SUPPLEMENTARY ASSIGNMENT QUESTION.
This assessment task provides the opportunity to demonstrate students’ understanding of the different research philosophies and methodologies covered throughout the unit. Students will critically review and analyse below-given research articles with an in-depth discussion, justification and analysis of methodology and methods. Students are required to provide a summary of the review at the end to demonstrate a well-developed understanding of the validity and reliability/trustworthiness of the research study.
For this assessment:
Identify a research study given below.
Analyse and critically Review using the appropriate Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) tool.
Argue and justify whether the methodology and methods are appropriate to address the research problem.
Students are required to articulate, discuss, and justify the strengths and weaknesses using relevant supporting evidence.
Assessment criteria:
•Your assignment must have an introduction, a body (which is the content of your analysis) and a conclusion.
•Use at least 10 additional peer-reviewed journal articles using APA 7th
FORMAT/guidelines to support your analysis. Information cited from an unreliable website, pamphlets or magazines is not acceptable for this paper.
ARTICLE :-
Olason, M. Andrason, R. H., Jonsdottir, I. H., Kristbergsdottir, H. (2018) Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Pain: a Randomized Control Trial with a 3-year Follow-up (Links to an external site.), Int J Behav. Med 25:55-66.
Assessment Tool
CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist https://casp-uk.net/wpcontent/uploads/2020/10/CASP_RCT_Checklist_PDF_Fillable_Form.pdf.
A QUESTION FOR SUPPLEMENTARY ASSIGNMENT.
During this assessment work, students will have the opportunity to demonstrate their comprehension of the various research philosophies and methodologies that have been taught during the unit. Students will critically analyze and analyse the research articles provided below, with an in-depth discussion, justification, and analysis of methodology and methods included as part of the review and analysis. In order to demonstrate a well-developed comprehension of the validity, reliability, and trustworthiness of the research study, students are asked to present a summary of the review at the conclusion of the course.
For the purposes of this Assessment:
Identify a research study from the list provided below.
Analyze and evaluate critically Utilize a critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) instrument that is appropriate for the situation.
Make a case for and provide justification for why the methodology and procedures chosen are appropriate for the study challenge.
Students are expected to articulate, discuss, and justify the advantages and disadvantages of their chosen option(s) using appropriate supporting information.
•Your assignment must include an introduction, a body (which contains the content of your analysis), and a conclusion. •Your assignment must be formatted as follows:
•For your analysis, you should use at least 10 more peer-reviewed journal articles written in accordance with the APA 7th FORMAT/guidelines. For this paper, it is not permissible to use information from an unreliable website, pamphlet, or magazine as a source.
Int. J. Behav. Med., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55-66, 2018. ARTICLE:- Olason, M., Andrason, R. H., Jonsdottir, I. H., and Kristbergsdottir, H. (2018). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in a Chronic Pain Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Control Trial with a 3-year Follow-up (Links to an external site.
CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist https://casp-uk.net/wpcontent/uploads/2020/10/CASP RCT Checklist PDF Fillable Form.pdf is an assessment tool for conducting randomised controlled trials.

Published by

Write

View all posts