Assessment assignment difference diagnoses
Practicum Expertise – SOAP Notice and Journal – 10
After finishing this week’s Practicum Expertise, choose a affected person that you simply examined over the past three weeks. With this affected person in thoughts, handle the next in a SOAP Notice:
• Subjective: What particulars did the affected person present relating to his or her private and medical historical past?
• Goal: What observations did you make in the course of the bodily Assessment?
• Assessment: What have been your differential diagnoses? Present a minimal of three attainable diagnoses. Checklist them from highest precedence to lowest precedence. What was your major analysis and why?
• Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and first analysis? What was your plan for therapy and administration together with various therapies?
• Reflection notes: What would you do in another way in an identical affected person analysis?
Rubric Element
Choose Grid View or Checklist View to alter the rubric’s structure.
Identify: NURS_6531_Week_10_Application_Rubric
• Grid View
• Checklist View
Present Descriptions
High quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned standards and work displays graduate degree important and analytic pondering.–
Wonderful 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Honest 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Poor zero (zero%) – 20 (20%)
High quality of Work Submitted:
The aim of the paper is evident.–
Wonderful 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good four (four%) – four (four%)
Honest three.5 (three.5%) – three.5 (three.5%)
Poor zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Concepts:
The prolong to which the work displays the coed’s potential to:
Perceive and interpret the assignment’s key ideas.–
Wonderful 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Good eight (eight%) – eight (eight%)
Honest 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Poor zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Concepts:
The prolong to which the work displays the coed’s potential to:
Apply and combine materials in course assets (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outdoors assets.–
Wonderful 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Honest 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Poor zero (zero%) – 13 (13%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Concepts:
The prolong to which the work displays the coed’s potential to:
Synthesize (combines numerous parts or completely different concepts into a brand new complete) materials in course assets (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outdoors, credible assets by evaluating completely different factors of view and highlighting similarities, variations, and connections.–
Wonderful 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Honest 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Poor zero (zero%) – 13 (13%)
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Construction: Paragraphs clarify factors that Help nicely developed concepts, circulation logically, and exhibit continuity of concepts. Sentences are clearly structured and thoroughly focused–neither lengthy and rambling nor brief and missing substance.–
Wonderful 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good four (four%) – four (four%)
Honest three.5 (three.5%) – three.5 (three.5%)
Poor zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing requirements: Appropriate grammar, mechanics, and correct punctuation–
Wonderful 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good four (four%) – four (four%)
Honest three.5 (three.5%) – three.5 (three.5%)
Poor zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows appropriate APA format for title web page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, web page numbers, operating head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference listing.–
Wonderful 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Good four (four%) – four (four%)
Honest three.5 (three.5%) – three.5 (three.5%)
Poor zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Whole Factors: 100
