Assignment
ACC202 Corporate Accounting
Assessment particulars
Weight 30%
Due date 11.00 pm Friday 6 Could
That is a person Assessment activity
You’re required to finish a research-based project
Directions
Choose an organization that meets the next standards:
• The corporate have to be a constituent of the S&P/ASX 300 index (www.asx300listing.com);
• The corporate should publish audited annual monetary studies in English, absolutely complying with IFRS or AASB requirements and
• The corporate should have a 30 June 12 months finish.
Write an essay of 1,500 phrases and canopy the next:
1. The position judgment in accounting and three implications on the customers of accounting info if the skilled judgment has not been made in probably the most affordable/applicable method.
2. Present an in depth clarification of the impairment write-down(s) made by your organization within the 12 months ended 30 June 2018. Your clarification ought to embody a dialogue
a. of the asset/s that have been impaired.
b. the kind of estimations required to put in writing the impairment.
c. the quantity of the impairment write-down and
d. related disclosures within the 30 June 2018 monetary report in relation to impairment testing
three. Based mostly in your findings partially 2, critically focus on whether or not the skilled judgments utilized within the impairment write-down of the property have been affordable/applicable.
Suggest actions (if any) for enchancment within the software judgments.
four. Based mostly in your findings partially three, critically analyse to what extent the skilled judgments utilized on impairment write-downs fulfill the elemental traits of helpful monetary info and the target of monetary reporting.
Web page | 1 out of three
Methods to current your project
Size: 1,500 phrases
Construction: use essay construction (i.e. introduction + most important physique + conclusion + Bibliography) Formatting: commonplace 12 level font, 1.5 line spacing, and facet margin 2.5 large.
Referencing: all sources (i.e., the work and concepts of others) cited and referenced utilizing APA referencing system. It is advisable to present each in-text referencing and the Bibliography.
SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
This project have to be submitted by way of Turnitin in Moodle. Onerous copies won’t be accepted or marked
Chances are you’ll make TWO submissions by way of Turnitin to test your work for plagiarism and make
changes accordingly up till the due date. Submissions are open from 11 pm Friday 29 April to
11.00 pm Friday 6 Could
To keep away from plagiarism you should:
• maintain similarity price lower than 10%
• Make sufficient in-text referencing
• Paraphrase authentic concepts
• Present a bibliography
Late submission
10% penalty will apply for each 24 hours delay in submission
Help
Educational help: https://moodle.gatewaycollege.edu.au/course/view.php?id=15
Educational Misconduct coverage: 4ed4c59bffb3328f26ecf3f10dfcb988.pdf (gatewaycollege.edu.au)
Web page | 2 out of three
Not tried Fail Go Credit score Distinction Excessive Distinction
The position judgment in accounting and three implications on the customers of accounting info if the skilled judgment has not been made in probably the most affordable/applicable method.
5 marks Not tried or fully or considerably plagiarized from different sources. zero marks Writing is unclear.
Leaves out a number of related elements of the position judgment and the implications.
2 marks Writing isn’t very clear. Describes the position judgment and the implications though considerably extra element could also be wanted.
2.5 marks Writes clearly.
Appropriately describes the position judgment and the implication. Particulars are principally appropriate, though extra element could also be wanted.
three.5 marks Writes clearly.
Appropriately describes the of position judgment and the implications with satisfactory element.
four marks Writes clearly.
Appropriately describes the judgment and the implications with plentiful element.
5 marks
Clarification of impairment writedown made by your alternative of
firm
5 marks Not tried or fully or considerably plagiarized from different sources.
zero marks Writing is unclear.
Clarification incomplete or defective in a number of elements.
2 marks Writing isn’t very clear. Clarification together with property written down, quantity, kinds of estimation and Assessment of disclosures however with omissions and/or incorrect clarification.
2.5 marks Writes clearly.
Largely full clarification together with property written down, quantity, purpose and Assessment of disclosures.
three.5 marks Writes clearly.
Clarification together with property written down, quantity, kinds of estimation and Assessment of disclosures with minor omissions.
four marks Writes clearly.
Full clarification together with property written down, quantity, kinds of estimation
and Assessment of disclosures
5 marks
Important dialogue on whether or not the skilled judgments utilized within the impairment write-down of the property are affordable/applicable. Suggest actions (if any) for enchancment within the software judgments. eight marks Not tried or fully or considerably plagiarized from different sources.
zero marks Chosen firm isn’t appropriate/Doesn’t embody
related particulars, makes use of defective Assessment. Suggestions don’t relate to impairment testing.
three marks Consists of the vast majority of related particulars, though some Assessment could also be defective. Suggestions regarding just some areas of
impairment testing
four marks Consists of most related particulars. Assessment principally correct however extra wanted. Suggestions regarding most areas of impairment testing.
6 marks Consists of almost all related particulars. Assessment principally correct with satisfactory element.
Suggestions refer to almost all areas of impairment testing.
7 marks Consists of related and probably uncommon particulars. Assessment correct and insightful. Suggestions confer with all areas of the impairment testing with nice particulars.
eight marks
Important Assessment as to what extent the skilled judgments utilized on impairment write -downs fulfill the elemental traits of helpful monetary info and the target of monetary reporting.
7 marks Not tried or fully or considerably plagiarized from different sources.
zero marks Chosen firm isn’t appropriate/Didn’t relate potential disclosures to any side of basic traits of helpful monetary info and the target of monetary reporting.
2 marks Relate just some potential disclosures to some elements of basic traits of helpful monetary info and the target of monetary reporting.
three.5 marks Relate a lot of the potential disclosures to a lot of the elements basic traits of helpful monetary info and the
goal of monetary reporting.
5 marks Refer to almost all potential disclosures to almost all elements of basic traits of helpful monetary info and the target of monetary reporting.
6 marks Confer with all potential disclosures to nearly all elements of the elemental traits of helpful monetary info and the target of monetary reporting. Important investigation as to what extent the skilled judgements based mostly on impairment write -downs fulfill the elemental options of significant monetary info and the goal of monetary reporting.
7 markings Not tried or absolutely or considerably plagiarized from different sources.
zero marks Chosen agency isn’t appropriate/Didn’t tie potential disclosures to any side of important options of precious monetary info and the goal of monetary reporting.
2 markings Relate just a few potential disclosures to some elements of important qualities of usable monetary info and the goal of monetary reporting.
three.5 markings Relate a lot of the out there disclosures to a lot of the most important basic qualities of significant monetary info and the
goal of monetary reporting.
5 markings Confer with nearly all conceivable disclosures to almost all elements of important traits of precious monetary info and the goal of monetary reporting.
6 markings Confer with all possible disclosures to virtually all elements of the important qualities of significant monetary info and the goal of monetary reporting.
7 marks
Doc formatting and construction
Written expression and referencing
5 marks Not tried or fully or considerably plagiarized from different sources. zero marks Fails to observe project requirement.
Too quick or too lengthy/Strongly have an effect on reader as a result of formatting errors and complicated organisation. 2 marks Often meets the project requirement. Distract reader as a result of formatting errors.
Organisation causes some confusion. 2.5 marks Often meets the project requirement. Often embody formatting errors.
Organisation of sections and paragraphs usually clear.
three.5 marks Largely meets the project requirement. Hardly ever embody formatting errors. Clear organisation of sections and paragraphs.
four marks Meets all of the project necessities.
Use skilled, appropriate formatting. Clear organisa
