Directions
Collaborate with group members, group liaisons, and/or members of well being care crew concerning your undertaking. Determine these group companions and accumulate data concerning the property and assets of your chosen group, and the way. Relate how they are going to be useful in implementing your undertaking. (These do not need to be massive organizations, however may be individuals instrumental to your undertaking.)
This project will embrace:
1. Introduction
2. Record at the least 2 Community Companions and a pair of group assets
three. Describe their roles in your undertaking.
four. Conclusion
Extra Directions:
· References (minimal of two references cited within the content material)
· Minimal of two pages (not together with title and reference web page)
· Your project needs to be typed right into a phrase doc and formatted in APA fashion. The project should embrace:
· A title web page and a reference web page
NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric
NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric
Standards
Rankings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeTopic
10 pts
Stage 5
Identifies a inventive, centered, and manageable matter clearly addressing vital factors.
9 pts
Stage four
Identifies a manageable matter that addresses vital factors.
eight pts
Stage three
Identifies a centered matter that addresses vital factors.
7 pts
Stage 2
Identifies a subject that whereas doable, is just too narrowly centered.
6 pts
Stage 1
Identifies a subject that’s far too basic and wide-ranging as to be doable.
zero pts
Stage zero
Doesn’t clearly establish a subject or identifies a subject that isn’t related to the project.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeExisting Information, Analysis, and/or Views
20 pts
Stage 5
Makes use of in-depth data from related sources representing a number of factors of views (three or extra) or analysis points (three or extra).
18 pts
Stage four
Describes in-depth data from related sources representing at the least two factors of view or analysis points.
16 pts
Stage three
Explains data from related sources representing at the least two factors of view or analysis points.
14 pts
Stage 2
Relates data from related and irrelevant sources. No clear perspective(s) of method(es) are recognized.
12 pts
Stage 1
Tells data from irrelevant sources representing a single perspective or doesn’t establish factors of view or approaches.
zero pts
Stage zero
Info is irrelevant to the subject. No clear perspective/approaches.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeContent
20 pts
Stage 5
Demonstrates the flexibility to assemble a transparent and insightful downside assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of all related contextual components.
18 pts
Stage four
Demonstrates the flexibility to assemble an issue assertion, thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of most related contextual components, and downside assertion is satisfactorily detailed.
16 pts
Stage three
Begins to reveal the flexibility to assemble an issue assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of most related contextual components, however downside assertion is superficial.
14 pts
Stage 2
Demonstrates a restricted potential in figuring out an issue assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion or associated contextual components.
12 pts
Stage 1
Demonstrates the flexibility to elucidate contextual components however doesn’t present an outlined assertion.
zero pts
Stage zero
There is no such thing as a proof of an outlined assertion.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAnalysis
20 pts
Stage 5
Organizes and compares proof to disclose insightful patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus.
18 pts
Stage four
Organizes and interprets proof to disclose patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus.
16 pts
Stage three
Organizes and describes proof in line with patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus.
14 pts
Stage 2
Organizes proof, however the group shouldn’t be efficient in revealing patterns, variations, or similarities.
12 pts
Stage 1
Describes proof, however it’s not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
zero pts
Stage zero
Lists proof, however it’s not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeConclusion
10 pts
Stage 5
Assembles a conclusion that could be a logical interpretation from findings.
9 pts
Stage four
Constructs a conclusion that’s logical from inquiry findings.
eight pts
Stage three
Identifies a conclusion particularly from and responds particularly to the findings.
7 pts
Stage 2
Produces a basic conclusion that, as a result of it’s so basic, additionally applies past the scope of the inquiry findings.
6 pts
Stage 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.
zero pts
Stage zero
States an illogical conclusion from findings.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeLimitations and Implications
5 pts
Stage 5
Insightfully discusses intimately related and supported limitations and implications.
four.5 pts
Stage four
Examines related and supported limitations and implications.
four pts
Stage three
Discusses related and supported limitations and implications.
three.5 pts
Stage 2
Presents related and supported limitations and implications.
three pts
Stage 1
Presents limitations and implications, however they’re unsupported.
zero pts
Stage zero
Presents limitations and implications, however they’re irrelevant.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeWriting
three pts
Stage 5
The paper displays a wonderful command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
2.7 pts
Stage four
The paper displays a superb command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the circulate of communication.
2.four pts
Stage three
The paper displays a fundamental command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impression the circulate of communication.
2.1 pts
Stage 2
The paper displays a restricted command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the circulate of communication.
1.eight pts
Stage 1
The paper displays little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader to cease and reread components of the writing to discern which means.
zero pts
Stage zero
The paper doesn’t reveal command of written English language conventions. The paper has a number of errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader issue discerning the which means.
three pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAPA
2 pts
Stage 5
The required APA parts are all included with appropriate formatting, together with in-text citations and references.
1.eight pts
Stage four
The required APA parts are all included with minor formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.
1.6 pts
Stage three
The required APA parts are all included with a number of formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.
1.four pts
Stage 2
The required APA parts are usually not all included and/or there are main formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.
1.2 pts
Stage 1
A number of APA parts are lacking. The errors in formatting reveal restricted understanding of APA pointers, in-text-citations, and r
