: Similar Yet Different Essay, Research Paper
When one examines the similarities between Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, and The Giver by Lois Lowry, they may be baffled. They may believe that Lowry merely did a tally off of Huxley & # 8217 ; s extremely successful chef-d’oeuvre. The similarities are extraordinary, but so are their differences. Many facets of these novels are about indistinguishable while others are wholly foreign to each other. Both of these novels feature construction societies, but the societies are non the same. In Brave New World, there are no households or definite spouses, but neither society believes in love or true household. The Giver has no specific caste system, but the members of their community do non hold control of their ain hereafter ; that is left to the seniors. Last are Jonas and John. They are fundamentally the chief characters and both endure terrible inner problems, but are they similar plenty to do the novels similar?
In Brave New World, there is decidedly a caste system of community members.
Each degree of society supports to themselves. They work and live harmonizing to how they were conditioned. They do non hold a certain regulation on manners or behaviour ; they are promiscuous and, for the most portion, surpassing. The characters in Brave New World do non cognize the significance of the universe love. They do non hold the slightest intimation of what it is like to hold a household ; the thought of parents and childbearing repulse them. The Giver has a society that believes in holding households for stableness, but they do non believe in love. The word is wide and meaningless. When Jonas asked his parents if they loved him, they laughed and told him to be more specific because linguistic communication is everything. Do they bask him? Yes. Are they proud of him? Yes. But do non utilize the word love! On the issue of childbearing, they see it as a profession without award. They do non hold their ain kids, their kids are chosen for them. They do non turn up with their households for long ; when they turn a certain age, the contact with their parents comes to an terminal.
The characters in Brave New World live merrily ( and doltishly ) in their ain small caste systems. They are wholly unmindful to anything outside their ain small universes. They are put into a profession harmonizing to their caste system and their conditioning. They know nil about any other occupation in the community ; they do non even know the ground for what they do, the
Y merely make it. They have perfectly no say in what they want to be or where they want to suit in. They are conditioned and trained from their beginning to make what they were made to make. The Giver portrays a spot more freedom during occupation choice. When the kids reach the age of eight, they are given four old ages of voluntary work before their occupations are selected. The seniors take into deep consideration the picks of voluntary work that the kids have chosen. They attempt to do witting picks of callings for the twelve-year-olds. The seniors make about every pick that needs to be made in the community. In Brave New World, Mustafa Mond makes the ultimate picks.
When reading Brave New World, one will rapidly recognize that John go the chief character. One is able to associate more to John than any other character in the book. He is stricken with interior battles that may be impossible to modern society. He does non cognize whether or non to conform to his new milieus or to follow the ways of his past life on the barbarian reserve. He is overwhelmed by all of the wonder and is unable to pass on his jobs to anyone who would understand. His emptiness and feelings of guilt thrust him to suicide. In The Giver, Jonas is plagued by about the same jobs. He knows excessively much and is forbidden to portion his jobs and feelings with anyone but the Giver. Jonas feels that he is excessively immature and immature to digest all of this personal battle and disregarded memories. He wants to be released without being released by society & # 8217 ; s manner. He leaves, and to my reading, dies. Both John and Jonas were non mentally equipped to manage the state of affairss they were confronted with.
While many may non detect the similarities or differences in Brave New World and The Giver, they are rather obvious. While one society is repulsed at the yesteryear, the other merely erases it from memory and it is ne’er spoken of. Neither society believes in love or household, but there are elusive differences in their beliefs. While The Giver has no definite caste system, they have certain processs for degrees of society. John and Jonas are similar characters who are confronted with interior convulsion and happen their ain ways out. Weather New World and The Giver are fantastic plants of art that are highly close in plot lines. Whether one believes that they are similar or different, it must be said that the resemblances are about chilling.
