Rubric
NU410 Wit Analysis Rubric
NU410 Wit Analysis Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
NM410-CO2 5 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points. 4.5 pts
Level 4
Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points. 4 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points. 3.5 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused. 3 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable. 0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
NM410-CO5 10 pts
Level 5
Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more). 9 pts
Level 4
Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects. 8 pts
Level 3
Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects. 7 pts
Level 2
Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified. 6 pts
Level 1
Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches. 0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
NM410-CO4; NM410-CO6 30 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. 27 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed. 24 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial. 21 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors. 18 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement. 0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis 25 pts
Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 23 pts
Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 20 pts
Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 18 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities. 15 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 10 pts
Level 5
Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings. 9 pts
Level 4
Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings. 8 pts
Level 3
Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings. 7 pts
Level 2
Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings. 6 pts
Level 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings. 0 pts
Level 0
States an illogical conclusion from findings.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications 10 pts
Level 5
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications. 9 pts
Level 4
Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications. 8 pts
Level 3
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications. 7 pts
Level 2
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications. 6 pts
Level 1
Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported. 0 pts
Level 0
Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 5 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 4.5 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. 4 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 3.5 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 3 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I 5 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 4.5 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 4 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3.5 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 3 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Instructions
This is your review and what follows is only a suggestion of ideas you may want to include. Bolded items are a must.
• The review is to be concise and succinct.
• Reviews longer than 1000 words will not be accepted.
• Reviews of 500 words will be applauded and reviews of 300 words or less will be held as exemplars as long as they contain the necessary information and a thoughtful, insightful analysis.
• Follow APA format including a title page.
• Paragraphs should be organized in thought and be five to seven sentences in length.
• Review must contain 1 quote (from a scholarly, peer-reviewed article and/or your textbook) See rubric or instructor for further questions.
• Successful completion of this review is 100 points.
Paragraph 1: Thesis sentence (attention grabbing), name of the movie, and main theme or genre, (Place your review in the framework of the implications it has on healthcare that makes sense to your audience and alerts readers to your “take” on the movie). In other words, review it as a nurse and let your audience know this context. Include the thesis of the movie (Description of the topic and overall perspective, argument or purpose) and your thesis about the movie.
Paragraph 2: Summarize the movie concisely. Remember, you only have 5-7 sentences here.
Paragraph 3: Critical assessment of the content (what was noteworthy, effectiveness or persuasiveness, how it enhanced (or not) your understanding of the issue). Use tact in your criticism and evidence for your assertions. You may use more paragraphs here but remember to make your point succinctly.
Paragraph 4: Discuss ethical principles (i.e. autonomy, justice, beneficience, nonmaleficence) and ethical approaches (i.e. deontology, utilitarianism) which were evident in the movie or relate to situations in the movie.
Paragraph 5: Conclusion: Restate your thesis. Include your recommendation as well as the audience it is best suited for. Present a balanced argument about the movie’s value for the audience. This may include a timeline, a venue, or a population type it may appeal to. You are entitled to express strong agreement or disagreement but remain professional in voicing your opinion.
