T1 2022: ICT201 Laptop Organisation and Structure Assessment four
Assessment sort: Report (2,000 phrases) – particular person task
Function: This Assessment will enable college students to reveal that they’ll establish and perceive synchronisation and deadlocks. This Assessment contributes to Studying Outcomes b and c.
Worth: 25% (Report 15%; Presentation 10%)
Due Date: Report Submission by way of Moodle (Week 9 Sunday 23:59); Presentation (Week 10 – 11)
Submission: Add the finished report by way of Moodle.
Assessment Subject: Analysis of an Operating System Process Control.
Activity Particulars:
The report would require an Assessment of an working system course of management specializing in the method management block and Process picture.
Project Particulars:
Analysis the Web or present literature to analyse and describe the Operating System Process Control. Regarding the Process Control Block and Process Picture. The report would require an Assessment of an working system Process Control Construction. The report on the Process Control Construction focuses on “Process Control Block” and “Process
Picture”.
Additionally, broaden the small print of these course of management constructions, examine them and supply sufficient supporting supplies.
Coursebook: Stallings, W. (2018). Operating System: internals and design ideas. ninth ed. Essex: Pearson Training Restricted.
• You must use different assets like web assets, books, journals and conferences.
• Your report needs to be clearly structured.
• Put together a short presentation of your report, and current it to the remainder of the category. There is no such thing as a must submit the presentation as you’ll current the identical submitted report file.
• You need to present references and cite the assets that you just consulted for this task.
• Harvard referencing is the required technique. (APA is suitable)
• Be sure that your assets are well timed. For instance, discover the date when the analysis was printed. Make sure to validate the authenticity of your sources. Keep away from any that may be questionable, similar to blogs and publicly edited on-line (wiki) sources.
Assessment four Marking Rubrics – Report:
Standards Unsatisfactory Passable Efficient Glorious Distinctive 15 %
Content material Fail
(zero – 49%) Cross (50 – 64%) Credit score (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) Excessive Distinction (85 – 100%)
Depth of Content material The reason is
sufficiently inaccurate, incomplete, or complicated that the reader good points little data from the report. It seems that little try has been made to Help the reader perceive the fabric. Some problem in studying, construction missing in some components Effectively written, construction not
completely clear Effectively written and structured. An correct and full clarification of key ideas and theories is made, drawing on related literature. Sufficient element is introduced to permit the reader to know the content material and make judgments about it. As well as, functions of idea are included to light up points. Readers acquire insights. three
Accuracy of Content material Doesn’t straight reply Question Assignment Straight solutions most of the Question Assignment Straight solutions the Question Assignment Straight solutions the Question Assignment giving extra insights Data (names, details, and so on.) included within the report is constantly correct. three
Readability of
Function No help for the mission’s goals taken within the reply. Gives some help for the mission’s goals taken. The mission’s goals are introduced. The motivation for pursuing the mission and its relevance are addressed. The dialogue within reason clear however not compelling. Gives wonderful degree of help for mission’s goals taken. The mission’s goals are clearly said. The motivation for pursuing the mission
and its
relevance are clearly
and persuasively established by relating the mission to present engineering issues. three
Depth of Analysis No Assessment introduced Analysis based mostly on some argument Analysis based mostly on sound argument Analysis based mostly on an intensive argument Outcomes are rigorously and objectively analysed. Interpretations are made utilizing applicable equations, fashions, or theories. three
Use of
Language:
Phrase
Alternative,
Grammar, and Sentence
Construction Little or no
information of material demonstrated. Sufficient information of material demonstrated. Sound information of material demonstrated. Excessive degree of information of material demonstrated. Excessive degree of information of material and synthesis with idea demonstrated three
Marking Rubrics: Presentation (10%)
Standards Fail (zero – 49%) Cross (50 – 64%) Credit score (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) Excessive Distinction (85 – 100%) 10%
Visible attraction There are lots of
errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation, the slides are troublesome to learn and comprise an excessive amount of textual content, poor selection of fonts and hues, no or little visible attraction, There are errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. An excessive amount of textual content on many slides. Minimal effort made to make slides interesting There could also be some errors in spelling,
grammar and punctuation. An excessive amount of textual content on two or extra slides.
Important visible attraction. There are not any errors
in spelling,
grammar, and punctuation. Data is obvious and concise on every slide.
Visually interesting and interesting. No errors, engagi trying presentati ng
on 2
Content material The presentation offers a short have a look at the subject however many questions are left unanswered. Majority of data is irrelevant and vital factors not noted. The presentation Is informative however a number of components are unanswered. A lot of the data
irrelevant, protection of some of main factors. The presentation is an efficient abstract of the subject.
Most vital Data lined; little irrelevant data. The presentation is a concise
abstract of the subject with all questions answered. Complete and full protection of data. Exceptionally good abstract of the subject and offers extensiv supportive eleme to help the benefit of understanding of t viewers. e
nts he four
Presentation
expertise Minimal eye contact specializing in small half of viewers. The viewers is just not engaged.
Spoke too rapidly or
quietly making it obscure. Inappropriate/disin terested physique language. Focuses on solely half of the viewers. Sporadic eye contact and the viewers is distracted.
Speaker may very well be heard by solely half of the viewers.
Physique language is distracting. Speaks to majority of the viewers; regular eye contact.
The viewers is engaged by the presentation. Speaks at an acceptable quantity with some fidgeting. Common/fixed eye contact, The viewers is engaged, and presenter held the viewers’s consideration. Acceptable talking quantity
& physique language. Exceptionally
Good presentatio expertise, wonderful viewers engagement. n four

Published by

Write

View all posts