Studying Sources
Required Readings
Chapter four, “What Is (and Is Not) a Psychological Dysfunction” (pp. 54–69)
Required Media
Accessible participant –Downloads–Obtain Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload TranscriptLaureate Training (Producer). (2018a). Psychopathology and prognosis for social work observe podcast: Analysis, self-stigma, and psychological well being [Audio podcast]. Baltimore, MD: Creator.
Elective Sources
Document: Suggested Further Reading for SOCW 6090 (PDF)
Note: Throughout the course, you may take the opportunity to read more about many of the topics covered. This document has a list of suggested further readings organized by course week. This same document will be linked in each week.
Project: Analysis: The Burden of Stigma in Help In search of
The specter of public stigma, in addition to self-stigma, can stop people from receiving the psychological well being remedy they want. On this Project, you analyze the affect of stigma on experiences with and remedy of psychological sickness.
To organize: Watch the TED Speak by Sangu Delle after which assessment the readings for this week. Give attention to Delle’s examples illustrating Corrigan’s mannequin concerning the levels of stigma and the hierarchy of disclosure. Contemplate Delle’s expertise in opposition to that mannequin.
By Day 7
Submit a Three-page paper that addresses the next:
- Briefly clarify Corrigan’s mannequin of the levels of stigma and his suggestions and hierarchy about restoration.
- Clarify whether or not Delle’s expertise follows that mannequin. Use particular examples to argue your perspective. Should you agree, determine which stage of restoration Delle is in.
- Analyze Delle’s studies about his personal experiences with each kinds of stigma. Present particular examples, and in your Assessment contemplate the next questions:
- Does one kind of stigma predominate in his speak?
- Which of Delle’s private values or beliefs have been challenged by his internalizations about his personal sickness and help-seeking?
- What strengths does he exhibit?
- What was the first good thing about his prognosis?
- Do you assume his expertise can be completely different if his tradition was completely different? Clarify why or why not?