A Christian man lost his job due to company downsizing. He and his spouse interpreted Rom eight:28 (“All issues work collectively for good”) to imply that he lost his job in order that God may give him a better-paying one. Consequently, he turned down a number of lower-or-equal paying job alternatives and remained on unemployment for over two years earlier than returning to work. Do you agree with his manner of decoding this verse? Why or why not?
——
Due to office cutbacks, a Christian man lost his job. He and his spouse understood Rom eight:28 (“All issues work collectively for good”) to point out that he lost his job to ensure that God to present him with a better-paying one. Because of this, he turned down a number of lower-paying job prospects and was out of labor for over two years earlier than returning to work. Do you agree with his interpretation of this verse? If that’s the case, why or why not?
