For this task, you’ll conduct Web analysis on the Elizabeth Good kidnapping trials. In short, Good was kidnapped on the age of fourteen from her residence in Utah. Over 9 months later, she was discovered together with her kidnappers, Brian David Mitchell and Wanda Ileen Barzee (now deceased).
Throughout Mitchell’s trial, consideration was given with respect as to whether he was competent to face trial. The authorized normal for “competence to face trial” has not modified because the US Supreme Court docket choice: “Our problem is whether or not [the defendant] has adequate current capacity to seek the advice of along with his lawyer with an inexpensive diploma of rational understanding and whether or not he has a rational in addition to a factual understanding of the proceedings towards him” (Stafford, 2003). Whereas conducting your analysis, pay explicit consideration to the data you receive concerning her kidnapper Mitchell. Based mostly in your analysis, tackle the next:
- Describe Mitchell’s profile. Describe a few of his character traits, and clarify what you discovered about his psychological state on the time of the trial.
- Clarify how you’d proceed with assessing Mitchell’s competency to face trial. Analyze the issues you’d make, and primarily based in your Assessment, clarify whether or not you assume he was competent to face trial.
- Describe your views about Mitchell’s competency in comparison with the felony justice course of and the way it measures competency. Analyze and clarify whether or not there are any discrepancies or conflicts between these views.
Moreover, for this task, you’ll discover how clinicians decide competency to face trial.
To arrange, it’s possible you’ll learn the next articles from the Web:
Heilbrun, Okay., Hawk, G., & Tate, D. C. (1996). Juvenile Competency to face trial: Analysis points in observe. Regulation and Human Conduct, 20(5), 573–578.
Lipsitt, P. D., Lelos, D., & McGarry, A. L. (1971). Competency for trial: A screening instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 128(1), 105–109.
Zapf, P. A., &Roesch, R. (2000). Psychological competency Assessments: Tips for judges and attorneys. Court docket Overview, 37, 28–35.
After reviewing the articles, tackle the next:
- Clarify how clinicians decide competency. Establish the components that clinicians contemplate when figuring out competencies.
- Clarify what is taken into account the usual for figuring out whether or not an individual is competent to face trial.
- Describe a few of the causes evaluators should separate the developmental phases from the psychopathological causes of competence.
Submission Particulars:
- Cite all sources in APA format.
- Connect a Turnitin.com Report. Get Psychology homework help at the moment
