Content Critiques are supposed to offer you area to have interaction a few of our course readings in a bit extra depth. Specifically, they complement readings that might not be immediately relevant to design work. Studying about design, for example, won’t essentially describe a course of or technique which you could experiment with as you’re employed on design initiatives. Such a studying might merely attempt to distinguish design from different issues on this planet like science, and that is necessary. What makes one thing a design challenge as a substitute of a scientific one or an inventive one?
A basic assumption on this course is that you’ll do higher design work if in case you have a deeper understanding of design as such, and these content material critiques are designed to contribute to that understanding.
At this level, you have learn three extra texts about design pondering: 5 Phases within the Design Pondering Course of (Dam & Siang, 2017), Design Pondering 101 (Gibbons, 2016), and Ideas of Service Design Pondering (2017). On this second critique, choose one necessary core concept from one of many texts and write a 300-500 phrase doc consisting of the next:
Summarize the concept you could have chosen.
Clarify what the creator means with the concept.
Critique or focus on the concept and categorical your opinion/view of it.
With a purpose to get full factors for the task, your submission should embrace all three of those parts and it have to be submitted on time.
Hyperlinks
Gibbons, S. (July 31, 2016) Design pondering 101. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/design-thinking/
Dam, R., & Siang, T. (2017). 5 Phases within the Design Pondering Course of. Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
The Ideas of Service Design Pondering -Constructing Higher Providers. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/the-principles-of-service-design-thinking-building-better-services
