Task three (15%)
Semester Spring Yr 2022
Course Title Chemical Engineering Junior Seminar
Course Code CHE 300 Part F2
Scholar Title Scholar ID
Due Date Confer with Moodle Teacher Dr. Abdullah Nasr
Pointers for Resolution
Please learn and apply the next factors fastidiously:
1. Your submitted answer have to be typed.
2. Write your title and ID# clearly on the submitted file.
three. Present detailed solutions.
four. Submit the pdf (just one file) file by means of the project Turnitin submission hyperlink in your
Moodle part web page. Solely pdf is appropriate.
5. You’ll be able to submit your project not more than twice. So, make it rely.
6. College students are absolutely liable for submitting an accurate file. Be certain it’s the right file, it
just isn’t corrupted, and it’s readable. Unclear or absent solutions can be deducted.
7. Inaccurate or corrupted information would lead to a deduction as per grading coverage.
eight. Late submission will probably be allowed with penalty:
a) Delay by 1 calendar Day – 40% Deduction (grade is multiplied by zero.6)
b) Delay by 2 calendar Days – 60% Deduction (grade is multiplied by zero.four)
c) Delay by three calendar Days or extra – zero grade. No submission is accepted
Q1) (50 pts)
Contemplate the next case:
“Mr. Watson works as a human sources skilled for an industrial governmental firm
known as “ABC”. He had a good friend and colleague who is named Mr. John who additionally works for “ABC”.
Mr. Sam is one other worker within the firm “ABC”. Mr. Sam claimed that Mr. John had
dedicated an inappropriate behaviour so Mr. Sam requested Mr. Watson to analyze this declare
in opposition to Mr. John (the good friend and collegue of Mr. Watson).
Primarily based on this case and on contemplating “battle of pursuits” chance, reply the next:
a) Clarify whether or not Mr. Watson will commit a “battle of pursuits” if he doesn’t examine the
criticism (declare). (10 pts)
b) Give an instance of a “constructive paradigm” on this case. (5 pts)
c) Give an instance of a “detrimental paradigm” on this case. (5 pts)
d) Give three examples that may be neither constructive paradigm nor detrimental paradigm. The examples
ought to be briefly described and numbered. (15 pts)
e) Use the “Line Drawing” methodology to indicate your observations in components b), c), and d).
(Confer with the circumstances partially (d) utilizing their corresponding numbers in accordance with the way you
numbered them.) (15 pts)
Q2) (30 pts)
Decide whether or not the next statements are True or False. Justify your reply briefly.
Assertion
True
or False?
(5 pts)
Justification
(5 pts)
a.
Moral dilemma refers to inquiries
about how conflicting ethical
reflections associated to resolving a
ethical drawback ought to be balanced.
b. Battle of curiosity may be accepted
in some particular circumstances.
c. The minimalist view is without doubt one of the
most desired attitudes in the direction of
skilled duty.
Q3) (20 pts)
Clarify briefly what is supposed by the next:
a) Obligation Duty (10 pts)
b) Reclessly Inflicting Hurt (10 pts)
———
third Task (15 p.c )
Spring Semester Yr 2022
Chemical Engineering Junior Seminar is the title of the course.
Part F2 of Course Code CHE 300
Scholar Title Scholar ID
Due Date Confer with Moodle Teacher Dr. Abdullah Nasr
Pointers for Resolution
Please learn and apply the next factors fastidiously:
1. Your submitted answer have to be typed.
2. Write your title and ID# clearly on the submitted file.
three. Present detailed solutions.
four. Submit the pdf (just one file) file by means of the project Turnitin submission hyperlink in your
Moodle part web page. Solely pdf is appropriate.
5. You’ll be able to submit your project not more than twice. So, make it rely.
6. College students are absolutely liable for submitting an accurate file. Be certain it’s the right file, it
just isn’t corrupted, and it
