MGT4161 Management in a Globalised Context:
Task A Directions (Particular person Task)
Coursework Deadline: 5pm Friday 4th of November 2022 (submit on-line through
Turnitin)
5pm Friday the 25th of February 2022 (submit on-line through Turnitin)
Half A – Enterprise Ethics Report
Phrase Restrict: 700 phrases
Weighting 30%
Overview
Think about you’re a enterprise ethics marketing consultant, working for the corporate implicated in/ affected by the
case examine you could have chosen. You could have been employed to put in writing a report of 700 phrases explaining why the
difficulty is ethically problematic, and suggesting methods in which the corporate may reply to treatment
the difficulty.
You will need to define the case examine and the moral drawback the corporate faces, and make three
suggestions to the corporate for the way they’ll overcome the issue. The suggestions
have to be justified on the subject of one idea taught in class.
This task has two components; a brief essay and annotated bibliography. The brief essay is value
30% of the mark for this module, and the annotated bibliography is value 20% of your marks for
this module.
Half A: Directions and Construction
With the intention to full this coursework it’s essential to first select a enterprise ethics case examine; it may be
case examine we lined in class, or it may be a case examine you discover via your personal analysis. You
MUST verify with me when you’ve chosen your case examine and BEFORE you begin work on the report.
The report ought to have the next construction:
1) Introduction (100-200 phrases)
• A short define of the content material of the report and its goal.
2) The Moral Problem Going through the Firm (round 300 phrases)
• Utilizing firm reviews and credible information and on-line sources, clarify the moral difficulty going through
the corporate (if the difficulty is in the previous, write as if it had been present).
three) Suggestions (round 300 phrases)
• Utilizing the sources offered in the handbook and in-class, and some other related tutorial
sources – in addition to your personal ideas – determine, describe and apply at the least one moral or
CSR idea to determine and justify three suggestions which the corporate may
implement to handle the moral drawback outlined in the previous part.
four) Record of References (not included in phrase depend)
• All sources cited our used MUST be included in your checklist of references. This will likely be checked.
Half A- Marking Standards
Standards and sWeightingssExcellent
Introduction s(25%)
Introduction is swell-written and sconcise, and shighly related sto the content material of sthe report.
Introduction is swell written, salthough sperhaps sunfocussed at stimes.
Introduction srelates to the smain points of sthe report.
The introduction sis related to the sbrief, though smay lack srelevance to the sspecifics of the sreport.
Introduction is seither absent or sunrelated to the sbrief and the sreport.
Rationalization of sthe moral difficulty.
(30%)
The moral sproblem is sclearly defined swith adequate sdetail which is sand appropriately sreferenced. The srelevance of the scase examine to the smodule may be very sclear.
The moral sproblem is sexplained nicely sand appropriately sreferenced. The srelevance of the scase examine to the smodule is just not sexplicit, though sthe case examine is srelevant.
The moral sproblem is sexplained and scorrectly sreferenced. It’s sof relevance to sthe module, salthough that is snot clearly sdemonstrated.
An excellent try at sexplaining the sethical drawback is smade, and it’s scorrectly sreferenced. The scase examine is just not snecessarily totally srelevant to the smodule.
Description of sthe moral sproblem is sinaccurate and/ sor un referenced.
Good English sused all through swith little or no sspelling or sgrammar smistakes.
Referencing sentirely or slargely correct.
Occasional sspelling or sgrammar smistakes, however sotherwise nicely spresented with slargely correct sreferencing.
Some issues swith language or sexpression, however swell formatted.
Some issues swith referencing.
Quite a few sspelling, grammar sand/or language sproblems. Some sattempt at correct sreferencing.
Spelling, sgrammar and/or slanguage sproblems make sunderstanding sthe report sdifficult. And/or scomplete lack of saccurate sreferencing.
Half B – Annotated Bibliography
Phrase Restrict: 400 (+/- 10%)
Weighting: 20%
Half B: Overview
An annotated bibliography is an alphabetical checklist of sources with a paragraph summarizing every ssource. The paragraph ought to be round 100 phrases per supply. As with all assignments right sreferencing is essential, nevertheless errors in the referencing format will likely be notably sobvious in this task. Subsequently you must ensure you are very conversant in the Harvard sreferencing guidelines earlier than you undertake this task
Half B: Directions and Construction
Produce an annotated bibliography for at the least 4 tutorial sources cited in the work submitted sfor Half A. On this context an instructional supply is a journal article from a peer reviewed journal. It’s snot a web site or textbook.
An annotated bibliography consists of the complete quotation of the supply, adopted by a paragraph ssummarizing the details lined in the supply. The four+ sources ought to be offered in salphabetical order (as in any checklist of references or bibliography) (as in any checklist of references or bibliography).
Please be aware that this task will likely be submitted through turnitin. It’s subsequently necessary that the ssummary is in your personal phrases, and never copied from the summary of the supply.
Half B – Marking Standards
Standards sand sWeightings
Glorious s(70% & above)
Superb s(60% – 69%)
Good s(50% – 59%)
Enough s(40% – 49%)
Fail s(Beneath 40%)
The sinstructions swere adopted sfully. The ssources are shighly related sto the preliminary ssubmission and sare from nicely chosen sacademic spublications.
The referencing sis formatted scorrectly.
• Inadequate snumber of ssources s• Referencing swas incorrect s• Abstract was scopied s• Abstract was stoo temporary to sindicate sknowledge or sunderstanding sof the supply.
