Mary, a highschool athlete, was jealous of her teammate, Jean. When Mary noticed Jean popping out of a brewpub at 11:00 PM one evening (throughout the season), she went to her coach and accused Jean of violating group guidelines with regard to curfew and consuming alcoholic drinks. The coach had guidelines for the group, together with a 10:00 PM curfew throughout the season and a rule that if athletes had been caught consuming, they’d be suspended from the group for one (1) recreation for the primary offense. College coverage required an investigation to be held earlier than any athlete was suspended. The coach determined to make an instance of Jean, who was not a starter, and suspended her for the remainder of the season – 10 video games – though this was Jean’s first offense. The coach didn’t conduct an investigation of Mary’s fees towards Jean previous to suspending her. Jean sued the coach and the college district, searching for reinstatement to the group, claiming her due course of rights had been violated. a) Focus on the case with regard to the 2 [2] kinds of due course of, substantive and procedural. b) Clarify every kind of due course of completely sufficient for me to conclude that you simply perceive each after which apply each to those info. c) Was Jean denied due course of? d) If that’s the case, which one (or each?)? e) Who wins the case – Jean or the college district? f) Why?
Information
Why are both paradigms important to the development of nursing science?
Write a 195-word message in which you discuss: 1-Why are both paradigms important to the development of nursing science? 2-How do the authors justify having an alternative hierarchy of evidence for nursing, as contrasted with medicine (pp. 24–26, Types of Evidence and Evidence Hierarchies, Ch. 2, Nursing Research)? Read instructions: ( used attached documents to […]
