Coverage Paper 2
All through the semester you’ll full Three transient coverage papers. The purpose of those papers is to know the hyperlinks between principle and coverage. This paper will contain the usage of Crime Options from the Nationwide Institute of Justice (NIJ). Any principle lined by the due date of this paper could also be utilized.
Directions
1. Crime Options appears to be like on the proof for each packages and practices. You’ll first need to learn concerning the variations between these right here.
2. Subsequent you’ll want to familiarize your self with the proof ranking meanings right here.
Three. You’re going to begin by choosing follow profile to look at right here. Observe that you need to use the search filter to slender down the outcomes by choosing issues comparable to matter or program class primarily based on what you have an interest in. I might advise in opposition to the expertise matter, as that can possible be tough to attach principle to.
Four. After getting chosen a follow, learn the profile and proof for it.
5. Inside the follow profile, there’s a tab titled Associated Packages. Choose a program inside this follow to discover and examine.
6. Reply the next in a proper, written paper, with acceptable APA citations for any research, course readings, or different sources.
Apply
a. Briefly describe the follow, together with what proof has discovered about it, and the way that proof was obtained (i.e. what did the researchers do to judge it?). (1-Three paragraphs)
b. Focus on what principle or theories you consider match finest with this follow. Justify your reasoning and you’ll want to cite appropriately. It would be best to clarify the idea and its ideas (2-Four paragraphs)
Program
c. Briefly describe this system, together with what proof has been discovered about it, and the way that proof was obtained (i.e. what did the researchers do to judge it?). (1-Three paragraphs)
d. Focus on why this program is a) an instance of the follow and b) an instance of the idea or theories you mentioned beforehand. Justify your reasoning and you’ll want to cite appropriately. (2-Four paragraphs)
Future Analysis
e. Primarily based off what the ranking of each your follow and program have been, think about instructions for future analysis. Contemplate this Question Assignment in relation to the idea or theories you mentioned.
i. Even when they have been each rated successfully, what do you assume might be checked out additional? For instance, maybe you mentioned a youth alcohol prevention curriculum in relation to social management and the 4 bonds, however this system evaluated solely touched on the bond elements of attachment and involvement. Thus, future analysis may look at how beliefs and dedication relate to alcohol prevention by finding out X or Y. Make sure you focus on the way you assume this future analysis ought to be carried out. (2-Four paragraphs)
ii. If the follow was rated successfully, however not this system (or vice versa), you’ll want to focus on why you assume that is likely to be and the way it might be improved.
Observe that the paragraph recommendations for every half are simply recommendations—you’ll have kind of—so long as you meet the Three-5 web page requirement it’s positive.
Analysis
1. Your paper ought to be Three-5 pages in size, not together with the references web page.
2. Your paper ought to be written at a graduate stage that includes and references course materials.
Three. Your paper ought to be formatted as Occasions New Roman, measurement 12, double spaced, 1 inch margins, with APA format for any citations. See Week 1 on CourseDen for APA quotation type sources.
Four. Your paper ought to be submitted on the due date by 11:59pm.
5. The next rubric will likely be used to judge every coverage paper.
Goal
Standards
Not Met
(F)
Wants Enchancment
(D Vary)
Minimally Acceptable
(C Vary)
Meets Expectations
(B Vary)
Exceeds Expectations
(A Vary)
High quality
· No proof of crucial pondering.
· No connections made (or nothing submitted).
· Superficial writing.
· No legitimate connections made between content material.
· No Assessment or perception.
· Essential presentation of opinion not current.
· Some connections made, though all may not be legitimate.
· Assessment of content material is obvious, though probably not full.
· Essential presentation of opinion just isn’t full.
· Legitimate connections made.
· Paper is full with Assessment and perception.
· If current, opinions are offered at a crucial stage.
· Excellent connections made.
· Paper demonstrates incredible Assessment and perception with consideration to element.
· If current, opinions are offered at a crucial stage.
Amount
· Amount is totally unacceptable (or nothing submitted).
· Size of paper doesn’t meet necessities.
· Correct quotation is lacking.
· Size of paper meets the necessities however contains appreciable “fluff” or “filler.”
· Correct quotation used.
· Size of paper meets necessities.
· Correct quotation used.
· Size of paper meets necessities.
· Correct quotation used.
Stylistics
· Content material is illegible (or nothing submitted).
· Many spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material is obscure.
· Few spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material is mostly straightforward to know.
· No spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material straightforward to know.
· No spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material straightforward to know.
