NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Assessment 2 Instructions: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Develop a 2-4-page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care settings.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health Determining the Credibility of Evidence activity prior to developing the report. The activity is a media simulation that offers an opportunity to review a scenario and work on determining the credibility of presented evidence. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 2 successfully. This media simulation is one potential source of context on which to base your assessment submission. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
Explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Scenario
For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis for researching and completing this assessment:
The specific diagnosis you identified in your previous assessment.
The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.
A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.
===>
Writing guide:
For this assessment, I will be analyzing the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue related to pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers, also known as bedsores, are a common problem in healthcare settings, particularly for patients who are immobile or have limited mobility. They can occur anywhere on the body, but are most common on bony areas such as the heels, ankles, hips, and tailbone. If left untreated, pressure ulcers can lead to serious complications such as infection, sepsis, and even death. Therefore, it is crucial for nurses to have access to credible and reliable evidence in order to prevent and treat pressure ulcers effectively.
When determining the credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites, there are several criteria that should be considered. One of the most important criteria is the source of the information. Peer-reviewed journal articles, for example, are considered more credible than articles from non-peer-reviewed sources because they have undergone a rigorous process of review and Assessment by experts in the field. Additionally, the author of the article should be considered, as credible sources are typically written by experts in the field or by researchers with a strong track record of publications.
Another important criteria to consider is the methodology used in the study. The study should have a clear research question, a well-defined population and sample, and appropriate methods for data collection and analysis. The study should also be free of bias and have a large sample size.
In the context of pressure ulcers, there are several credible sources of evidence that can be used to inform practice. For example, the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) is a credible source of evidence and guidelines for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. The NPUAP provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment, staging, and treatment of pressure ulcers, as well as guidelines for the use of pressure-relieving devices.
Another credible source of evidence is the Cochrane Library, which is a collection of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. The Cochrane Library provides evidence-based summaries of the effectiveness of different interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.
In conclusion, incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, such as pressure ulcers, is crucial in order to enhance clinical reasoning and judgement skills, and improve patient outcomes. By considering the source of the information, the author of the article, and the methodology used in the study, nurses can identify credible and reliable sources of evidence for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers.
===>
Instructions – NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.
For this assessment:
Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that identified. Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.
Explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF]and Evidence-Based Practice Models help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
==>
Writing guide:
A chosen diagnosis for which an evidence-based approach could be beneficial is hypertension. Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a leading risk factor for heart disease and stroke and affects a large portion of the population. Incorporating credible evidence into the management of hypertension can improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.
When determining the credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites, several criteria should be considered. These include the author’s qualifications and expertise, the publisher’s reputation, the date of publication, and any conflicts of interest. Additionally, the quality of the research design and methodology should be evaluated to ensure that the study is well-conducted and unbiased.
To analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of hypertension, a search for articles and websites on the management of hypertension should be conducted using reputable databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The search should be limited to articles and websites published within the last five years, and the criteria mentioned above should be applied to the selected resources.
The importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice (EBP) model for hypertension cannot be overstated. EBP models rely on the most current and valid research to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. By using credible evidence, nurses can be confident that the interventions and care plans they implement are based on the best available knowledge.
An example of an evidence-based practice model for hypertension is the Chronic Care Model. This model focuses on the integration of healthcare services and the active involvement of patients in the management of their chronic conditions. It emphasizes the use of evidence-based guidelines, self-management support, and care coordination to improve hypertension outcomes.
Determining the credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites is essential when implementing an evidence-based approach to managing hypertension. The use of credible evidence can improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications. By applying the criteria mentioned above and using reputable databases to search for articles and websites, nurses can ensure that the evidence they use is current, valid, and relevant to their practice.
Submission Requirements – NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:
Length of submission:2–4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
Number of references:Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting:References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Does not identify a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Identifies a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Describes a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Describes a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Provides a specific rationale for the importance or benefit of applying an evidence-based approach.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Does not list criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Lists criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Explains criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Explains criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Notes one or more ways the criteria could be applied to a specific resource.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Does not describe the credibility or relevance of evidence or resources. Describes the credibility or relevance of evidence or resources, but does not offer a complete analysis. The specific context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis may be unclear as well. Analyzes the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Analyzes the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Additionally, identifies the most useful evidence or resource based upon the analysis.
Explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Does not identify an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Identified an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, but does not explain the model or the importance of incorporating credible evidence. Explains the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Explains the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Notes specific examples of how the model could help improve the chosen issue or diagnosis.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions. Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Does not apply APA formatting to headings, intext citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, intext citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.
See NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3 Example Here
100% non-plagiarized Papers
24/7 /365 Service Available
Affordable Prices
Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
On time Delivery
Satisfaction guarantee
Make sure there’s no plagiarism in your paper
Check for plagiarism
Grammar checker image
Get help with your questions about academic writing
Ask for help
Citation generator image
Generate citations for your paper free of charge
Use citation generator
