Assessment Brief
RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGMENT
Assessment 2
Disruption & Engagement
Due: Week eight
Weighting: 30%
Kind: Case Examine Assessment / Visible & Written Presentation)
Studying Outcomes:
a. analysis, analyse and critically consider efficient disruption practices;
b. critically consider world cultural dynamics that affect disruption and engagement;
d. write concise, coherent and knowledgeable arguments of how social, cultural, moral, environmental and sustainability idea applies to digital media practise;
e. ship a private perspective on related disruption and world engagement apply.
Description:
Analysis and analyse a case research of disruption with world implications that was unsuccessful in reaching its meant goal. Mirror and write a vital Assessment to determine why the disruption was unsuccessful, the affect it did or didn’t make, together with stage of engagement, social, cultural, moral, environmental & sustainability concerns on the subject of idea (embrace citations utilizing Harvard referencing). Describe how you’ll have approached it otherwise to ship the specified end result. As well as, put together a self-reflective assertion of the private place on the undertaking course of and outcomes. Current as a visible presentation (min. 20 slides) and written presentation (2,000 phrases).
Particulars:
College students should cite at the very least three exterior sources and refer to those utilizing Harvard referencing (in textual content citations and reference listing). Additionally embrace a full bibliography.
Add ultimate essay as a PDF file (Phrase transformed to PDF) and a second PDF file (PowerPoint transformed to PDF) of the visible presentation to Moodle for marking.
Marking Standards & Rubrics:
Criterion 1: Depth of analysis and Assessment – 40%
Fail: Incomplete analysis and Assessment
Move: Enough however fundamental analysis and Assessment
Credit score: Competent analysis and Assessment
Distinction: Compressive and detailed analysis and Assessment
ASSESSMENT BRIEFS I RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGMENT
1
File: RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement_UnitOutline
Creator: Perdis / Gemenis Date: 1/11/2021 Standing: Remaining
Assessment Brief
Excessive Distinction Excellent analysis and Assessment
Criterion 2: Vital analysis of influences and affect – 20%
Fail: Incomplete vital analysis
Move: Enough however fundamental vital analysis
Credit score: Competent vital analysis
Distinction: Compressive and detailed vital analysis
Excessive Distinction Excellent vital analysis
Criterion three: Private refection – 20%
Fail: Incomplete private reflection
Move: Enough however fundamental private reflection
Credit score: Competent private reflection
Distinction: Compressive and detailed private reflection
Excessive Distinction Excellent and insightful private reflection
Criterion four: High quality of presentation (incl. Referencing) – 20%
Fail: Incomplete presentation, no references
Move: Enough however fundamental presentation, some references
Credit score: Competent presentation with references
Distinction: Compressive and detailed presentation, correct references
Excessive Distinction Excellent presentation, contains further references
ASSESSMENT BRIEFS I RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGMENT
2
File: RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement_UnitOutline
Creator: Perdis / Gemenis Date: 1/11/2021 Standing: Remaining
—
RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT RELEVANT DISRUPTION &
Disruption & Engagement (Assessment 2)
Week eight is the deadline.
30 % weighting
Assessment of a case research / visible and written presentation)
Outcomes of Studying:
a. analysis, analyze, and critically consider efficient disruption practices; b. critically consider world cultural dynamics that affect disruption and engagement; d. write concise, coherent, and knowledgeable arguments demonstrating how social, cultural, moral, environmental, and sustainability idea applies to digital media apply; e. current a private perspective on related disruption and world engagement apply.
Description:
Examine and analyze a case research of a world disruption that failed to attain its meant objective. Mirror on and produce a vital Assessment to find out why the disruption failed, the affect it had (or didn’t have), together with stage of involvement, social, cultural, moral, environmental, and sustainability components on the subject of idea (embrace citations utilizing Harvard referencing). Clarify how you’ll have approached it otherwise to be able to obtain the meant consequence. Put together a self-reflective assertion in your private perspective on the undertaking’s strategy and outcomes as nicely. Make a visible presentation (minimal of 20 slides) in addition to a written presentation (2,000 phrases).
College students should point out at the very least three exterior sources and use Harvard referencing to take action (in textual content citations and reference listing). Embrace an entire bibliography as nicely.
Add the ultimate essay as a PDF file (Phrase transformed to PDF) and the visible presentation as a second PDF file (PowerPoint transformed to PDF) to Moodle for Assessment.
Rubrics and grading standards:
Criterion 1: Analysis and Assessment breadth – 40%
Failure as a consequence of inadequate analysis and Assessment
Move: Primary however sufficient research and Assessment.
Competent analysis and Assessment are to be credited.
Distinction: Thorough and in-depth investigation and Assessment
I RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BRIEFS
RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement UnitOutline is a single file.
Perdis / Gemenis, Perdis / Gemenis, Perdis / Gemenis, The 12 months is 2021, and the date is November 1st. Standing: Full
a short Assessment
Excellent research and Assessment with a excessive distinction
Standards 2: Vital Assessment of influences and affect (20%)
Fail: A vital analysis that is not complete.
Move: A fundamental however enough vital examination.
Competent vital analysis is to be credited.
Distinction: Complete and in-depth vital Assessment
Excellent vital analysis with a excessive distinction
Private reflection (20%) is the third criterion.
Fail: A private perspective that is not full.
Move: Acceptable but elementary private reflection.
Private reflection that’s competent is to be credited.
Private contemplation that’s each complete and detailed.
Highest Honors Private contemplation that’s excellent and insightful
Criterion four: Presentation high quality (together with referencing) – 20%
Failure: Incomplete presentation with no citations
Move: Primary however enough presentation, with a number of references
Credit score: Wonderful presentation with citations
Distinction: Detailed and complete exposition, with actual references
Excellent presentation with further references. Excessive Distinction
I RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BRIEFS
RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement UnitOutline.docx 2
Perdis / Gemenis, Perdis / Gemenis, Perdis / Gemenis, Perdis / Gemenis, Perdis / Gemenis,
