Core Measures Safety & Quality III Paper & Grading Rubric
Objective of Writing Throughout the Curriculum:
Scholarly writing is a ability developed and employed all through the undergraduate nursing
curriculum. Writing serves as a basis for crucial pondering, Helps with exploring and
buying new data, and engages college students in inventive pondering and drawback fixing about
specialised matters and areas of curiosity within the nursing self-discipline. Writing on the BSN stage
offers a basis for graduate work and professionalism. Upon commencement from the BSN
program, college students will display achievement of the School of Nursing program targets
(2, Three, & Four) and competencies (2, Four, & 7) associated to scholarly writing from the BSN Handbook. In
order to display this achievement, college students should be capable to:
• Search and entry scholarly literature and accessible assets
• Make the most of correct APA formatting, grammar, syntax, and punctuation
• Define and set up content material in a logical and cohesive method
• Critique, summarize, and synthesize proof successfully
• Assemble, ship, and help concise, well-structured arguments
Objective of this Paper:
The aim of the Core Measures paper is for the coed to discover and display an
understanding the accountability and function of the nurse in bettering high quality and security
efficiency within the healthcare group by means of Core Measures.
The paper will enable college students to realize the next targets:
• Determine The Joint Fee Core Measures and historical past.
• Determine particular Chart Abstracts(information) Efficiency Measurements required for
accreditation.
• Perceive the connection of the Core Measure with nursing care.
• Use know-how successfully for analysis and Assessment of evidence-based interventions to
preserve or enhance the Chart Summary Efficiency Measurements throughout the Core
Measure.
• Determine an motion plan and the function of the nurse in bettering a healthcare group’s
efficiency on the Core Measure.
Necessities:
1. The scholar will choose a Core Measure from the school present checklist
2. The scholar will write a concise Three-page APA paper utilizing the paper rubric Due 2/16 @
10 pm.
Three. Throughout the college students scheduled high quality audit or throughout considered one of their medical experiences in
an surroundings that a Core Measure is applied and assessed the coed will:
a. Determine the items Core Measures and particular Efficiency Measurements of the
Core Measure that the outlined medical surroundings assesses.
b. Assessment the posted information units of the Efficiency Measurements and Determine traits.
c. Mirror on the data as they full the targets of understanding the
nurse’s function in offering care to enhance the healthcare organizations efficiency
on the Core Measure.
Four. Literature Necessities
a. Cautious choice and Assessment of literature related to the chosen Core Measure and
Efficiency Measurements, inhabitants, and end result.
b. Literature have to be synthesized and built-in all through the paper.
c. Chosen articles characterize a Assessment of the present literature (lower than 5 years outdated
until authorised by paper grader).
d. A minimal of two authorised assets which will embrace journals, medical
follow pointers, and requirements of follow from skilled organizations.
**This standardized rubric represents the minimal customary of Core Measure/ Paper Task.
Programs with numerical
grading
Excellent
(91-100%)
Standards adopted in depth
and with crucial pondering –
insightful
Passable
(75-90%)
Standards adopted common –
met necessities
Unsatisfactory
(<75%)
Incomplete – incorrectly
applies and/or doesn’t
display understanding
after all ideas
Identification/Introduction:
(1-2 paragraphs)
Determine The Joint Fee Core
Measures
Take into account:
• Historical past & Significance of the
Core Measure
• Inhabitants Profile
• Anticipated Final result of The Joint
Commissions Core Measure
(18-20 Factors) All
gadgets are addressed,
acknowledged clearly, and are
well-supported utilizing
sturdy, related
proof from analysis
and/or authorities
organizations.
Inhabitants profile is
described totally and
supported with proof.
Objective/Anticipated
Final result assertion is
clear and comprises all
required parts.
(15-17.5 Factors)
Main gadgets are
addressed, however using
proof is restricted.
Wants to higher articulate
& convey significance.
Inhabitants profile wants
extra improvement
and/or clarification.
Objective/Anticipated
Outcomes assertion is
current however both lacks
readability or is the lacking
identification of variance
and/or particular
inhabitants/illness.
(14.5 or decrease)
Content material is incomplete.
Each significance and
inhabitants profile are
poorly mentioned.
Objective/Anticipated
Final result is absent or
indiscernible.
Use of proof is poor.
Assessment: (2-Three
paragraphs)
Take into account:
• Assessment of Chart Summary
efficiency measurements
for particular Core Measure
• Identification of Criterion of
Acceptable efficiency for
the efficiency
measurements.
• Nurse’s function to
affect Core Measure
Efficiency Outcomes.
Embody reflection of what
has been seen within the medical
setting
• Identification of potential
Variances between what has
been seen (or may happen)
within the medical setting and
proof base follow
discovered within the literature on
the function of the nurse with
reaching Efficiency
Outcomes
(18-20 Factors)
All gadgets are addressed,
acknowledged clearly.
Clearly states the Assessment of
measurements/information
required and acceptable
efficiency
The nurse’s function is obvious and
based mostly on the required Core
Measure. Reflection of private
perception seen on medical flooring is
included.
The potential variance is
clearly recognized and the
relationship between the
recognized variance and
reaching the Efficiency
end result is obvious and
concisely described.
(15-17.5 Factors)
All gadgets are addressed.
States the Assessment of
measurements/information
required however is probably not
clear on the appropriate
efficiency
The nurse’s function will not be clear
and/or based mostly on the
specified Core Measure.
Minimal reflection of private
perception seen on medical flooring is
included.
The potential variance will not be
clearly recognized and/or the
relationship between the
recognized variance and the
Efficiency end result is is
not clear and concisely
described.
(14.5 or decrease)
Content material is incomplete
The Assessment of
measurements/ information is
imprecise and/or the appropriate
efficiency will not be
addressed.
The nurse’s report on
data and nursing function
will not be addressed and/or is
not specified to Core Measure.
There isn’t any reflection of
private perception seen on the
flooring.
The potential variance will not be
recognized and the
relationship between the
recognized variance and the
Efficiency end result will not be
described.
Motion plan: (2-Three
paragraphs)
Synthesis of at the very least 1
Proof Base Articles to
Keep or Enhance Chart
Summary/Information Efficiency
Measurement Scores for
Particular Core Measure.
Take into account:
• Subsequent steps or connection to
enhance follow
• Implications or outcomes of
interventions
• Systemic pondering, together with
social or political
implications
(18-20 Factors)
All gadgets are addressed in
depth.
The chosen nursing
methods are clearly and
concisely described.
Comprehensively conveys
the connection between
the Efficiency
Measurements being
addressed, the nursing care
technique, and exhibits
wonderful help for the
nurse’s function in addressing or
evaluating the variance, and
the specified end result of the
technique.
Detailed proof of the
effectiveness of the proof
base methods is clearly
described and mentioned and
displays synthesis of the
literature. Consists of
description of analysis
strategies used and abstract
of relevant findings.
(15-17.5 Factors)
All gadgets are addressed.
The chosen nursing
methods are outlined however
may have minor clarification
or additional description.
Exhibits restricted help of
the connection between
the Efficiency
Measurements being
addressed, the nursing care
technique, and the help for
the nurse’s function in
addressing or evaluating the
variance, and the specified
end result of the technique.
Proof of the effectiveness
of the proof base
methods is described
and/or mentioned however
analysis proof is restricted.
(14.5 or decrease)
Content material is incomplete.
The chosen nursing
methods are vaguely
outlined.
The connection between
the Efficiency
Measurements being
addressed and the specified
end result of the technique is
both not addressed or is
unclear.
The technique will not be a
nursing technique and/or
the help for the nurse’s
function will not be addressed.
Proof of the effectiveness
of the proof base
methods is lacking or is
inadequately described.
Reflection: (1 paragraph)
What Made It Vital or
Significant
Might embrace:
• Integration of earlier and
new data or expertise
• Private connection by means of
impressions or feelings
Self-assessment of beliefs,
biases, approaches,
motivations, or assumptions
(13.5-15 Factors)
All gadgets are addressed in
depth with private
rationale
(11.5-13 Factors )
All gadgets are addressed however
minimal rationale
(11 or decrease) Content material is
incomplete with no rationale.
Group & Writing
Expertise:
• Narrative or inventive writing
model
• Concepts are organized in a
logical trend, are clearly
articulated, and simple to
observe
• Transitions are used
between subsections/foremost
ideas
(5 Factors)
Paper flows logically.
Objective and
improvement of concepts
clear and ample.
Conceptual readability is
evident all through.
Paragraphs are effectively
centered and arranged
permitting for consistency of
concept/matter.
Paragraphs display
logical connection between
ideas/concepts utilizing
acceptable transition
assertion between concepts.
(Four-Four.5 Factors)
Objective and concepts want additional
improvement and articulation.
Introduction, physique, and/or
conclusion not totally developed.
Conceptual readability is clear;
paragraphs centered, however
enchancment in group of
concepts/matters is required.
Connection between
ideas/concepts evident however can
be improved. Transition
statements not at all times clear.
(Three.5 or decrease Factors)
Objective is unclear. Concepts poorly
developed and articulated.
Conceptual readability absent.
Paragraphs comprise a number of
concepts/matters.
Paragraphs don’t display
logical connection between
ideas/concepts.
Lacks acceptable transition
assertion between concepts.
Grammar, Punctuation, &
Spelling
• Clear sentence construction
• Restricted spelling errors
• Suggestions of Grammar,
punctuation & spelling
from NUR 355 paper was
obvious.
(5 Factors)
Writing comprises right
grammar, punctuation, and
spelling (together with right
selection/use of phrases,
constant topic/verb
tense, order of phrases in
sentences is right, no
contractions; not more than
one error per web page, or for
longer papers, no extra
than 4 errors
all through paper.
Spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, and
vocabulary utilization are
right and acceptable.
Sentences are assorted and
grammatically right.
Language is obvious and
exact. Phrase selection and
(Four-Four.5 Factors)
Writing comprises few
grammatical, punctuation, and
spelling errors; not more than
two minor errors per web page, or
for longer papers, 5-7 errors
all through paper.
Spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, and vocabulary
errors don’t intervene with
comprehension.
Sentences may have been
extra assorted and attention-grabbing.
Language is obvious. Phrase selection
and vocabulary are acceptable.
Some understanding of content material
(Three.5 or decrease Factors)
Writing comprises quite a few
and/or vital grammatical,
punctuation, and spelling errors;
three or extra errors per web page, or
for longer papers, greater than
seven errors in paper.
Spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, and vocabulary
utilization comprise
flaws that impede/detract from
readability.
Sentences are easy and lack
selection. Language is imprecise, lacks
readability, or consists of using
some jargon or conversational.
vocabulary exhibits
distinctive
understanding of content material
and is matched to the
topic and viewers.
Makes use of energetic voice and
writes in third particular person.
is proven. Use of energetic voice and
third particular person writing could also be
inconsistent
tone. Phrase selection and
vocabulary don’t clearly
categorical concepts or handle the
task.
Lively voice and/or third particular person
writing not used.
APA Formatting
• Correct APA formatted
• Cites sources when
acceptable however not required
• Suggestions of APA from NUR
355 paper was obvious.
(9-10 Factors)
Paper comprises Zero-2 APA
errors. One deduction per
sort of error. Right
APA formatting consists of:
Title, web page numbers,
margins (1-inch), font (12
pt), Occasions
New Roman, operating
head (all caps & <50
characters), identifies
abbreviations at time of
preliminary use.
Degree 1 headings are used
as required.
Sources are cited
accurately within the textual content,
together with right intext
quotation of secondary
sources
and direct quotations.
Sources are cited
accurately within the reference
web page.
Reference web page is a
full itemizing of all
sources used within the paper
(7.5-Eight.5 Factors)
Paper comprises Three-5 APA errors.
(7 or decrease Factors)
Paper comprises >5 APA errors.
Size & Effort
• Size of the paper must be
Three pages
• Confirmed severe effort
• Not only a synopsis of the
content material
(5 Factors)
Paper is concise at Three pages
lengthy (will probably be deducted if over
Four pages)
Severe effort was famous
with in depth rationale, not
only a synopsis of the content material
(Four-Four.5 Factors)
Paper is a paragraph lower than Three
pages lengthy or longer than Four pages
Severe effort is questioned as simply
a synopsis of the content material
(Three.5 or decrease Factors)
Paper is a lower than Three pages lengthy or
longer than Four pages
No effort is famous as a short synopsis
of the content material
Timeliness
• On-time submission together with
NUR 355 graded paper with
Suggestions
• Deduction of two factors per day
after the due date/time
(Zero Factors) (Zero Factors) (Zero Factors)
