides are usually competent, however concepts could present some inconsistency in group and/or of their relationships to one another. The content material is written with a logical development of concepts and supporting info exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Consists of persuasive info from dependable sources. The content material is written clearly and concisely. Concepts universally progress and relate to one another. The undertaking contains motivating questions and superior organizers. The undertaking offers the viewers a transparent sense of the principle concept.
Group, Effectiveness, and Format 20.zero%
Structure 5.zero% The format is cluttered, complicated, and doesn’t use spacing, headings, and subheadings to reinforce the readability. The textual content is extraordinarily troublesome to learn with lengthy blocks of textual content, small level dimension for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colours. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or daring formatting is clear. The format reveals some construction, however seems cluttered and busy or distracting with massive gaps of white area or a distracting background. General readability is troublesome because of prolonged paragraphs, too many various fonts, darkish or busy background, overuse of daring, or lack of applicable indentations of textual content. The format makes use of horizontal and vertical white area appropriately. Typically the fonts are straightforward to learn, however in a couple of locations using fonts, italics, daring, lengthy paragraphs, coloration, or busy background detracts and doesn’t improve readability. The format background and textual content complement one another and allow the content material to be simply learn. The fonts are straightforward to learn and level dimension varies appropriately for headings and textual content. The format is visually pleasing and contributes to the general message with applicable use of headings, subheadings, and white area. Textual content is suitable in size for the audience and to the purpose. The background and colours improve the readability of the textual content.
Language Use and Viewers Consciousness (contains sentence development, phrase alternative, and so forth.) 5.zero% Inappropriate phrase alternative and lack of selection in language use are evident. Author seems to be unaware of viewers. Use of primer prose signifies author both doesn’t apply figures of speech or makes use of them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language alternative (register) or phrase alternative are current. The author reveals some lack of management in utilizing figures of speech appropriately. Language is suitable to the focused viewers for probably the most half. The author is clearly conscious of viewers, makes use of a wide range of applicable vocabulary for the focused viewers, and makes use of figures of speech to speak clearly. The author makes use of a wide range of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and phrase alternative in distinctive and inventive methods which are applicable to objective, self-discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.zero% Slide errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of which means. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they don’t seem to be overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely freed from mechanical errors, though a couple of could also be current. Author is clearly answerable for customary, written, educational English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and so forth., as applicable to task and type) 5.zero% Sources aren’t documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as applicable to task and type, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as applicable to task and type, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as applicable to task and type, and format is usually appropriate. Sources are utterly and appropriately documented, as applicable to task and type, and format is freed from error.
Complete Weightage 100%
.
Neighborhood Educating Plan: Educating Expertise Paper
The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon College meets the necessities for medical competencies as outlined by the Fee on Collegiate Nursing Schooling (CCNE) and the American Affiliation of Faculties of Nursing (AACN), utilizing nontraditional experiences for training nurses. These experiences come within the type of direct and oblique care experiences by which licensed nursing college students interact in studying inside the context of their hospital group, particular care self-discipline, and native communities. NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper
Be aware: That is a person task. In 1,500-2,00zero phrases, describe the educating expertise and focus on your observations. The written portion of this task ought to embody:
Abstract of educating plan
Epidemiological rationale for subject
Analysis of educating expertise
Neighborhood response to educating
Areas of strengths and areas of enchancment
Put together this task in line with the APA pointers discovered within the APA Type Information, situated within the Scholar Success Middle.
This task makes use of a rubric. Please overview the rubric previous to starting the task to change into accustomed to the expectations for profitable completion.
You might be required to submit this task to LopesWrite. A hyperlink to the LopesWrite technical help articles is situated in Course Supplies in case you want help.
Rubric
Course Code Class Code Project Title Complete Factors
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-O503 Neighborhood Educating Plan: Educating Expertise Paper 100.zero
Standards Share Unsatisfactory (zero.00%) Much less Than Passable (65.00%) Passable (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Wonderful (100.00%) Feedback Factors Earned
Content material 80.zero%
Complete Abstract of Educating Plan 15.zero% Abstract of group educating plan is omitted. NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper Abstract of group educating plan is incomplete. General, the educating plan is unclear. Abstract of group educating plan is obtainable, however some parts are imprecise. Some rationale or proof is required for readability and help. Neighborhood educating plan is obvious with an in depth abstract of every part. Minor rationale is required for readability or help. Focus of group educating is obvious, in keeping with group educating plan, detailed, and effectively supported. The presentation demonstrates a capability to create efficient educating plans relative to a inhabitants.
Epidemiological Rationale for Topic 15.zero% Epidemiological rationale for the subject is omitted. Epidemiological rationale is unclear or incorrect. Epidemiological rationale is summarized and gives some help for the subject. Extra info or proof is required for help. Epidemiological rationale is supplied and gives common help for the subject. Some element is required for readability. Robust epidemiological rationale is supplied and demonstrates help for the subject introduced.
Analysis of Educating Expertise 20.zero% Analysis of educating expertise is omitted or incomplete. Analysis of educating expertise is unclear or underdeveloped. The narrative isn’t written in a fashion that evaluates the expertise. Analysis of educating expertise is summarized. Some elements are imprecise. Extra element is required to completely illustrate an Assessment of the expertise. Analysis of the educating expertise is usually introduced. Some element is required for readability. A complete analysis of educating expertise is introduced. Perception into self-appraisal in regard to educating is demonstrated.
Neighborhood Response to Educating Offered 15.zero% Neighborhood response to educating is omitted. Neighborhood response to educating is partially summarized. Extra info is required. A abstract of the group response to educating is introduced. Some areas are unclear. Extra info is required for help or readability. An outline of group response to educating is usually introduced. Some info is required for help or readability. An in depth description of group response to educating is introduced.
Areas of Energy and Enchancment 15.zero% Areas of energy and enchancment are omitted. Areas of energy and enchancment are partially mentioned. Areas of energy and enchancment are usually mentioned. Areas of energy and enchancment are mentioned. Areas of energy and enchancment are completely mentioned. The creator demonstrates perception into private strengths and areas the place enchancment can be useful.
Group, Effectiveness, and Format 20.zero%
Thesis Improvement and Objective 5.zero% Paper lacks any discernible total objective or organizing declare. Thesis is insufficiently developed or imprecise. Objective isn’t clear. Thesis is obvious and applicable to objective. Thesis is obvious and forecasts the event of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and applicable to the aim. Thesis is complete and incorporates the essence of the paper. Thesis assertion makes the aim of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Building 5.zero% Assertion of objective isn’t justified by the conclusion. The conclusion doesn’t help the declare made. Argument is incoherent and makes use of noncredible sources. Adequate justification of claims is missing. Argument lacks constant unity. There are apparent flaws within the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly however could have a couple of inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, however not completely, helps the aim. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument reveals logical development. Strategies of argumentation are evident. There’s a easy development of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive declare in a particular and compelling method. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (contains spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.zero% Floor errors are pervasive sufficient that they impede communication of which means. Inappropriate phrase alternative or sentence development is used. NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language alternative (register) or phrase alternative are current. Sentence construction is appropriate however not diversified. Some mechanical errors or typos are current, however they don’t seem to be overly distracting to the reader. Appropriate and diversified sentence construction and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is basically freed from mechanical errors, though a couple of could also be current. The author makes use of a wide range of efficient sentence constructions and figures of speech. Author is clearly in control of customary, written, educational English.
Paper Format (use of applicable type for the most important and task) 2.zero% Template isn’t used appropriately, or documentation format isn’t adopted appropriately. Applicable template is used, however some parts are lacking or mistaken. An absence of management with formatting is obvious. Applicable template is used. Formatting is appropriate, though some minor errors could also be current. Applicable template is totally used. There are nearly no errors in formatting type. All format parts are appropriate.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, and so forth., as applicable to task and type) three.zero% Sources aren’t documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as applicable to task and type, with quite a few formatting errors. Sources are documented, as applicable to task and type, though some formatting errors could also be current. Sources are documented, as applicable to task and type, and format is usually appropriate. Sources are utterly and appropriately documented, as applicable to task and type, and format is freed from error.
Complete Weightage 100%
Scientific Apply Hours – Educating Mission
Full and submit the “Scientific Apply Hours: Educating Mission” Type as indicated to doc your medical expertise.
With a view to obtain a passing grade within the course, college students are required to have met the required variety of medical apply hours.
Attachments
NRS-428VN-RS5-ClinicalPracticeHours-Educating Mission.docx
Topic 5 DQ 1
What religious concerns surrounding a catastrophe can come up for people, communities, and well being care suppliers? Clarify your reply within the context of a pure or artifical catastrophe. How can a group well being nurse help within the religious care of the person, group, self, and colleagues? NRS428VN Topic 5: Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Management Paper
Topic 5 DQ 2
Watch the “Diary of Medical Mission Journey” movies coping with the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti in 2010. Mirror on this pure catastrophe by answering the next questions:
Suggest one instance of a nursing intervention associated to the catastrophe from every of the next ranges: major prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention. Present progressive examples that haven’t been mentioned by earlier college students.
Underneath which part of the catastrophe do the three proposed interventions fall? Clarify why you selected that part.
With what folks or companies would you’re employed in facilitating the proposed interventions and why?
