Chemical Engineering Department
Task three (15%)
Semester Spring Yr 2022
Course Title Chemical Engineering Junior Seminar
Course Code CHE 300 Part F2
Pupil Title Pupil ID
Due Date Confer with Moodle Teacher Dr. Abdullah Nasr
Pointers for Answer
Please learn and apply the next factors fastidiously:
1. Your submitted resolution have to be typed.
2. Write your title and ID# clearly on the submitted file.
three. Present detailed solutions.
four. Submit the pdf (just one file) file by way of the task Turnitin submission hyperlink in your
Moodle part web page. Solely pdf is suitable.
5. You’ll be able to submit your task not more than twice. So, make it depend.
6. College students are absolutely liable for submitting an accurate file. Be certain that it’s the appropriate file, it
is just not corrupted, and it’s readable. Unclear or absent solutions can be deducted.
7. Inaccurate or corrupted recordsdata would end in a deduction as per grading coverage.
eight. Late submission shall be allowed with penalty:
a) Delay by 1 calendar Day – 40% Deduction (grade is multiplied by zero.6)
b) Delay by 2 calendar Days – 60% Deduction (grade is multiplied by zero.four)
c) Delay by three calendar Days or extra – zero grade. No submission is accepted
Q1) (50 pts)
Take into account the next case:
“Mr. Watson works as a human sources skilled for an industrial governmental firm
referred to as “ABC”. He had a good friend and colleague who is known as Mr. John who additionally works for “ABC”.
Mr. Sam is one other worker within the firm “ABC”. Mr. Sam claimed that Mr. John had
dedicated an inappropriate behaviour so Mr. Sam requested Mr. Watson to research this declare
towards Mr. John (the good friend and collegue of Mr. Watson).
Based mostly on this case and on contemplating “battle of pursuits” likelihood, reply the next:
a) Clarify whether or not Mr. Watson will commit a “battle of pursuits” if he doesn’t examine the
grievance (declare). (10 pts)
b) Give an instance of a “optimistic paradigm” on this case. (5 pts)
c) Give an instance of a “unfavorable paradigm” on this case. (5 pts)
d) Give three examples that may be neither optimistic paradigm nor unfavorable paradigm. The examples
must be briefly described and numbered. (15 pts)
e) Use the “Line Drawing” methodology to point out your observations in components b), c), and d).
(Confer with the circumstances partly (d) utilizing their corresponding numbers in accordance with the way you
numbered them.) (15 pts)
Q2) (30 pts)
Decide whether or not the next statements are True or False. Justify your reply briefly.
Assertion
True
or False?
(5 pts)
Justification
(5 pts)
a.
Moral dilemma refers to inquiries
about how conflicting ethical
reflections associated to resolving a
ethical drawback must be balanced.
b. Battle of curiosity could be accepted
in some particular situations.
c. The minimalist view is without doubt one of the
most desired attitudes in the direction of
skilled accountability.
Q3) (20 pts)
Clarify briefly what is supposed by the next:
a) Obligation Accountability (10 pts)
b) Reclessly Inflicting Hurt (10 pts)
