NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
Capstone Evidence-based Paper Tips PURPOSE On this closing project of the Capstone course, the scholar will use abilities of inquiry gained within the baccalaureate nursing program to determine a scientific problem upon which nurses have the power to resolve or have a optimistic impression. With a deal with the variety of the person in addition to the variation of cultural values of a selected inhabitants, the scholar will develop a plan for addressing the scientific problem. With the incorporation of different disciplines from the well being care group the scholar will describe the position the nurse has within the implementation of an ethically sound plan.
COURSE OUTCOMES This project permits the scholar to fulfill the next course outcomes.
CO # 1: Synthesize information from sciences, humanities, and nursing in managing the wants of people as customers of healthcare in a patient-centered surroundings. (PO#1)
CO # 2: Combine communication and relationship abilities in teamwork and collaboration functioning successfully with well being group members and customers of care. (PO#Three)
CO # Three: Make the most of info know-how to handle information, mitigate error, and help choice making with well being group members and customers of care. (PO# Eight)
CO # four Combine important considering, scientific reasoning abilities, greatest present proof, scientific experience, and affected person/household preferences/values within the implementation of the nursing course of. (PO# four)
CO # 5: Discover the impression requirements, legislative points, moral rules, and values on skilled nursing, utilizing information to observe outcomes and enhance high quality and security. (PO# 5, 6)
DUE DATE Except in any other case instructed by the college, this project is because of be submitted within the course drop field no later the 12 am (midnight) on the Sunday on the finish of Unit 6. The Faculty’s Late Task Coverage applies to this exercise.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE 200 factors
REQUIREMENTS • When choosing a scientific problem to be addressed within the project, the scholar is anticipated to
draw from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint: assurance of a secure and efficient care surroundings, well being promotion and upkeep of well being, the
preservation of the affected person’s psychosocial integrity and physiological integrity.
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 1
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 2
• Size of paper Eight-10 pages excluding the title web page and the reference web page. • The sources cited each in textual content and on the reference web page for this project shall be formatted
in accordance APA pointers. • A minimal of six (6) peer-reviewed scholarly sources are required in help of the Proof-
primarily based Capstone Evidence-based Paper. • This project shall be graded utilizing the Capstone Proof- primarily based Paper Rubric out there in Unit 6
of the course.
PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT The scholar shall be required to:
Produce an Eight-10 web page evidence-based paper addressing a major scientific problem Determine and discover an answer to a scientific problem Collect extra background info on:
o the scientific problem o the affected person inhabitants
Develop a plan that could possibly be carried out by a nurse to resolve the scientific problem. Replicate on the information and expertise gained within the nursing program Draw from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint
o assurance of a secure and efficient care surroundings, o well being promotion and upkeep of well being, o preservation of the affected person’s psychosocial o preservation of the affected person’s physiological integrity
Apart from the Introduction, every criterion listed beneath will function the foremost headings of this project due in Unit Six and can embrace the next:
• Title Web page: (APA formatting) • Introduction:
• Provides an in depth description of the assertion of function for the paper. • Identifies a scientific problem or downside drawn from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN
examination blueprint: o Assurance of a secure and efficient care surroundings o Well being promotion and upkeep of well being o Preservation of the affected person inhabitants’s psychosocial integrity o Preservation of the affected person inhabitants ’s physiological integrity
• On this paper the scholar will present an in depth description of the connection between the class from the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint and the scientific problem.
• The reference to the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint discovered on the Nationwide Council of State Boards of Nursing web site constitutes one scholarly reference.
• Significance: The scholar will describe the significance of the scientific problem to the well being of a affected person inhabitants. This dialogue will embrace the potential adverse impact of leaving the scientific problem unresolved.
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK Three
Affected person Inhabitants: The scholar will describe the affected person inhabitants that’s impacted by the scientific problem. With a deal with the variety of the human situation discovered inside this affected person inhabitants, the scholar will describe the affect that cultural values could have on the proposed resolution.
Proposed Answer: The scholar will set the stage for proposing one of the best resolution to the scientific downside by utilizing acceptable evidence-based information and integrating information from peer-reviewed journal articles. On this paper, the scholar will:
i. Suggest a transparent resolution to the scientific downside that’s supported by a minimal of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
ii. Increase on the moral concerns when growing the plan. Targets: Whereas the intervention won’t really be carried out, the scholar will talk about the plan that might
be carried out by a nurse to deal with the scientific problem. One short-term and one long-term objective of the intervention shall be recognized. The scholar will embrace an outline of how attainment of every of the targets could be measured.
Limitations: The scholar will determine a minimal of two potential obstacles to the success of the plan in addition to a method for addressing each.
Advantages: The scholar will describe a minimal of 1 profit to the affected person inhabitants and one profit to the nursing occupation that may outcome from finishing up the plan. Gives a minimal of 1 scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the advantage of the plan to the affected person inhabitants.
Individuals and Interdisciplinary Strategy: The scholar will determine the entire events whose participation is necessary for the success of implementing the plan.
i. This listing will embrace a minimal of two members of disciplines exterior of nursing. ii. An outline of the advantage of together with every member from one other self-discipline to the success
of the plan. iii. A minimal of 1 scholarly, peer-reviewed supply offering help for the success of the
plan by together with the healthcare group member exterior of nursing. • Conclusion:
i. Gives a radical recap of the aim of the plan to forestall or Help to resolve the scientific problem.
ii. Features a full assertion describing why addressing this scientific downside issues and to whom.
• Reference Web page: (APA formatting)
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK four
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Task Standards
Factors % Description
Introduction 20 10% Introduces a scientific downside drawn from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint:
Assurance of a secure and efficient care surroundings. Well being promotion and upkeep of well being. Preservation of the affected person’s psychosocial integrity. Preservation of the affected person’s physiological integrity.
This reference appropriately cites the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint discovered on the Nationwide Council of State Boards of Nursing web site and constitutes one scholarly reference.
Significance 20 10% Describes the significance of the scientific downside to the well being of the affected person inhabitants.
Contains the potential adverse impact of leaving the scientific problem unresolved.
Affected person Inhabitants
20 10% Summarizes the variety of the human situation discovered inside the affected person inhabitants.
Identifies the affect that cultural values could have on the plan for addressing the scientific problem.
Proposed Answer
20 10% Proposes a transparent resolution to the scientific downside that’s supported by a minimal of three scholarly, peer-reviewed sources.
Expands on the moral concerns in growing the plan for addressing the difficulty affecting affected person inhabitants.
Targets 20 10% Develops a minimal of 1 short-term objective. Develops a minimal of 1 long-term objective. Contains the methods wherein attainment of every of the targets
will to be measured. Limitations 20 10% Identifies a minimal of two anticipated obstacles to the
success of stopping or resolving the scientific problem. Describes a minimum of one technique for addressing every
anticipated barrier. Advantages 20 10% Describes a minimal of 1 profit to the affected person
inhabitants and one profit to the nursing occupation that may outcome from stopping or resolving the scientific problem.
Gives a minimal of 1 scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the advantage of the plan to the affected person inhabitants.
Individuals and Interdisciplinary Strategy
20 10% Identifies the entire events who shall be concerned within the implementation of the scientific challenge.
This listing features a minimal of two members of a self-discipline exterior of nursing.
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 5
Contains the advantage of together with every member from one other self-discipline to the success of the challenge.
Gives a minimal of 1 scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the success of the plan by together with the healthcare group member exterior of nursing.
Conclusion 20 10% Gives a radical recap of the aim of the plan to forestall or Help to resolve the scientific problem.
Features a full assertion describing why addressing the scientific downside issues and to whom
APA Format, Grammar and Punctuation
20 10% • Makes use of clear and proper grammar. • Makes use of correct sentence construction and stream. • Adheres to all APA formatting pointers for title web page,
margins, and in-text citations.
Whole Factors = 200 Factors Earned = _____
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 6
GRADING RUBRIC
Task Standards
Excellent or Highest Stage of Efficiency
A (92–100%)
Very Good or Excessive Stage of Efficiency
B (84–91%)
Competent or Passable Stage of Efficiency
C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Stage of
Efficiency F (Zero–75%)
Introduction (20 factors)
Fully units the stage for choosing the scientific problem by way of the impression on the well being of a affected person inhabitants. Provides an in depth description of the assertion of function for the paper whereas introducing a scientific downside drawn from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint which is appropriately cited.
19-20 factors
Partially units the stage for choosing the scientific problem by way of the impression on the well being of a affected person inhabitants. Identifies most however not the entire particulars describing the assertion of function for the paper whereas introducing a scientific downside drawn from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint which is appropriately cited.
17-18 factors
Minimally addresses the scientific problem by way of the impression on the well being of a affected person inhabitants. Describes generally phrases the assertion of function for the paper however doesn’t introduce a scientific downside drawn from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint.
16 factors
Gives an outline of the aim of the paper however doesn’t deal with the scientific problem by way of the impression on the well being of a affected person inhabitants. Doesn’t introduce a scientific downside drawn from one of many 4 essential classes of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint
Zero-15 factors
Significance (20 factors)
Fully describes the significance of the scientific downside to the well being of the affected person inhabitants and consists of the potential adverse impact of leaving the scientific problem unresolved.
19-20 factors
Partially describes the significance of the scientific downside to the well being of the affected person inhabitants with partial inclusion of the potential adverse impact of leaving the scientific problem unresolved.
17-18 factors
Minimally describes the significance of the scientific downside to the well being of the affected person inhabitants with minimal inclusion of the potential adverse impact of leaving the scientific problem unresolved.
16 factors
Gives minimal or no description of the significance of the scientific downside to the well being of the affected person inhabitants and/or the potential adverse impact of leaving the scientific problem unresolved.
Zero-15 factors
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 7
Affected person Inhabitants (20 factors)
Clearly summarizes the variety of the human situation discovered inside the affected person inhabitants. Fully identifies the affect that cultural values could have on the plan for addressing the scientific problem within the affected person inhabitants. Gives an expanded view of the moral concerns of the affected person inhabitants.
19-20 factors
Partially summarizes the variety of the human situation discovered inside the affected person inhabitants. Gives restricted identification of the affect that cultural values could have on the plan for addressing the scientific problem within the affected person inhabitants. Presents an incomplete view of the moral concerns of the affected person inhabitants.
17-18 factors
Minimally summarizes the variety of the human situation discovered inside the affected person inhabitants. Gives marginal identification of the affect that cultural values could have on the plan for addressing the scientific problem within the affected person inhabitants. Presents an insufficient view of the moral concerns of the affected person inhabitants.
16 factors
Abstract of the variety of the human situation discovered inside the affected person inhabitants lacking. Identification of the affect that cultural values could have on the plan for addressing the scientific problem within the affected person inhabitants Identification of affected person inhabitants lacking utterly or missing in description.
Zero-15 factors
Proposed Answer (20 factors)
Proposes a transparent resolution to the scientific downside that encompasses pertinent moral concerns within the growth of the plan. Appropriately supported by a minimal of three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
19-20 factors
Proposes an answer to the scientific downside that gives minimal reference to the moral concerns of growing the plan. Appropriately supported by two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
17-18 factors
Makes an attempt to suggest an answer to the scientific downside that doesn’t present reference to the moral concerns of growing the plan. Appropriately supported by one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article.
16 factors
Makes reference to an answer to the scientific downside irrespective of the moral concerns of growing the plan and isn’t appropriately supported by scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
Zero-15 factors
Targets (20 factors)
Develops a number of short- time period objective and a number of long-term objective. Features a full description of the methods wherein attainment of every of the targets shall be measured.
19-20 factors
Gives a partial description of 1 short-term objective and one long-term objective. Features a partial description of the methods wherein attainment of every of the targets shall be measured.
17-18 factors
Gives a minimal description of 1 short-term objective and one long-term objective. Features a restricted description of the methods wherein attainment of every of the targets shall be measured.
16 factors
Makes reference to a short- time period objective and a minimum of one long-term objective however neglects to supply an outline of the methods wherein attainment of every of the targets shall be measured.
Zero-15 factors
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK Eight
Limitations (20 factors)
Fully describes minimal of two anticipated obstacles to the success of the implementation of the scientific challenge and plans for addressing them.
19-20 factors
Partially describes one anticipated barrier to the success of the implementation of the scientific challenge and plans for addressing similar.
17-18 factors
Gives a minimal description of anticipated obstacles to the success of the implementation of the scientific challenge and minimal or lacking plans for addressing them.
16 factors
Little or no reference to the anticipated obstacles to the success of the implementation of the scientific challenge and plans for addressing them.
Zero-15 factors
Advantages (20 factors)
Gives a radical description of a minimal of 1 profit to the affected person inhabitants and a number of profit to the nursing occupation that may outcome from finishing up the scientific challenge. Gives a number of scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the advantage of the plan to the affected person inhabitants.
19-20 factors
Gives a partial overview of 1 profit to the affected person inhabitants and one profit to the nursing occupation that may outcome from finishing up the scientific challenge. Gives one scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the advantage of the plan to the affected person inhabitants.
17-18 factors
Gives a minimal overview of profit to the affected person inhabitants and profit to the nursing occupation that may outcome from finishing up the scientific challenge. Gives one reference for help of the advantage of the plan to the affected person inhabitants.
16 factors
Fails to supply an outline of profit to the affected person inhabitants and to the nursing occupation that may outcome from finishing up the scientific challenge. Doesn’t present a reference in help of the advantage of the plan to the affected person inhabitants.
Zero-15 factors
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 9
Individuals and Interdisciplinary Strategy (20 factors)
Gives full particulars figuring out the entire events who shall be concerned within the implementation of the scientific challenge. This listing consists of two or extra members of a self-discipline exterior of nursing. Gives a whole description of the advantage of together with every member from a self-discipline exterior of nursing to the success of the challenge. Gives a a number of scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the success of the plan by together with the healthcare group member exterior of nursing.
19-20 factors
Gives partial particulars figuring out the entire events who shall be concerned within the implementation of the scientific challenge. This listing consists of a minimum of one member of a self-discipline exterior of nursing. Gives a partial description of the advantage of together with every member from a self-discipline exterior of nursing to the success of the challenge. Gives a minimal of 1 scholarly, peer-reviewed supply in help of the success of the plan by together with the healthcare group member exterior of nursing.
17-18 factors
Minimally particulars the events who shall be concerned within the implementation of the scientific challenge. Could or could not embrace a member of a self-discipline exterior of nursing. Gives a minimal description of the advantage of together with every member from a self-discipline exterior of nursing to the success of the challenge. Gives one reference in help of the success of the plan by together with the healthcare group member exterior of nursing.
16 factors
Minimal or lacking particulars of the events who shall be concerned within the implementation of the scientific challenge. Doesn’t embrace a member of a self-discipline exterior of nursing. Lacking an outline of the advantage of together with members from a self-discipline exterior of nursing to the success of the challenge. Doesn’t present a reference in help of the success of the plan by together with the healthcare group member exterior of nursing.
Zero-15 factors
Conclusion (20 factors)
Gives a radical recap of the aim of the plan to forestall or Help to resolve the scientific problem together with a whole assertion describing why addressing this scientific downside issues and to whom.
19-20 factors
Gives a partial recap of the aim of plan to forestall or Help to resolve the scientific problem together with a partial assertion describing why addressing this scientific downside issues and to whom.
17-18 factors
Partially offers a minimal recap of the plan to forestall or Help to resolve the scientific problem together with a minimal assertion describing why addressing this scientific downside issues and to whom.
16 factors
Minimal or lacking recap of the plan to forestall or Help to resolve the scientific problem missing a press release describing why addressing this scientific downside issues and to whom.
Zero-15 factors
NR452 CAPSTONE COURSE
NR452 Evidence-based Mission Tips V4.docx Revised Could2020 SRK 10
APA Format, Grammar and Punctuation (20 factors)
APA format is used precisely and persistently within the paper, on the title web page, in-text citations, and/or the Reference web page. No errors in grammar or punctuation.
19-20 factors
APA formatting is used with1-2 errors, on the title web page, in-text citations, and/or the Reference web page. Lower than 2 errors in grammar or punctuation.
17-18 factors
Not more than Three-5 errors in APA formatting within the paper, on the title web page, in-text citations, and the Reference web page. Not more than Three-5 errors in grammar or punctuation.
16 factors
Greater than 5 errors in APA formatting within the paper, on the title web page, in-text citations, and/or the Reference web page. Greater than 5 errors in grammar or punctuation.
Zero-15 factors
Whole Factors Doable = 200 factors
