Coverage Paper 2
All through the semester you’ll full Three transient coverage papers. The purpose of those papers is to know the hyperlinks between idea and coverage. This paper will contain using Crime Options from the Nationwide Institute of Justice (NIJ). Any idea lined by way of the due date of this paper could also be utilized.
Directions
1. Crime Options appears on the proof for each packages and practices. You’ll first need to learn concerning the variations between these right here.
2. Subsequent it would be best to familiarize your self with the proof score meanings right here.
Three. You will begin by deciding on follow profile to look at right here. Word that you need to use the search filter to slim down the outcomes by deciding on issues comparable to matter or program class primarily based on what you have an interest in. I might advise towards the expertise matter, as that may possible be troublesome to attach idea to.
Four. After you have chosen a follow, learn the profile and proof for it.
5. Inside the follow profile, there’s a tab titled Associated Applications. Choose a program inside this follow to discover and examine.
6. Reply the next in a proper, written paper, with acceptable APA citations for any research, course readings, or different sources.
Follow
a. Briefly describe the follow, together with what proof has discovered about it, and the way that proof was obtained (i.e. what did the researchers do to guage it?). (1-Three paragraphs)
b. Talk about what idea or theories you consider match greatest with this follow. Justify your reasoning and be sure you cite appropriately. It would be best to clarify the speculation and its ideas (2-Four paragraphs)
Program
c. Briefly describe this system, together with what proof has been discovered about it, and the way that proof was obtained (i.e. what did the researchers do to guage it?). (1-Three paragraphs)
d. Talk about why this program is a) an instance of the follow and b) an instance of the speculation or theories you mentioned beforehand. Justify your reasoning and be sure you cite appropriately. (2-Four paragraphs)
Future Analysis
e. Based mostly off what the score of each your follow and program had been, take into account instructions for future analysis. Take into account this Question Assignment in relation to the speculation or theories you mentioned.
i. Even when they had been each rated successfully, what do you suppose might be checked out additional? For instance, maybe you mentioned a youth alcohol prevention curriculum in relation to social management and the 4 bonds, however this system evaluated solely touched on the bond parts of attachment and involvement. Thus, future analysis might study how beliefs and dedication relate to alcohol prevention by finding out X or Y. Make sure to focus on the way you suppose this future analysis ought to be carried out. (2-Four paragraphs)
ii. If the follow was rated successfully, however not this system (or vice versa), be sure you focus on why you suppose that may be and the way it might be improved.
Word that the paragraph strategies for every half are simply strategies—you’ll have kind of—so long as you meet the Three-5 web page requirement it’s wonderful.
Analysis
1. Your paper ought to be Three-5 pages in size, not together with the references web page.
2. Your paper ought to be written at a graduate stage that comes with and references course materials.
Three. Your paper ought to be formatted as Occasions New Roman, dimension 12, double spaced, 1 inch margins, with APA format for any citations. See Week 1 on CourseDen for APA quotation model assets.
Four. Your paper ought to be submitted on the due date by 11:59pm.
5. The next rubric can be used to guage every coverage paper.
Goal
Standards
Not Met
(F)
Wants Enchancment
(D Vary)
Minimally Acceptable
(C Vary)
Meets Expectations
(B Vary)
Exceeds Expectations
(A Vary)
High quality
· No proof of essential considering.
· No connections made (or nothing submitted).
· Superficial writing.
· No legitimate connections made between content material.
· No Assessment or perception.
· Essential presentation of opinion not current.
· Some connections made, though all won’t be legitimate.
· Assessment of content material is obvious, though presumably not full.
· Essential presentation of opinion is just not full.
· Legitimate connections made.
· Paper is full with Assessment and perception.
· If current, opinions are introduced at a essential stage.
· Excellent connections made.
· Paper demonstrates implausible Assessment and perception with consideration to element.
· If current, opinions are introduced at a essential stage.
Amount
· Amount is totally unacceptable (or nothing submitted).
· Size of paper doesn’t meet necessities.
· Correct quotation is lacking.
· Size of paper meets the necessities however consists of appreciable “fluff” or “filler.”
· Correct quotation used.
· Size of paper meets necessities.
· Correct quotation used.
· Size of paper meets necessities.
· Correct quotation used.
Stylistics
· Content material is illegible (or nothing submitted).
· Many spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material is obscure.
· Few spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material is usually simple to know.
· No spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material simple to know.
· No spelling or grammar errors.
· Content material simple to know.
