Order custom papers, masters thesis and dissertation in 3 guided steps; human written!
Posted: September 1st, 2023
Searching and Critiquing the Evidence Bring to mind the various practice problems you and your colleagues have been considering in this course. What insights might the literature provide with regard to these issues? How should you evaluate the research? And, why is it important to review and critique this information? This Discussion addresses strategies for searching the literature in order to critique existing evidence. Please note that this Discussion is related to Application Assignment #4, which is assigned this week. You are strongly encouraged to read through that assignment now. To prepare: Review the Walden Library Webinars presented in the Learning Resources. Recall the practice problem and theoretical framework you identified for the Week 5 Discussion. Using the Walden Library and other professional databases, conduct a search and locate four (4) appropriate primary research articles¯one of which is a systematic review. Review the articles and determine what level of evidence they represent. Using the critique strategies presented in the Learning Resources as a guide, consider how the articles you located either support or weaken the merit of your theoretical framework or the importance of your practice problem. By Day 3 post a cohesive response that addresses the following: How does the literature strengthen or weaken the merit of your selected theoretical framework and practice problem? What levels of evidence are most prevalent in these articles? Why do you think that level of evidence is most prevalent? Learning Resources Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Walden Library Webinars: Conducting a Literature Search on a Clinical Research Question Evidence-Based Health Research Introduction to Health Science Research Medical Research: Finding Reviews Medical Research: Finding Studies by Type Medical Research: Health Policies and Legal Cases Recommended Webinars: Webinars on Library Skills Evidence Based Practice for NURS 6052 Required Readings Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier. Chapter 3, “Introduction to Quantitative Research” Chapter 3 provides an overview of quantitative research, the concepts custom essay writing service associated with this type of research, and different quantitative research designs. Chapter 4, “Introduction to Qualitative Research” Chapter 4 describes the philosophy of qualitative research and provides examples of how it is used in nursing research. Understanding the basic principles of quantitative and qualitative research is necessary to effectively critique research literature. Chapter 7, “Review of Relevant Literature” Chapter 7 examines the process of preparing for a literature review to support research efforts. Chapter 13, “Outcomes Research” Moran, K., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2017). The doctor of nursing practice scholarly project: A framework for success (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Review Chapter 6, “Developing the Scholarly Project” Armola, R., Bourgault, A., Halm, M., Board, R., Bucher, L., Harrington, L., & … Medina, J. (2009). AACN levels of evidence: What’s new? Critical Care Nurse, 29(4), 70–73. doi: 10.4037/ccn2009969 Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. This article provides a hierarchical evidence rating system which can be used as a guide to determine the quality and level of evidence presented in different types of research studies. Elkins, M. Y. (2010). Using PICO and the brief report to answer clinical questions. Nursing, 40(4), 59–60. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000369871.07714.39 Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. The article explains how to use the PICO method to develop clinical questions. Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I an introduction to gathering, evaluating, and recording the evidence… fifth in a series. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
We’ve put together our writing team with care, choosing talented writers who shine in their fields. Each one goes through a tough selection process, where we look for folks with deep expertise in specific subjects and a solid history of academic writing. They bring their own mix of know-how and flair to the table, making sure our content hits the mark—packed with info, easy to read, and perfect for college students like you.
We don’t do AI-written essays or copycat work—everything’s original. Competitive pricing is a big deal for us; we keep costs fair while delivering top-notch quality. Our writers are some of the best out there, and we charge rates that stack up well against other services. This means you get stellar content without draining your wallet. Our pricing is straightforward and honest, built to give you real value for your money. That’s why students turn to us for high-quality writing services that won’t break the bank.
Academic integrity is at the heart of what we do. Every paper starts from scratch, with original research and writing tailored just for you. We write 100% authentic—no plagiarism research essays. Our strict quality control process includes scanning every draft with top tools like SafeAssign and Turnitin, so you get a similarity score and proof of originality. We’re obsessive about proper citation and referencing too, crediting every source to keep things legit. It’s all about giving you peace of mind with content that meets the highest standards.
When you decide to place an order with Dissertation Writer, here is what happens: