Assessment Two – Case Report
Assessment item 2 – Case Study Report
Worth:50%
Due Date:07-Oct-2022
Return Date:28-Oct-2022
Size:1800
Submission technique choices: Different submission technique
Activity:
On this Assessment you’re required you to put in writing a report primarily based on the case situation which seems on the NRS275 Interact2 website throughout the Assessment item 2 tab. Utilizing the case situation please tackle:
1) The worth assumptions which can be evident within the case examine; and
2) How the rules of transpersonal caring might be utilized to enhance the interactions within the situation.
Please construction your report as follows:
Introduction (roughly 150 phrases):
Embody an introduction that units out the general construction of the report and descriptions the worth assumptions evident within the case situation.
Question Assignment One (approx. 750 phrases):
Present an evidence of the worth assumptions which can be evident within the case examine.
Question Assignment Two (approx. 750 phrases):
Describe how the rules of transpersonal caring might be utilized to enhance the interactions within the situation.
Conclusion (roughly 150 phrases):
Embody a conclusion that describes how the rules of transpersonal caring tackle the recognized worth assumptions, thus enhancing the interactions within the case situation.
In your essay you must:
• Response to questions should be offered in full sentences with out casual language and jargon and referenced precisely.
• Don’t use dot factors
• Use solely present scholarly sources for this Assessment activity. (e.g. the present version of a textbook no more than 5 (5) years previous and peer – reviewed journal articles no more than seven (7) years previous).
• Dot com (.com) web sites and blogs will not be appropriate for tutorial work and won’t be recognised as credible references. Normal internet searches won’t give you info of ample high quality to move this Assessment.
• Please use the CSU library search (CINHAL, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, PubMed) engines to entry info. For this Assessment activity, solely use present scholarly sources. (For instance, the present version of a textbook should be not more than 5 (5) years previous, and peer-reviewed journal articles should be not more than 7 (seven) years previous.)
• Dot com (.com) web sites and blogs are inappropriate for tutorial use and won’t be accepted as credible references. Normal internet searches won’t give you ample high quality info to move this Assessment.
• To entry info, please use the CSU library serps (CINHAL, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and PubMed).
• APA seventh version conventions needs to be used for in textual content citations and within the reference listing.
You should help your paper with a minimal of 12 current (lower than 7 years previous) and credible sources. All intext citations are included within the phrase rely. 50% of your sources needs to be peer-reviewed journal articles. It’s best to help your paper with a mixture of the next credible sources:
• Peer-reviewed journal articles (these are the best high quality sources);
• Textbooks (Together with, however not restricted to your prescribed texts for this topic).
The paper is a bit of educational writing and may due to this fact adhere to educational writing conventions. Full sentences and paragraphs, spelling and grammar needs to be thoughtfully constructed all through.
Sub-headings are acceptable. Dot factors, tables, lists, colloquial language and shorthand are NOT acceptable.
•
Case Study John – Assessment Two
Case Study John – Assessment Two
Case Study John – Assessment Two – Worth Assumptions and Transpersonal Instructing
You’re a second 12 months pupil nurse on placement in an aged care facility dementia unit and have been requested to finish an Assessment on John. John has been dwelling within the facility for 2 years and was recognized with Alzheimer’s dementia 5 years in the past. As you assessment John’s care plan you be aware that John was a proficient actor and labored in some well-known films in Australia. You additionally be aware that John now has problem with speech and writing (aphasia) and brief time period reminiscence loss. It has been recognized within the care plan that John is at occasions aggressive with employees, doesn’t like transferring from his chair and refuses to depart his room.
You method John in his room with some trepidation and clarify to him that you simply want to full an Assessment. You discover that he appears frightened whenever you converse to him and as you method John he turns into very agitated and yells at you to depart the room. You resolve to talk with the Registered Nurse (RN) who’s in command of the dementia unit that day.
If you clarify what has occurred to the RN she asks you whether or not you may have mirrored on the implications for John of his aphasia and brief time period reminiscence loss and what it’d imply for his means to know others and talk. She additionally asks about whether or not you may have mirrored on the worth assumptions as described by Watson’s caring science, earlier than approaching John. She explains that that is notably related for John’s security and nicely-being.
The registered nurse then asks you to replicate on the rules of transpersonal educating, and particularly Precept 7: Promotion of a transpersonal educating and studying. She means that whenever you subsequent method John to base your interplay on an understanding of those rules as an individual with distinctive wants, and as a foundation for moral, individual centred care in apply.
You spend a while making ready to method John once more, however this time calmly, with a caring perspective and a give attention to a caring-therapeutic modality. After you may have launched your self to John and requested for his permission to enter his room, you share with him your love of flicks and discuss with his pictures on the wall. As he begins to talk you discover he has stiffness in his legs and arms. You ask him if he would love a warmth pack and therapeutic massage as a option to relieve his discomfort. He agrees to a warmth pack however continues to ask who you’re and what you’re doing in his room.
•
ubric For Assessment 2
ubric For Assessment 2
Standards Excessive Distinction
(85-100%) Distinction
(75-84.5%) Credit score
(65-74.5%) Move
(50-64.5%) Fail
(Zero-49%) Mark
Inclusion of an introduction and conclusion:
The introduction set out the general construction of the essay.
Present a conclusion that summarises your findings with out including any new info. You’ve got included a introduction that signposts the general construction of the essay
You’ve got offered a conclusion that integrates and emphasises your findings with out including any new info
(eight.5 – 10 marks) You’ve got included a introduction units out the general construction of the essay.
You’ve got offered a conclusion that integrates your findings with out including any new info.
(7.5 – eight.four marks) You’ve got included a introduction that units out the general construction of the essay
You’ve got offered a conclusion that clearly explains your findings with out including any new info.
(6.5 – 7.four marks) You’ve got included an introduction that broadly outlines the general construction of the essay.
You’ve got offered a conclusion that summarises your findings with out including any new info.
(5 – 6.four marks) You haven’t set out the general essay construction within the introduction.
You haven’t offered a conclusion that summarises your findings and/or you may have added new info.
(Zero – four.9 marks)
/10
Supplies an outline rationalization of the worth-primarily based assumptions evident on this case examine. You’ve got examined worth-primarily based assumptions succinctly, clearly and with element in relation to the scientific case examine.
(29.5 – 35 marks) You’ve got defined worth-primarily based assumptions in relation to the scientific case examine.
(24.5 – 29.four marks) You’ve got mentioned worth-primarily based assumptions in relation to the scientific case examine.
(19.5 – 24.four marks) You’ve got described worth-primarily based assumptions in relation to the scientific case examine.
(15 – 19.four marks) You haven’t referred to the worth assumptions.
You haven’t mentioned, or you may have offered restricted objects of the worth assumptions in relation to the scientific case examine.
(Zero – 14.9)
/35
Explains the rules of transpersonal caring.
Describe how the rules of transpersonal caring might be utilized to enhance the interactions within the case examine. Explains the rules of transpersonal caring.
Examines how the rules of transpersonal caring might be utilized to enhance the interactions within the case examine.
(29.5 – 35 marks) Explains the rules of transpersonal caring.
Explains how the rules of transpersonal caring might be utilized to enhance the interactions within the case examine.
(24.5 – 29.four marks) Explains the rules of transpersonal caring.
Discusses how the rules of transpersonal caring might be utilized to enhance the interactions within the case examine.
(19.5 – 24.four marks) Explains the rules of transpersonal caring.
