NRS 429 Assignment Family Health Assessment Part I
Family Health Assessment is crucial in identifying the family’s strength and weakness in terms of access to quality and affordable care. The assessment also provides crucial information to the healthcare practitioners on the threats to achieving comprehensive health and general wellness for the whole population. Furthermore, the family assessment prepares nurses especially the Family Nurse Practitioners with the relevant skills required in the assessment of the family health patterns and be able to offer family-based solutions (Peterson-Burch, 2018). The concept has also proved to be instrumental in advancement of genetic interventions in some of the complex conditions.
Family Structure
In my family health assessment, I interviewed the family of Mr. and Mrs. K. The family unit is composed of three elderly adults of age between 60 to 95 years and two young adults, a 21-year-old female and a 24-year-old male. The family is of Hispanic -American descent, Mr. K is 68-year-old retired attorney while Mrs. K is a 60-year-old retired high school teacher they live together with Mrs. K’s mother who is 92-year-old battling arthritis and Alzheimer. All the family members are practicing Catholics with an upper middle class economic standard. They have enough pension to cater for their medical, food and other family expenses.
Family Health and Family Behavior
The current family health behavior is focused on maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Mr. and Mrs. K have regular exercise schedules in the gym. They do exercise thrice a week on Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays. They do also maintain a healthy diet to keep them healthy. Mr. K has a history of hyperlipidemia while Mrs. K has hypertension, they both manage the health conditions well through diet and exercise. Their two elderly children are healthy, with no pre-existing medical conditions. They are normal with above average performance in school. They have been excelling in both academic and sporting activities. The 24-year-old son has interest in soccer and plays in the college soccer team while the 21-year-old has been participating in the tennis ball competitions since she was a 6-year-old. Mrs. K’s mother has been battling arthritis and Alzheimer for the last five years. She attends regular therapy to relieve the pain associated with arthritis.
Family Health Assessment Part I
Assessment Description
Understanding family structure and style is essential to patient and family care. Conducting a family interview and needs assessment gathers information to identify strengths, as well as potential barriers to health. This information ultimately helps develop family-centered strategies for support and guidance.
This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The information you gather in this initial assignment will be utilized for the second assignment in Topic 3.
Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused functional assessment. The questionnaire must include three open-ended, family-focused questions to assess functional health patterns for each of the following:
Values/Health Perception
Nutrition
Sleep/Rest
Elimination
Activity/Exercise
Cognitive
Sensory-Perception
Self-Perception
Role Relationship
Sexuality
Coping
Resources
Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All
Calgary Model of Family Assessment: Experience in a Community Service Project
Read “Calgary Model of Family Assessment: Experience in a Community Service Project,” by Mantelo Cecilio, Sturiao dos Santos, and
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=98719798&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost
Optional: Nurses and Families: A Guide to Family Assessment and Intervention
For additional information, the following is recommended:
Chapters 3 and 4 from the online eBook, Nurses and Families: A Guide
… Read More
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/detail.action?docID=1069220
Calgary Family Intervention Model: One Way to Think About Change
Read “Calgary Family Intervention Model: One Way to Think About Change,” by Wright and Leahey, from Journal of Marital and Fa
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/calgary-family-intervention-model-one-way-think/docview/220942774/se-2?accountid=7374
Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum
Read Chapter 4 in Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum.
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/health-promotion_health-and-wellness-across-the-continuum_1e.php
Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models: Reflections on the Reciprocity Between the Personal and the Professional
Read “Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models: Reflections on the Reciprocity Between the Personal and t
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.or
Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the family to conduct an interview. Utilize the interview questions complied in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused functional assessment. Document the responses as you conduct the interview.
Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper. Analyze your assessment findings. Submit your questionnaire as an appendix with your assignment.
Include the following in your paper:
Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any relevant attributes defining the family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, and environment.
Summarize the overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health of the family.
Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.
Describe how family systems theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in turn, initiate positive changes to the overall family functions over time.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need Helpance.
Topic 2 DQ 1
Description:
What is a definition of family that encompasses the different family structures prevalent today? Discuss the importance of acknowledging nontraditional family structures. Explain how family systems theory can be used to better understand the interactions of a modern family (traditional or nontraditional).
Topic 2 DQ 2
Description:
Why is the concept of family health important? Consider the various strategies for health promotion. How does a nurse determine which strategy would best enable the targeted individuals to gain more control over, and improve, their health?
Topic 2 Participation
Description:
NA
Topic 2: The Form and Function of Family
Description
Objectives:
1. Discuss contemporary family structures.
2. Discuss the concepts related to family health promotion.
3. Apply family systems theory.
4. Develop strategies for family-centered health promotion.
Study Materials
Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum
Description:
Read Chapter 4 in Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum.
Calgary Family Intervention Model: One Way to Think About Change
Description:
Read “Calgary Family Intervention Model: One Way to Think About Change,” by Wright and Leahey, from Journal of Marital and Family Therapy(1994).
Calgary Model of Family Assessment: Experience in a Community Service Project
Description:
Read “Calgary Model of Family Assessment: Experience in a Community Service Project,” by Mantelo Cecilio, Sturiao dos Santos, and Silva Marcon, from Cogitare Enfermagem(2014).
Optional: Nurses and Families: A Guide to Family Assessment and Intervention
Description:
For additional information, the following is recommended:
Chapters 3 and 4 from the online eBook, Nurses and Families: A Guide to Family Assessment and Intervention, by Wright and Leahey (2012), available through ProQuest Ebook Central in the GCU Library.
Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models: Reflections on the Reciprocity Between the Personal and the Professional
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 429 Assignment Family Health Assessment Part I
NRS 429 Assignment Family Health Assessment Part I
NRS 429 Assignment Family Health Assessment Part I
Description:
Read “Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models: Reflections on the Reciprocity Between the Personal and the Professional,” by Leahey and Wright, from Journal of Family Nursing(2016).
Initial Course Survey
Description:
In an effort for continuous improvement, Grand Canyon University would like you to provide feedback about your experience with the university. Your participation is appreciated. Click on the link to begin the survey.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Family Health Assessment Part I – Rubric
Collapse All Family Health Assessment Part I – RubricCollapse All
Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns
5. Excellent
22.5 points
The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions.
4. Good
20.03 points
The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.
Family Structure
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)
5. Excellent
22.5 points
The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.
4. Good
20.03 points
The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of family structure omitted.
Family Health and Health Behaviors
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Family Health and Health Behaviors
5. Excellent
22.5 points
Health behaviors are identified and presented in detail. The current health of the family is described. A clear understanding of family health and health behavior is demonstrated.
4. Good
20.03 points
Health behaviors are identified and presented. The current health behaviors of the family are described.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
Health behaviors and current health of the family are summarized. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are generally presented.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.
Findings (functional health patterns strengths, health problems or barriers to health)
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Findings (functional health patterns strengths, health problems or barriers to health)
5. Excellent
22.5 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to health are discussed. Discussion identifies and assesses key aspects from findings. Discussion demonstrates insight into assessment of findings to identify functional health pattern strengths and health problems or barriers.
4. Good
20.03 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to health are discussed. Aspects presented are relevant and consistent with findings.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to health are summarized. Aspects presented are relevant and generally consistent with findings.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, and three health problems or barriers to health are partially presented. Some aspects presented are not relevant, or are not consistent with findings.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Functional health pattern strengths, health problems, and barriers to health are not presented as indicated in assignment criteria.
Application of Family Systems Theory
30 points
Criteria Description
Application of Family Systems Theory
5. Excellent
30 points
Application of family systems theory to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is thoroughly discussed. The manner in which the theory is applied is highly relevant and strongly supports steps to achieving the desired outcomes.
4. Good
26.7 points
Application of family systems theory to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is discussed. The manner in which the theory is applied is relevant and generally supports steps toward the desired outcomes.
3. Satisfactory
23.7 points
Application of family systems theory is presented. A general discussion on how the theory will be applied to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is presented. There are minor inaccuracies in the application or representation of the theory.
2. Less than Satisfactory
22.5 points
Application of family systems theory is partially presented. It is unclear how the theory will be applied to positively change overall family functions over time. There are inaccuracies in the application or representation of the theory.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Application of family systems theory is not presented.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
6.68 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
6.68 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
6.68 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
3 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
3 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
2.67 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
2.37 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
2.25 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
4.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
4.01 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
3.56 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
3.38 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Topic 2 DQ 1
What is a definition of family that encompasses the different family structures prevalent today? Discuss the importance of acknowledging nontraditional family structures. Explain how family systems theory can be used to better understand the interactions of a modern family (traditional or nontraditional).
As our word evolves, family structures follow, becoming more modern and advanced. Elders used to often live with families and now it is less likely with a rise in elder couples living together without their children. In the U.S., adults ages 60 and older also are more likely than their counterparts around the world to live as a couple without young children at home (Ausubel, 2020). Although this is much more common, it is also not to say that extended family does not live together. Globally, living in extended-family households is the most common arrangement for people 60 and older (Ausubel, 2020). Other family structures include having stepparents, childless families, single parent families and those having the more traditional nuclear family (Blessing 2021). It is important to recognize all structures especially when interacting with patients. Using the family system theory can help us better understand the interactions between traditional or nontraditional families as we can use it to evaluate subpersonalities. These subpersonalities are individual to viewpoint and are each unique. Knowing someone’s family structure to understand and analyze their viewpoints can allow us to provide more involved and tailored care. Further, knowing the relationships of their family can allow us to do further psychosocial care. Family can have a huge impact on healing when an individual is sick. If someone has poor ties to their family or lacks close members, we must ensure we are caring for them in ways that family might to help them feel seen and aid in their healing process.
References:
Blessings, M. (2021). Types of Family Structures. Love to Know. https://family.lovetoknow.com/about-family-values/types-family-structures
Ausubel, J. (2020). Older people are more likely to live alone in the U.S. than elsewhere in the world. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/03/10/older-people-are-more-likely-to-live-alone-in-the-u-s-than-elsewhere-in-the-world/
REPLY
SW
Topic 2 DQ 2
Why is the concept of family health important? Consider the various strategies for health promotion. How does a nurse determine which strategy would best enable the targeted individuals to gain more control over, and improve, their health?
Replies to Joy Adiboshi
The concept of family health is important because of the many components and influences a family has on one another in relation to health promotion. Health behaviors can be significantly impacted by one’s environment, significant others, family members, and support system in general, utilizing tools like the genogram can be helpful to encompass many of the components (Green, 2018). Therefore, family health in general can play an influential role in an individual’s life to better their health and prosperity. As mentioned in the previous discussion, family structure, family function, one family member’s behaviors can all impact the individual. There are various strategies for health promotion, such as, utilizing binocular focusing to offer well balanced assessment of the family dynamic, as well as, incorporating personalized interventions for them to improve and impact many aspects of their life (Leahey & Wright, 2016). In order to understand the best approach to allow an individual to gain more control over and improve their health begins with a proper and adequate assessment, all the while keeping focus on the targeted goals for the individual, particular interventions realistic to their lifestyle, and providing methods they are able to access in order to meet these individualized goals. Strategies can include incorporating the family dynamic in planning, understanding their background, their behaviors, and enlisting their Helpance in creating a plan for each person or individual to implement in a set period of time. Incorporating the individuals involved in this health promotion plan in the decision making process, asking questions, offering clarity can play a significant role in how well the plan is laid out and met. Each individual will require a different approach, some will require small goals that are simple, some will require a greater image of the whole idea, and some may require hands-on Helpance. These considerations will offer an individual and their family the greatest chance at success in providing health promotion.
References:
Green, Z. S. (2018). Understanding Families and Health Promotion. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs429vn/health-promotion-health-and-wellness-across-the-continuum/v1.1/#/chapter/4
Wright, L. M., & Leahey, M. (1994). Calgary Family Intervention Model: One way to think about change. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20(4), 381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb00128.x
Family Health Assessment Part I – Rubric
Collapse All Family Health Assessment Part I – RubricCollapse All
Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns
5. Excellent
22.5 points
The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions.
4. Good
20.03 points
The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.
Family Structure
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)
5. Excellent
22.5 points
The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.
4. Good
20.03 points
The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of family structure omitted.
Family Health and Health Behaviors
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Family Health and Health Behaviors
5. Excellent
22.5 points
Health behaviors are identified and presented in detail. The current health of the family is described. A clear understanding of family health and health behavior is demonstrated.
4. Good
20.03 points
Health behaviors are identified and presented. The current health behaviors of the family are described.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
Health behaviors and current health of the family are summarized. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are generally presented.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.
Findings (functional health patterns strengths, health problems or barriers to health)
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Findings (functional health patterns strengths, health problems or barriers to health)
5. Excellent
22.5 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to health are discussed. Discussion identifies and assesses key aspects from findings. Discussion demonstrates insight into assessment of findings to identify functional health pattern strengths and health problems or barriers.
4. Good
20.03 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to health are discussed. Aspects presented are relevant and consistent with findings.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to health are summarized. Aspects presented are relevant and generally consistent with findings.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
Two functional health pattern strengths, and three health problems or barriers to health are partially presented. Some aspects presented are not relevant, or are not consistent with findings.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Functional health pattern strengths, health problems, and barriers to health are not presented as indicated in assignment criteria.
Application of Family Systems Theory
30 points
Criteria Description
Application of Family Systems Theory
5. Excellent
30 points
Application of family systems theory to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is thoroughly discussed. The manner in which the theory is applied is highly relevant and strongly supports steps to achieving the desired outcomes.
4. Good
26.7 points
Application of family systems theory to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is discussed. The manner in which the theory is applied is relevant and generally supports steps toward the desired outcomes.
3. Satisfactory
23.7 points
Application of family systems theory is presented. A general discussion on how the theory will be applied to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is presented. There are minor inaccuracies in the application or representation of the theory.
2. Less than Satisfactory
22.5 points
Application of family systems theory is partially presented. It is unclear how the theory will be applied to positively change overall family functions over time. There are inaccuracies in the application or representation of the theory.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Application of family systems theory is not presented.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
6.68 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
6.68 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
6.68 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
3 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
3 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
2.67 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
2.37 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
2.25 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
4.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
4.01 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
3.56 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
3.38 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
