Criteria Ratings Points
Summary 17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• All required
data is
included. • No
extraneous
data is
included; formatting is
appropriate.
14 to >10.zero pts
Proficient
• All required data
is included. • Some
extraneous data is
included; formatting is
appropriate.
10 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Some required
data is included.
• Extraneous data
is included; formatting is
not appropriate.
zero pts
Not
Current
17 pts
Introduction 17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• Background
data is
partaking and leads
to a transparent
goal/thesis
assertion.
• Relevance to
course/subject is
articulated nicely.
• Analysis
Question Assignment(s) or
goal assertion is
clear and concise.
• Two or three important
dialogue factors of
the literature Assessment
are clearly recognized
within the goal
assertion.
14 to >10.zero pts
Proficient
• Background data
is at instances unclear or
uninteresting.
• Relevance to
course/subject might be
extra clearly articulated.
• Analysis Question Assignment(s) or
goal assertion might
be acknowledged extra clearly
and concisely. • Predominant
dialogue factors might
be extra clearly
articulated.
10 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Background data
is just not clearly articulated.
• Relevance to
course/subject is unclear.
• Analysis Question Assignment(s) or
goal assertion is
unidentifiable. • Predominant
dialogue factors usually are not
recognized within the goal
assertion.
zero pts
Not
Current
17 pts
Content material 20 to >15.zero pts
Superior
• Thorough
comparability and
distinction of findings
are offered and
relate to the principle
dialogue factors in
the order of their
look within the
goal assertion.
• Focus is on
analysis findings.
• Gaps and
controversies that
exist within the literature
are clearly mentioned.
15 to >12.zero pts
Proficient
• Comparability and
distinction of the findings
are offered however lack
thoroughness.
• Dialogue of findings
might relate higher to the
important dialogue factors in
the aim assertion.
• Gaps and controversies
within the literature are
mentioned, however readability
might be enhanced.
12 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Comparability and
distinction of findings are
missing. • Dialogue of
findings doesn’t relate
nicely to the principle
dialogue factors within the
goal assertion.
• Gaps (what’s unknown
and must be
researched) and
controversies that exist in
the literature usually are not
mentioned.
zero pts
Not
Current
20 pts
Analysis Venture: Draft Grading Rubric | BUSI629_D01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Conclusion 17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• A abstract of the
details is clearly
articulated.
• Implications or
conclusions associated to
enterprise apply(s)
are logical, related,
and clear. • Areas of
future analysis are
clearly recognized.
14 to >10.zero pts
Proficient
• A abstract of the principle
factors is offered, however
readability might be enhanced.
• Implications or
conclusions associated to
enterprise apply(s) are
included however lack logic,
relevance, or readability.
• Areas of future analysis
are recognized however lack
readability.
10 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• A abstract of the principle
factors is just not clearly
offered. • Implications
or conclusions associated to
enterprise apply(s) are
absent, illogical, irrelevant,
or unclear. • Areas of
future analysis usually are not
recognized.
zero pts
Not
Current
17 pts
References
(Variety of
Sources Utilized)
17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• A complete of 15 or
extra scholarly
articles from
peer-reviewed
sources is included.
14 to >10.zero pts
Proficient
• A complete of 14–10 extra
scholarly articles from
peer-reviewed sources
are included.
10 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Lower than 10 scholarly
articles from
peer-reviewed sources
are included.
zero pts
Not
Current
17 pts
Title Web page 11 to >eight.zero pts
Superior
• All required
data is
included. • No
extraneous
data is
included.
eight to >5.zero pts
Proficient
• All required data
is included. • Some
extraneous data is
included.
5 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Some required
data is included.
• Extraneous data
is included.
zero pts
Not
Current
11 pts
Logical Move 11 to >eight.zero pts
Superior
• The reader is
guided easily
via the logically
organized paper.
• Present APA stage
headings are used.
• No headings are
left alone on the
backside of a web page.
eight to >5.zero pts
Proficient
• The general
association is logical however
is sometimes tough to
comply with. • A minor
formatting error or 2 are
famous within the headings.
• No headings are left
alone on the backside of a
web page.
5 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• The association of
content material is haphazard and
tough to comply with.
• Headings usually are not
current or are formatted
inappropriately. • One (or
extra) heading is alone at
the underside of a web page.
zero pts
Not
Current
11 pts
Analysis Venture: Draft Grading Rubric | BUSI629_D01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Font, Margins and
Spacing
11 to >eight.zero pts
Superior
• Occasions New Roman
or Arial is used. • A
margin of 1 1/2 inch is
used on the left
border; margins of 1
inch are used on the
high, proper, and backside
borders. • Web page
quantity and web page
header are inserted at
the highest of every web page.
• Double-spacing is
used between all
strains. • There may be solely
1 area between
sentences.
• Paragraphs are
indented 5 areas.
eight to >5.zero pts
Proficient
• Occasions New Roman or
Arial is used via most
of the doc. • A
margin of 1 1/2 inch is
used on the left border;
margins of 1 inch are
used on the highest, proper, and
backside borders. • Web page
quantity and web page header
are absent or typed somewhat
than inserted on the high of
every web page.
• Double-spacing is used
between most strains.
• There may be just one area
between sentences.
• Paragraphs are
indented 5 areas.
5 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Occasions New Roman or
Arial is just not used. • A
margin of 1 1/2 inch is just not
used on the left border;
margins of 1 inch usually are not
used on the highest, proper, and
backside borders. • Web page
quantity and web page header
are absent or typed somewhat
than inserted on the high of
every web page.
• Double-spacing is just not
used constantly between
strains. • There may be usually
greater than 1 area
between sentences.
• Paragraphs usually are not
indented 5 areas.
zero pts
Not
Current
11 pts
Rferences
(Formatting)
11 to >eight.zero pts
Superior
• Correct formatting is
used all through the
reference listing. • Every
reference has a
matching quotation(s).
eight to >5.zero pts
Proficient
• A minor formatting error
or 2 are famous within the
reference listing. • Every
reference has an identical
quotation(s).
5 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• A number of formatting
errors occurred within the
reference listing. • One or
extra reference doesn’t
have an identical quotation.
zero pts
Not
Current
11 pts
Spelling/Grammar 11 to >eight.zero pts
Superior
• Spelling and
grammar are appropriate.
eight to >5.zero pts
Proficient
• Spelling and grammar
are principally appropriate with
just one–2 errors famous.
5 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Spelling and grammar
require additional Assessment with
three–6 errors famous.
zero pts
Not
Current
11 pts
Phrase Rely 17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• The web page depend is
20 (excluding title
web page, summary, and many others.)
14 to >10.zero pts
Proficient
• The web page depend is
19-15 (excluding title
web page, summary, and many others.)
10 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• The web page depend is much less
than 15 pages (excluding
title web page, summary, and many others.)
zero pts
Not
Current
17 pts
Whole Points: 160
Analysis Venture: Draft Grading Rubric | BUSI629_D01_202220
—————-
Criteria Ratings Summary Points 17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• The whole lot is required.
knowledge is accessible
• Not included.
extraneous
knowledge is accessible
included; formatting is included
appropriate.
14 to greater than 10.zero pts
Proficient
• All needed data
• Some are included
extraneous knowledge is
included; formatting is included
appropriate.
10 to >zero.zero pts
Growing
• Some required
data is included.
• Extraneous data
is included; formatting is
not appropriate.
zero pts
Not
Current
17 pts
Introduction 17 to >14.zero pts
Superior
• Background
data is
partaking and leads
to a transparent
goal/thesis
assertion.
• Relevance to
course/subject is
articulated nicely.
• Analysis
Question Assignment(s) or
goal assertion is
clear and concise.
• Two or three important
dialogue factors of
the literature Assessment
are clearly recognized
within the goal
assertion.
14 to >10.zero pts
Proficient
• Background data
is at instances unclear or
