Unit7SWK5006 DUE NOV21
SCORING GUIDE:
UNIT7ASSIGN
Eligibility Standards
Task Overview
When inspecting eligibility guidelines, a social employee seems for an alignment between the foundations and the conceptualization of the social downside the coverage or program is supposed to deal with. Moreover, when analyzing insurance policies and packages, they search for potential issues that eligibility standards would possibly introduce, comparable to “stigma, alienation, off-targeting of advantages, overwhelming prices, over-utilization and under-utilization, political interference, and unfavourable incentives and disincentives” (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p. 106). These points characterize potential issues that undermine coverage and program performance (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p.106). Discover that the presence of any one of many issues talked about by Chambers and Bonk can work in opposition to the adequacy, fairness, and effectivity of a coverage or program. A social employee examines eligibility guidelines for consistency with the conceptualization of the social downside that the coverage or program is meant to deal with. Moreover, when analyzing insurance policies and packages, they search for potential issues that eligibility standards could introduce, comparable to “stigma, alienation, profit off-targeting, overwhelming prices, over-utilization and under-utilization, political interference, and unfavourable incentives and disincentives” (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p. 106). These are potential points that might jeopardize coverage and program performance (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p.106). You will need to be aware that the presence of any of the problems raised by Chambers and Bonk can work in opposition to the adequacy, fairness, and effectivity of a coverage or program.
By efficiently finishing this project, you’ll exhibit your proficiency within the following competencies and behaviors:
● Competency three: Advance Human Rights and Social, Financial, and Environmental Justice.
○ C3.GP.A: Apply their understanding of social, financial, and environmental justice to advocate for human rights on the particular person and system ranges.
○ Associated Task Standards:
○ Talk about how the potential coverage change would advocate for human rights and social and financial justice.
○ Clarify how and why potential coverage adjustments would advance social well-being.
Task Description
On this project, you’ll analyze the eligibility standards of an entitlement program, consider the impression of those standards, and think about how potential adjustments would possibly serve social well-being.
Task Directions
For this project, full the next:
● Clarify an entitlement program and analyze its eligibility standards.
● Utilizing the checklist from Chambers and Bonk, clarify the potential issues the particular eligibility standards would possibly introduce and ensure if any of those issues applies to this system that you’ve recognized. These potential issues embrace:
○ Stigma.
○ Alienation.
○ Off-targeting of advantages.
○ Overwhelming prices.
○ Overutilization and underutilization.
○ Political interference.
○ Unfavourable incentives and disincentives.
● Analyze any alterations within the eligibility standards that might probably scale back or remove the recognized issues.
● Clarify how and why potential coverage adjustments would advance social well-being.
● Talk about how the potential coverage change would advocate for human rights and social and financial justice.
Reference
Chambers, D. E., & Bonk, J. F. (2013). Social coverage and social packages: A way for the sensible public coverage analyst (sixth ed.). Pearson.
Submission Necessities
The project you submit is predicted to satisfy the next necessities:
● Written communication: Written communication is freed from errors that detract from the general message.
● APA formatting: Assets and citations are formatted in accordance with present APA type and formatting requirements.
● Size of paper: three–5 double-spaced pages.
● Font and font dimension: Occasions New Roman, 12 level.
UNIT7DISC1 (1PAGE)
Grant Funding: Categorical Versus Block
For this dialogue, think about the next:
● You apply for federal Help in funding a program geared toward enhancing minority well being care in your space. This system serves individuals of all ages who’re affected by specified illnesses, however has a way testing eligibility requirement that limits help primarily based on earnings degree. Examine which kind of grant funding, categorical or block, can be higher for this program, and supply sources to substantiate you selection.
—-
Readings Use your Social Coverage and Sodal Packages textual content to finish the next
• Learn Chapter 6, “Assessment of Service Supply Programs and Social Coverage Program Design,” pages 107-137.
Use the Capella Library to finish the next: • Atkinson, C., & Lucas, R. (2013). Coverage and gender in grownup social care work. Public Administration, 91(1), 159-173.
—-
Unit6 SWK5006 DUE NOV15
UNIT6DISC1(1 PAGE)
Centralized Versus Decentralized Service Supply
How does a centralized service supply mannequin differ from a decentralized service supply mannequin? Look at three variations in your response, utilizing particular examples. Determine how these variations would have an effect on company shoppers. In different phrases, how do these fashions every empower or disempower shoppers? Use this unit’s readings to tell your dialogue.
UNIT6DISC2 (1 PAGE)
Integration and Specification
How do the ideas of integration and specification distinction and work together? Present and discover at the very least two particular examples. Your Assessment ought to level out how an company may finest attempt to make the most of each ideas.
—
UNIT10 SWK5006 DUE DEC12
UNIT10ASSIGN
Social Staff as Brokers of Change
Task Overview
It’s understood that social employees are brokers of change. That’s to say, they’re educated to advocate for his or her shoppers and navigate the human companies system. Given this cost, to what extent has your participation on this course contributed to your skilled progress?
By efficiently finishing this project, you’ll exhibit your proficiency within the following competencies and behaviors:
● Competency 1: Show Moral and Skilled Conduct.
○ C1.GP.B: Use reflection and self-regulation to handle private values and keep professionalism in observe conditions.
○ Associated Task Standards:
○ Clarify the idea of use of self within the context of program and coverage planning and analysis.
○ Describe potentialities for efficient skilled improvement within the realm of program and coverage planning and improvement.
● Competency 5: Interact in Coverage Follow.
○ C5.GP.B: Assess how social welfare and financial insurance policies impression the supply of and entry to social companies.
○ Associated Task Standards:
○ Describe find out how to advocate for human rights and social and financial justice.
Task Description
This project will ask you to think about your work on this course from knowledgeable improvement perspective. What have you ever discovered or what talent has been strengthened by participating within the courseroom discussions and addressing the assignments? Inside the context of program and coverage planning and analysis, how do you view the idea of use of self? Is that this the identical or totally different perspective than the one you had firstly of this course? Lastly, how will you observe private reflection and self-correction to guarantee continuous skilled improvement within the realm of program and coverage planning and analysis?
Task Directions
For this project, reply the next:
● How do you view the idea of use of self within the context of program and coverage planning and analysis? Has this angle modified for the reason that starting of this course? How and why?
● How would you advocate for human rights and social and financial justice?
● What is going to you do to guarantee your personal skilled improvement within the realm of program and coverage planning and improvement?
Submission Necessities
The project you submit is predicted to satisfy the next necessities:
● Written communication: Written communication is freed from errors that detract from the general message.
● APA formatting: Assets and citations are formatted in accordance with present APA type and formatting requirements.
● Size of paper: three–5 double-spaced pages.
● Font and font dimension: Occasions New Roman, 12 level.
UNIT10DISC (1 PAGE)
Social Coverage and Direct Follow: Why We Should Care
Clarify how social downside analyses helps social employees in coverage creation. Then, mirror on how insurance policies have an effect on your direct service work with shoppers in your practicum training placement or employment. Lastly, share what you discovered about your self and your values after taking this course. Be particular and supply examples.
—-
Use this unit’s readings to tell your dialogue.
—
Unit9 SWK5006 DUE DEC 5
SEE GOVERNMENT POLICY within the 21st CENTURY Transcript beneath:
UNIT9ASSIGN
Social Program Description and Assessment
Task Overview
An efficient approach to learn to consider social packages or insurance policies is to concentrate on a social downside of curiosity to you after which proceed as Chambers and Bonk do, by participating within the following:
● Perceive the epistemological boundaries of the issue definition.
● Acknowledge the origins of the issue and its causes and penalties.
● Comprehend who’s impacted by this downside, each negatively and positively.
● Acknowledge what these positive factors or losses seem like and their magnitudes.
Moreover, Chambers and Bonk (2013) counsel that you will need to perceive the historic and judicial contexts of the issue (p. 185). As soon as these components are clarified, you’ll be able to determine a selected program or coverage designed to deal with the recognized social downside.
By efficiently finishing this project, you’ll exhibit your proficiency within the following competencies and behaviors:
● Competency 5: Interact in Coverage Follow.
○ C5.GP.C: Apply vital considering to investigate, formulate, and advocate for insurance policies that advance human rights and social, financial, and environmental justice.
○ Associated Task Standards:
○ 2. Describe a program or coverage designed to deal with a given social downside.
Task Description
Simply as Chambers and Bonk (2013) have finished within the last chapter of their textual content, you, as a social program and coverage learner, can apply the analysis standards mentioned within the course to a social program or coverage of your selection. On this Assessment, you’ll apply the next components to find out the effectivity and effectiveness of this system chosen:
● Program targets and targets.
● Eligibility guidelines.
● The type of the profit.
● How companies are delivered.
● How this system is financed.
It’s also necessary to evaluate the standard and amount of the interactions between these components in addition to these between this program or coverage and others (Chambers & Bonk, 2013, p. 185).
Task Directions
For this project, full the next:
● Clarify a selected social downside. In your description, embrace:
○ Ideological or worth parameters.
○ Origins, causes, and penalties of downside.
○ The particular teams or inhabitants impacted by the issue.
○ The impacts and their magnitudes.
○ The historic and judicial contexts of the issue.
● Choose a bunch that experiences the chosen social downside. This group might be distinguished by race, faith, socioeconomic standing, gender orientation, or different traits.
● Describe a program or coverage designed to deal with the chosen social downside. When choosing a program, select a small program or inner coverage that’s manageable, and whose description and mission assertion are concise sufficient to suit on one to 2 pages.
○ Embody the next elements in your description of this system: mission assertion or targets, and targets; eligibility guidelines; type of profit; administration; service supply; and financing.
● Analyze interactions between these components throughout the program itself.
● Examine and distinction this program’s eligibility necessities with these of an analogous program.
● Clarify at the very least one advice to enhance the standard of this system you could have chosen.
Reference
Chambers, D. E., & Bonk, J. F. (2013). Social coverage and social packages: A way for the sensible public coverage analyst (sixth ed.). Pearson.
Submission Necessities
The project you submit is predicted to satisfy the next necessities:
● Written communication: Written communication is freed from errors that detract from the general message.
● APA formatting: Assets and citations are formatted in accordance with present APA type and formatting requirements.
● Size of paper: four–6 double-spaced pages.
● Font and font dimension: Occasions New Roman, 12 level.
UNIT9DISC (1 PAGE)
Analyzing a Little one Poverty Program
Develop an Assessment for the problem of childhood poverty, displaying how at the very least 4 teams profit or endure on account of this subject. Embody particular examples of each gainers and losers in your response. Primarily based on the Assessment, how would you revise a coverage addressing childhood poverty? Though this dialogue refers to any coverage addressing childhood poverty, you might analysis a selected coverage to tell this dialogue.
—
Readings
Use your Social Coverage and Social Packages textual content to finish the next:
• Learn Chapter 9, “An Instance of Social Coverage and Social Program Assessment: Chosen Options of Federal Little one Welfare Laws Since 1970 Involved With Little one Abuse,” pages 167-185.
Use the Capella Library to finish the next:
• Kantor, P. (2013). The 2 faces of American city coverage [PDF]. City Affairs Assessment, 49(6), 821-850. • Klevens, J., Barnett, S. B. L., Florence, C., & Moore, D. (2015). Exploring insurance policies for the discount of kid bodily abuse and neglect. Little one Abuse & Neglect, 40, 1-11.
Multimedia Watch this interactive multimedia: • Authorities Coverage within the 21st Century.
