NR320-326 Mental Health Nursing
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
Required Uniform Project: Scholarly Article Assessment
PURPOSE The coed will Assessment, summarize, and critique a scholarly article associated to a psychological well being matter.
COURSE OUTCOMES This task allows the scholar to satisfy the next course outcomes.
• CO four. Make the most of important considering abilities in scientific decision-making and implementation of the nursing course of for psychiatric/psychological well being shoppers.
(PO four)
• CO 5: Make the most of out there assets to satisfy self‐recognized objectives for private, skilled, and academic improvement acceptable to the psychological
well being setting. (PO 5)
• CO 7: Look at ethical, moral, authorized, and professional requirements and rules as a foundation for scientific determination‐making. (PO 6)
• CO 9: Make the most of analysis findings as a foundation for the event of a bunch management expertise. (PO eight)
DUE DATE Consult with Course Calendar for particulars. The Late Project Coverage applies to this task.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 100 factors
REQUIREMENTS 1. Choose a scholarly nursing or analysis article (revealed throughout the final 5 years) associated to psychological well being nursing, which incorporates content material associated
to proof‐based mostly follow.
*** You could want to guage a number of articles earlier than you discover one that’s acceptable. ***
2. Be sure that no different member of your scientific group chooses the identical article. Submit the article for approval.
three. Write a 2–three web page paper (excluding the title and reference pages) utilizing the next standards.
a. Write a short introduction of the subject and clarify why you will need to psychological well being nursing.
NR326 Mental Health Nursing
NR320-326 Mental Health Nursing
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
b. Cite statistics to help the importance of the subject.
c. Summarize the article; embody key factors or findings of the article.
d. Focus on how you could possibly use the knowledge to your follow; give particular examples.
e. Establish strengths and weaknesses of the article.
f. Focus on whether or not you’ll advocate the article to different colleagues.
g. Write a conclusion.
four. Paper should observe APA format. Embody a title web page and a reference web page; use 12‐level Instances Roman font; and embody in‐textual content citations (use citations
at any time when paraphrasing, utilizing statistics, or quoting from the article). Please discuss with your APA Handbook as a information for in‐textual content citations and pattern reference pages.
5. Submit per college directions by due date (see Course Calendar); please discuss with your APA Handbook as a information for in‐textual content citations and pattern
reference pages. Copies of articles from any Databases, whether or not PDF, MSWord, or every other digital file format, can’t be despatched through the Studying
Administration System (Canvas) dropbox or by way of e mail, as this violates copyright regulation protections outlined in our subscription agreements. Consult with the “Coverage” web page underneath the Useful resource tab within the shell for the instructions for correctly accessing and sending library articles electronically utilizing permalinks.
NR320-326 Mental Health Nursing
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Project
Standards
Factors % Description
Introduction 10 10 • An efficient introduction establishes the aim of the paper.
• The introduction ought to seize the eye of the reader.
Article abstract 30 30 Abstract of article should embody the next.
• Statistics to help the importance of the subject
• Key factors and findings of the article
• Dialogue of how info from the article could possibly be utilized in your follow (give
particular examples)
Article critique 30 30 Article critique should embody the next.
• Strengths and weaknesses of the article
• Dialogue of whether or not you’ll advocate the article to a colleague
Conclusion 15 15 The conclusion assertion must be effectively outlined and clearly said. An efficient conclusion gives Assessment and/or synthesis of knowledge, which pertains to the principle
thought/matter of the paper. The conclusion is supported by concepts offered all through the
physique of your report.
Article Choice &
Approval 5 5 • Article is related to psychological well being nursing follow and is present (inside 5 years of
publication).
• No duplicate articles throughout the scientific group.
• Article submitted and authorised as scholarly by teacher.
Grammar/Spelling/ Mechanics/APA
format
10 10 • Appropriate use of Normal English grammar and sentence construction
• No spelling or typographical errors
• Doc consists of title and reference pages
• Citations within the textual content and reference web page
Whole 100 100
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
GRADING RUBRIC
Project
Standards
Excellent or Highest
Stage of Efficiency
A (92–100%)
Very Good or Excessive Stage of
Efficiency
B (84–91%)
Competent or Passable
Stage of Efficiency
C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or
Unsatisfactory Stage of
Efficiency
F (Zero–75%)
Introduction (10
factors) • Introduction is current and
distinctly establishes the aim of paper
• Introduction is interesting and promptly captures the eye of the reader
10 factors
• Introduction is current and customarily establishes the aim of paper
• Introduction has attraction and customarily captures the eye of the reader
9 factors
Introduction is current and customarily establishes the aim of paper
eight factors
No introduction
Zero‐7 factors
Article abstract (30
factors) • Statistics offered strongly
help the importance of the subject
• Key factors and findings of the article are clearly said
• Completely discusses how info from the article could possibly be utilized in your follow by giving two or extra particular, related examples
28‐30 factors
• Statistics offered reasonably help the importance of the subject
• Key factors and findings of the article are vaguely said
• Adequately discusses how info from the article could possibly be utilized in your follow by giving two or extra particular, related examples
26‐27 factors
• Statistics offered weakly help the importance of the subject
• Key factors and findings of the article are said in a way that’s complicated or obscure.
• Briefly discusses how info from the article could possibly be utilized in your follow by giving examples that aren’t particular, but are related
23‐25 factors
• Statistics offered don’t help the importance of the subject OR no statistics are offered.
• Key factors and findings of the article are incorrectly offered OR lacking
• Briefly discusses how info from the article could possibly be utilized in your follow by giving examples which can be neither particular, nor related OR implications to follow not mentioned
Zero‐22 factors
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
Article critique (30
factors) • The strengths and weaknesses
are effectively‐outlined and clearly said.
• Gives an intensive Assessment of whether or not or not they advocate the article
28-30 factors
• The strengths and weaknesses are sufficient and clearly said.
• Gives a normal Assessment of whether or not or not they might advocate the article
26-27 factors
• The strengths and weaknesses are transient and clearly said.
• Gives a short Assessment of
whether or not or not they might
advocate the article.
23-25 factors
• The strengths and weaknesses are unclear or not said.
• Gives an unclear or no perception as as to if or not they might advocate the article.
Zero-22 factors
.
Project
Standards
Excellent or Highest
Stage of Efficiency
A (92–100%)
Very Good or Excessive Stage of
Efficiency
B (84–91%)
Competent or Passable
Stage of Efficiency
C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or
Unsatisfactory Stage of
Efficiency
F (Zero–75%)
Conclusion (15
factors) • The conclusion assertion is
effectively‐outlined and clearly said.
• Conclusion demonstrates complete Assessment or synthesis of knowledge from the article.
• The conclusion is strongly supported by concepts offered all through the physique of the paper.
15 factors
• The conclusion assertion is normal and clearly said.
• Conclusion demonstrates complete Assessment or synthesis of knowledge from the article.
• The conclusion is strongly supported by concepts offered all through the physique of the paper.
13-14 factors
• The conclusion assertion is normal and clearly said.
• Conclusion demonstrates sufficient Assessment or synthesis of knowledge from the article.
• The conclusion is sufficiently supported by concepts offered all through the physique of the paper.
12 factors
• The conclusion assertion is imprecise or not said.
• Conclusion demonstrates insufficient Assessment or synthesis of knowledge from the article.
• The conclusion is inadequately supported by concepts offered all through the physique of the paper.
Zero‐11 factors
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
Article Choice & Approval (5 factors)
ALL Objects MET
• Article is related to psychological well being nursing follow and is present (inside 5 years of publication).
• No duplicate articles throughout the scientific group.
• Article submitted and authorised as scholarly by teacher.
5 factors
ONE merchandise NOT MET
• Article is related to psychological well being nursing follow and is present (inside 5 years of publication).
• No duplicate articles throughout the scientific group.
• Article submitted and authorised as scholarly by teacher.
four factors
2 or extra gadgets NOT MET • Article is related to psychological
well being nursing follow and is present (inside 5 years of publication).
• No duplicate articles throughout the scientific group.
• Article submitted and authorised as scholarly by teacher.
Zero‐three factors
Project
Standards
Excellent or Highest
Stage of Efficiency
A (92–100%)
Very Good or Excessive Stage of
Efficiency
B (84–91%)
Competent or Passable
Stage of Efficiency
C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or
Unsatisfactory Stage of
Efficiency F
(Zero–75%)
Grammar/Spelling/ Mechanics/APA Format (10 factors)
• References are submitted with task.
• Used acceptable APA format and are freed from errors.
• Contains title and reference
pages.
• Grammar and mechanics are freed from errors.
10 factors
• References are submitted with task.
• Used acceptable APA format and has one kind of error.
• Contains title and reference
pages.
• Grammar and mechanics have one kind of error.
9 factors
• References are submitted with task.
• Used acceptable APA format and has two varieties of errors.
• Contains title and reference
pages.
• Grammar and mechanics have two varieties of errors.
eight factors
• No references submitted with task.
• Makes an attempt to make use of acceptable APA format and has three or extra varieties of errors.
• Contains title and reference pages.
• Grammar and mechanics have three or extra varieties of errors.
Zero‐7 factors
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
Whole Factors Potential = 100 factors
COURSE OUTCOMES
DUE DATE
REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
GRADING RUBRIC
——
Mental Health Nursing (NR320-326)
NR320-326 RUA Scholarly Article Assessment V2 11/06/2018 CS/el
Required Uniform Project: Scholarly Article Assessment
PURPOSE The coed will Assessment, summarize, and critique a scholarly article associated to a psychological well being matter.
COURSE OUTCOMES This task allows the scholar to satisfy the next course outcomes.
• CO four. Make the most of important considering abilities in scientific decision-making and implementation of the nursing course of for psychiatric/psychological well being shoppers.
(PO four)
• CO 5: Make the most of out there assets to satisfy self‐recognized objectives for private, skilled, and academic improvement acceptable to the psychological
well being setting. (PO 5)
• CO 7: Look at ethical, moral, authorized, and professional requirements and rules as a foundation for scientific determination‐making. (PO 6)
• CO 9: Make the most of analysis findings as a foundation for the event of a bunch
