ANTH 140: Second Assignment Due: no later than 11:00 p.m.
Primate Conservation (20 factors) on Friday 10/21/2022
The ANTH 140 second task for this class asks you to analysis 5 (5) or extra respected sources a few particular endangered species of prosimian or monkey of your selection (not an ape), then write a 2-Three web page report in your findings. Your work should embody a separate supply web page in APA format. The supply web page doesn’t rely as a part of the entire web page requirement for this task. This task is price 20 factors.
IMPORTANT: Select solely ONE particular endangered species of prosimian or monkey for this task, NOT a whole genus or generalized group.
So How Do I Begin?
• Learn the “Primate Conservation” chapter for context data for this task. A hyperlink to this chapter might be discovered on the Second Assignment web page instantly above the task hyperlink.
• Select an endangered species of prosimian or monkey to analysis for this task. Search the Web and evaluate a number of acceptable species earlier than making your choice.
• Lookup and skim at the very least 5 totally different sources about this endangered non-human primate species.
o Sources for this task should be from .org or .edu or .gov sources (NO .com sources, no encyclopedia or Wikipedia sources). Make it possible for your sources are current!
• Create a supply web page that comprises the complete supply quotation in APA format for each supply used to analysis data on your paper.
APA Supply Quotation Format:
Household identify of writer(s), adopted by private identify preliminary(s). (12 months of publication). Title of article. Publication, quantity quantity (subject quantity), web page numbers. DOI quantity (Digital Object Info quantity) if out there.
Examples:
Smithson, J. and Brittan, G. (2020). Endangered Bison bonasus. Bison Weekly, Vol. 2(subject 16), pp. 45-47.
The place the wild issues are usually not. (2018). Animal Conservation. Retrieved 6/15/2021 from www.animalsnearextinction.edu (this isn’t an actual web site!)
How one can assemble your paper:
o Introduce your chosen endangered species: identify, location, bodily and behavioral traits
o Describe the habitat and surroundings by which this endangered non-human primate is often discovered
o Focus on the components that contribute to the endangered standing of your chosen species
o Overview attainable methods to mitigate the components that contribute to the endangered standing of your chosen species
o Conclude your report together with your ultimate ideas about what you discovered from this task
Format Necessities:
• Your identify, title of task and date written should be within the high left nook of first web page (NOTHING ELSE!).
• Double-spaced, 12-point font, written in English, minimal of two FULL pages or extra.
• Indent the beginning of every new paragraph. No further traces between paragraphs.
IMPORTANT:
Each pupil should write their very own, authentic work written particularly for this fall 2022 class, primarily based on their particular person understanding of the sources used on this task. DO NOT copy from any supply or outsource building of this paper. Use your personal phrases and syntax to restate data that you just personally discovered from researching this paper.
Plagiarized papers will obtain a rating of “zero”.
Please learn this details about what constitutes plagiarism:
Plagiarism | College of Oxford
Plagiarism FAQs // Purdue Writing Lab
Grading Rubric
This task is price 20 factors: 15 factors for addressing all elements of the task immediate plus 5 factors for full and appropriately formatted supply web page.
• Glorious work (rating 18-20): Demonstrates thorough understanding of the articles by way of particular, detailed dialogue. Assessment addresses all elements of the task immediate. Conclusion is complete and concise.
• Good work (rating 16-17): Demonstrates reasonable understanding of the subject by way of dialogue, however lacks ample element. Assessment addresses elements of the task immediate, however will not be thorough. Conclusion is ample however not thorough.
• Ample work (rating 14-15): Demonstrates some understanding of the subject however lacks ample dialogue. Annotations lack particulars and/or inadequate understanding of analysis data. Ready to attract generic conclusion or lacking conclusion.
• Not acceptable work (rating 11 or under): Didn’t perceive the task, didn’t ask for Help.
• Plagiarized work or no task submitted: rating of “zero”
