One of the basic assertions of the classical school is that people have “free will”. However, consistent research over the past 20 years+ seems to indicate that the classical school concept of “free will” is an illusion (it’s not real). In this article you will read about summaries of recent research on this important topic.
1. According to research, how do people exposed to skepticism about the existence of free will respond to ideas about punishment? What other kinds of attitudes are impacted by those who are skeptical of free will? Why does the article suggest these attitudes exist?
2. Briefly describe the work of Oliver Genschow. What group of people were studied? How many of them were studied? Please explain the outcome of the research (what changed and what didn’t among those who were studied?)
3. Why does the author state that the criminal justice system is not “dependent on the concept of free will”? To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? Explain your answer.
—-
One of the classical school’s central claims is that persons have “free will.” Consistent study over the last 20 years or so appears to demonstrate that the classical school concept of “free will” is an illusion (not real). This article will provide summaries of latest studies on this critical topic.
1. How do people who have been exposed to skepticism about the reality of free will respond to concepts about punishment, according to research? What additional attitudes are influenced by those who are dubious about free will? Why does the article imply that such sentiments exist?
2. Describe Oliver Genschow’s work in a few sentences. Who were the subjects of the study? How many of them were investigated? Please describe the outcome of the
