Assessment 1: Essay (E-tivities) & Annotated Bibliography
Process Overview
Course NUR8340: The Legislation and Well being Care Observe
Assessment title Essay (E-tivities) & Annotated Bibliography
Temporary activity description The primary a part of this Assessment requires you to take part in a minimal of 4 (Four) Etivities. These will type Half A – essay. You’ll then find 4 (Four) latest journal articles on one among your chosen E-tivity matters, related to your office, and supply an annotated bibliography of those articles.
Rationale for Assessment activity This Assessment will allow you to hyperlink a related authorized and/or moral concern in your office to the literature and make sense of how present analysis could be put into observe. Proof based mostly observe at work.
Due Date Tuesday 19th April 2022 by 2355 AEST.
Size 1500 phrases for the Essay (E-tivities).
1500-1800 phrases for the Annotated Bibliography. The reference for every chosen article will not be included within the phrase rely.
Marks out of: Weighting: Whole marks /100
50% of ultimate grade.
Course
Targets
2. Critically evaluate modern legislation and well being literatures to tell authorized, moral, well being care observe.
5. Make use of a practical software of theories and rules of legislation and ethics to the design of reasoned responses to crucial incidents in well being care observe.
Process Particulars For this Assessment you’ll apply and contextualise superior data and understanding of Australian healthcare legislation and/or ethics that impacts in your office, by means of contributing to E-tivities and an annotated bibliography.
PART A – Essay – E-tivities:
Format: You’ll submit proof of participation within the E-tivities by copying and pasting your chosen contributions from the Research Desk E-tivity Boards onto a Phrase doc file for submission. Please use a heading for every E-tivity indicating the week it got here from.
Pointers for E-tivities
• Every week, an E-tivity can be assigned as a part of your weekly actions. Learn what the exercise is asking you to do and submit your response on that week’s Etivity Discussion board.
• Full a minimal of 4 (Four) E-tivities on 4 (Four) completely different weeks (there isn’t a most to the variety of contributions you may make),
• You’re to Help a minimum of two (2) of your E-tivity contributions with a minimal of 1 (1) modern literature supply and supply a reference for
that supply utilizing APA seventh version referencing fashion on the finish of your E-tivity submit.
• Select a minimal of 4 (Four) of your E-tivity responses and duplicate and paste them onto a phrase doc. These type Half A of this Assessment.
NOTE: The 4 (Four) E-tivities chosen should equal 1500 phrases (+/-10%). When you select to make use of greater than 4 (Four) contributions, please don’t exceed 1500 phrases (+/-10%).
Intext referencing is included within the phrase rely, however the reference supply on the finish will not be.
Half B – Annotated Bibliography:
1. Select one of many matters from Half A, your E-tivity participation, and find 4 (Four) modern journal articles related to your chosen matter (one article could be the one you utilized in your dialogue). For instance: every week’s E-tivity matches the content material of that week. When you submit the Week 5 E-tivity in Half A, then you might select Negligence as your matter for Half B and you’ll find 4 (Four) journal articles on Negligence.
Write an annotated bibliography on every article utilizing the next format:
• One introduction for the entire annotated bibliography part – introduce your chosen matter and the articles you’ll focus on. (100-150 phrases)
• Full quotation for every article immediately above its annotated bibliography – APA
seventh referencing have to be used. (not included within the phrase rely)
• Annotation Bibliography (one for every article):
o a abstract of the article in your individual phrases (one paragraph).
(100-150 phrases) o a critique of the article, which is a quick assertion in regards to the article’s calibre ie:
? is the article simple to know and present?
? is the article simple to set out effectively – headings/subheadings?
? Is the creator(s) credible?
? Are the interpretation of findings appropriate?
? what sort of viewers would profit from studying this text?
(100-150 phrases)
o a mirrored image on the articles worth ie:
? how related is the data within the article to your individual observe as a well being care skilled? (100-150 phrases)
NB: the phrase rely in purple beside every part is a information solely.
Assets obtainable to help with activity The StudyDesk Assessment Tab comprises the next sources that will help you with this Assessment:
– Data on the best way to write an Annotated Bibliography.
– Data on the best way to do APA seventh version referencing fashion.
– Hyperlink to the library APA seventh version referencing information.
Help for educational writing (and referencing) is on the market from the Studying Advisor and Liaison Librarian, you could find info and speak to them through their web site: Research and Analysis Help for Well being & Group college students
Writing & formatting necessities Case research and dialogue on the authorized and moral points can be in tutorial writing fashion ie third individual.
Reflection, part (Four), could also be in first individual.
Assignments ought to be offered utilizing:
• Double-line spacing
• Occasions New Roman, 12 level font
• APA formatting (seventh Version as per APA information)
• Footer with title, scholar quantity & web page quantity
Referencing/ citations • For this Assessment you’ll use APA seventh referencing fashion.
• Sources: your reference checklist should embody a minimum of eight scholarly sources with the bulk no older than 6 years outdated (4 of them can be your chosen articles for the Annotated Bibliography).
In textual content citations: You have to embody intext citations within the physique of your work. Every new level or piece of proof have to be attributed (through in-text quotation) to the supply.
Submission What it’s good to submit:
One Microsoft Phrase doc to the submission hyperlink on the course StudyDesk that comprises the next gadgets:
• The Essay and Annotated Bibliography as one doc,
• No coversheet however footer should embody: course code, semester and yr, scholar title, scholar quantity, web page quantity
• Do NOT embody the marking standards sheet
• Save your doc with the next naming conference:
surname_initial_NUR8340_A1.doc
E.g: Jones_J_NUR8340_A1.doc
Please add the 4 journal articles, or a transparent hyperlink to them (eg. URL), on a separate web page to the second submission hyperlink – Save your doc with the next naming conference: surname_initial_NUR8340_A1articles.doc
E.g: Jones_J_NUR8340_A1articles.doc
Marking and moderating • This activity can be marked towards a marking rubric obtainable on StudyDesk.
• All employees who’re assessing your work meet to debate and examine their judgements earlier than marks or grades are finalised.
Tutorial integrity & Misconduct College students ought to be aware of, and abide by, USQ’s coverage on Tutorial Integrity and the definition of Tutorial Misconduct . Penalties apply to scholar’s discovered to have breached these insurance policies & procedures.
Assessment coverage &
process
Data and hyperlinks concerning USQ’s Assessment coverage/ process; extensions and late submissions; tutorial integrity & misconduct and marking are discovered in your course StudyDesk Assessment web page.
Word on Late submission & extensions: Functions for an extension of time will solely be thought-about if acquired in accordance with the USQ Assessment process and the Assessment of Compassionate and Compelling Circumstances Process. Check with the hyperlinks on StudyDesk for copies of those procedures.
NUR8340: The Legislation and Well being Care Observe. Semester 1, 2022
Assessment 1: Annotated Bibliography and Essay – Marking Rubric
E-tivity 20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – zero
Contributions to E-tivities
(20 marks) Proof of Four or extra Etivity contributions to Four completely different weeks, that are extremely articulate and related to the week’s matter.
Proof of Four E-tivity contributions to Three-Four completely different weeks, that are related to the week’s matter. Proof of Three-Four E-tivity contributions to Three-Four completely different weeks, that are principally related to the week’s matter. Proof of 2-Three E-tivity contributions to 2-Three completely different weeks which try to be related to the week’s matter. Proof of 1 (1) or extra contributions to E-tivities which aren’t related to the week’s matter.
No proof of contributing to an E-tivity.
6 – 5.1 Four.6 – 5 Four.5 – Four
Three.9 – Three 2.9 – zero
Referencing
in E-tivities
APA7th ed referencing
fashion used
(6 marks) A minimal of two (2) reference sources have been used to Help a minimal of two (2) E-tivity discussions.
APA7 is used appropriately to cited sources each inside textual content and on the finish of the Etivity with no errors.
Two (2) reference sources have been used to Help two (2) E-tivity discussions.
APA7 is used appropriately to quote sources each inside textual content and on the finish of the E-tivity with some minor errors. Two (2) reference sources have been used to Help one (1) E-tivity dialogue.
APA7 is usually used appropriately to quote supply(s) inside textual content and on the finish of the E-tivity with quite a few minor errors.
One (1) reference supply has been used to Help one (1) E-tivity dialogue.
APA7 is usually used appropriately to quote the supply inside textual content and/or on the finish of the E-tivity with main errors.
An try to supply one (1) reference supply has been made intext solely/no reference sources have been used to Help the E-tivity dialogue.
APA7 has not been appropriately used intext/no referencing.
Annotated Bibliography
Four
Three
2
1
zero.9 – zero
Bibliographic (reference) particulars APA
seventh ed
(Four marks) All 4 (Four) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited in appropriate APA7 referencing format with no errors. All 4 (Four) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited in appropriate APA7 referencing format with one error. All 4 (Four) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited in appropriate APA7 referencing format with twothree errors. All 4 (Four) annotated bibliography journal articles are cited with an try at APA7 referencing format with greater than 4 errors. There are omitted or no citations for the annotated bibliography journal articles/
APA7 referencing format has not been used.
5
Four
Three
2
1 – zero
Introduction to Annotated Bibliography
(5 marks) Extremely related complete introduction. Defines matter at a sophisticated stage and features a complete introduction to the annotated bibliography articles. Nicely-developed introduction. Defines the subject and contains an introduction to the annotated bibliography articles.
Efficient try at writing an introduction. Defines the subject and makes an attempt to introduce the annotated bibliography articles. An try made to supply an introduction,
The subject chosen will not be clear. Some/imprecise proof of introducing the annotated bibliography articles. Insufficient and/or poor introduction.
Minimal/no proof of an summary of the annotated bibliography.
20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – zero
Abstract of
article
(20 marks – 5 marks for every article) A complicated selection of all articles that are related to the subject.
A complete abstract, demonstrating a radical understanding of every article has been offered.
There isn’t a repetitiveness within the summaries. All articles have been effectively chosen and are related to the subject.
A complete abstract, demonstrating a substantial understanding of every article has been offered.
There isn’t a repetitiveness within the summaries. All articles chosen are related to the subject. A transparent abstract, demonstrating a broad understanding of every article has been offered. There’s some repetitiveness within the summaries. All articles chosen are considerably related to the subject.
A abstract, demonstrating a starting understanding of every article has been offered however is unclear at occasions.
There are a selection of repetitive statements within the summaries. Articles chosen are usually not related to the subject/ there are
lower than 5 articles chosen/ no abstract has been offered.
20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – zero
Critique of every article (20 marks – 5 marks for every article) A complete critique of every article is offered which is very articulate and clearly describes how the article is ready out and who would profit from studying it.
Extremely related rationales are used to Help the critique. There’s a excessive stage of synthesis of the fabric. A considerable critique of every article is offered which is articulate and clearly describes how the article is ready out and who would profit from studying it.
Related rationales are used to Help the critique. Materials is effectively synthesised. A sound critique of every article is offered which describes how the article is ready out and who would profit from studying it.
Sound rationales are used to Help the critique nevertheless better synthesis is required. A broad critique of every article is offered which makes an attempt to describes how the article is ready out and who would profit from studying it.
An try has been made to supply rationales to Help the critique, nevertheless extra element and relevance is required. A restricted/no critique of every article is offered. It’s not clear how the article is ready out and who would profit from studying it, or there isn’t a info offered.
Restricted/no try to supply rationales to Help the critique.
20 – 17 16.9 – 15 14.9 – 13 12.9 – 10 9.9 – zero
Reflection for every article (20 marks – 5 marks for every article) A extremely articulated and complete reflection on every article is offered.
A extremely articulated reflection
on relevance to personal skilled observe is offered.
A related and concise reflection on every article is offered.
A well-articulated reflection on relevance to personal skilled observe is offered. A sound reflection on every
article is offered nevertheless some generalisations used moderately than private reflection.
Relevance to personal skilled observe is offered. A generic reflection is supplied with an try at a private reflection.
It’s unclear what the relevance is to personal skilled observe.
The reflection is imprecise and generic with no try at private reflection/ No reflection is offered.
No try at offering info on relevance to personal skilled observe.
5 Four Three 2 1 – zero
Tutorial
writing/ expression/ grammar (5 marks) Phrase restrict has been adhered to.
Excessive normal of educational presentation with formatting fashion adhered to.
Good normal of educational presentation with formatting fashion principally adhered to.
Sound normal of educational presentation with some errors in formatting fashion.
Fundamental/newbie normal of educational presentation with various errors in formatting fashion.
Phrase restrict has not been adhered to.
Assessment is poorly offered demonstrating poor understanding of educational presentation. Quite a few errors in formatting fashion.
Writing is obvious, concise & fluent with few/no spelling or
grammatical errors
Construction:
Nicely-constructed with wonderful paragraph and sentence construction. Writing fashion conforming to Assessment directions. Writing is obvious & fluent with some spelling and/or
grammatical errors
Construction:
Nicely-constructed with good paragraph and sentence construction. Writing fashion principally conforming to Assessment directions. Writing is usually clear however lacks fluency in locations with various spelling and/or grammatical errors
Construction:
Some paragraph and/or sentence construction errors. Writing fashion principally conforming to Assessment directions. Writing is unclear and lacks fluency in locations with many spelling and/or grammatical
errors
Construction:
There are paragraph and/or sentence construction errors. Writing fashion partially conforms to Assessment directions. Writing is tough to comply with with
main spelling and grammatical errors.
Construction:
Poor paragraph and sentence construction. Writing fashion doesn’t conform to Assessment directions.
All marking is accomplished in Turnitin. You’ll discover your suggestions and marks there. This rubric is in your reference solely.
Please notice that a LATE PENALTY of 5% of the whole marks obtainable for the Assessment can be deducted for every day the Assessment is late.

Published by

Medical

View all posts